본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean EFL Learners' Knowledge of Parts of Speech of High-frequency Vocabulary

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper explored Korean EFL students' productive vocabulary knowledge with a focus on their understanding of the parts of speech of words. Fourteen high-frequency words, most of which are at middle-school level, were chosen from the keywords of the Oxford 3000. Thirty-eight Korean EFL university students took a translation test, in which the 14 words were supposed to be used as the following parts of speech: brave(verb), cloud(verb), corner(verb), doctor(verb), empty(verb), face(verb), fine(verb), fool(verb), matter(verb), quiet(verb), sport(verb), way(adverb), weather(verb), and parent(verb). Interviews were then carried out to identify what was behind students' inability to use easy words effectively. Test results showed that the students' understanding of parts of speech of the words was quite limited. Students were found to believe that vocabulary learning takes care of itself. It also turns out that dictionary use had to do with students' lack of knowledge of parts of speech of core vocabulary. The findings of this study suggest that the Korean students need to be helped to take a proactive approach to improving their productive vocabulary.

Abstract

This paper explored Korean EFL students' productive vocabulary knowledge with a focus on their understanding of the parts of speech of words. Fourteen high-frequency words, most of which are at middle-school level, were chosen from the keywords of the Oxford 3000. Thirty-eight Korean EFL university students took a translation test, in which the 14 words were supposed to be used as the following parts of speech: brave(verb), cloud(verb), corner(verb), doctor(verb), empty(verb), face(verb), fine(verb), fool(verb), matter(verb), quiet(verb), sport(verb), way(adverb), weather(verb), and parent(verb). Interviews were then carried out to identify what was behind students' inability to use easy words effectively. Test results showed that the students' understanding of parts of speech of the words was quite limited. Students were found to believe that vocabulary learning takes care of itself. It also turns out that dictionary use had to do with students' lack of knowledge of parts of speech of core vocabulary. The findings of this study suggest that the Korean students need to be helped to take a proactive approach to improving their productive vocabulary.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Aitchison, J, "Words in the Mind" (1994), Blackwell
  2. Barcroft, J, "Can Writing a New Word Detract from Learning it? More Negative Effects of Forced Output during Vocabulary Learning", Second Language Research, 22, pp.487~497 (2006)
  3. Beauvillan, C, "Accessing Inter-lexical Homographs: Some Limitations of a Language Selective Device", Journal of Memory and Language, 26, pp.658~672 (1987)
  4. Chujo, K, "Understanding the Role of Text Length, Sample Size and Vocabulary Size in Determining Text Coverage", Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, pp.1~22 (2005)
  5. Ellis, R, "Modified Oral Input and the Acquisition of Word Meanings", Applied Linguistics, 16, pp.409~441 (1995)
  6. Harley, B, "The Lexicon in Language Research In: Lexical Issues in Language Learning", pp.1~28 (1995), Benjamins
  7. Harley, B, "Introduction: Vocabulary Learning and Teaching in a Second Language", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, pp.3~12 (1996)
  8. Hazenberg, S, "Defining a Minimal Receptive Second Language Vocabulary for Non-native University Students: An Empirical Investigation", Applied Linguistics, 17, pp.145~163 (1996)
  9. Henriksen, B, "Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development", Studies in Second language Acquisition, 21, pp.303~317 (1999)
  10. Laufer, B, "Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength, and Computer Adaptiveness", Language Learning, 54, pp.399~436 (2004)
  11. Melka, F, "Receptive vs. Productive Aspects of Vocabulary In: Vocabulary, Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy", pp.84~102 (1997), CUP
  12. Nation, I. S. P, "Teaching and Learning Vocabulary" (1990), Heinle & Heinle
  13. Palmberg, R, "What Makes a Word English? Swedish Speaking Learners' Feeling of Englishness?", AILA Review, 6, pp.47~55 (1989)
  14. Snellings, P, "Validating a Test of Second Language Written Lexical Retrieval: A New Measure of Fluency in Written Language Production", Language Testing, 21, pp.174~201 (2004)
  15. "Scales of Vocabulary Knowledge in Second Language Vocabulary Assessment"[URL]
  16. Webb, S, "Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Learning: The Effects of Reading and Writing on Word Knowledge", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, pp.33~52 (2005)
  17. Webb, S, "The Effects of Synonymy on Second-language Vocabulary Learning", Reading in a Foreign Language, 19, pp.120~136 (2007)
  18. Webb, S, "Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Sizes of L2 Learners", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, pp.79~95 (2008)
  19. Wesche, M, "Assessing Second Language Vocabulary Knowledge: Depth versus Breadth", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, pp.13~40 (1996)
  20. Zareva, A, "Models of Lexical Knowledge Assessment of Second Language Learners of English at Higher Levels of Language Proficiency", System, 33, pp.547~562 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)