Interactional Metadiscourse in Editorials: A Cross-Cultural Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explored potential cross-cultural differences between English newspaper editorials written by Korean writers and those by native writers of English in the distribution of interactional metadiscourse. Two elite newspapers, The Korea Herald (n=60) and The New York Times (n=70), were adopted as corpora, using Hyland’s interpersonal model of metadiscourse to compare them in the writers' use of interactional metadiscourse to construct a public opinion in interaction with readers. Findings showed that native English writers used more diverse types of interactional metadiscourse than Korean writers. In regard to cultural differences, Korean editors’ extensive use of Korean(s) and inclusive-we displayed their collective social identity, whereas native writers' showed their internal argumentation with rhetorical questions and you. Some pedagogical implications, such as a direct instruction of metadiscourse, intercultural writing instruction, and genre- based instruction, are suggested.
Abstract
This study explored potential cross-cultural differences between English newspaper editorials written by Korean writers and those by native writers of English in the distribution of interactional metadiscourse. Two elite newspapers, The Korea Herald (n=60) and The New York Times (n=70), were adopted as corpora, using Hyland’s interpersonal model of metadiscourse to compare them in the writers' use of interactional metadiscourse to construct a public opinion in interaction with readers. Findings showed that native English writers used more diverse types of interactional metadiscourse than Korean writers. In regard to cultural differences, Korean editors’ extensive use of Korean(s) and inclusive-we displayed their collective social identity, whereas native writers' showed their internal argumentation with rhetorical questions and you. Some pedagogical implications, such as a direct instruction of metadiscourse, intercultural writing instruction, and genre- based instruction, are suggested.
참고문헌 (30)
- Abdi, Reza, "Interpersonal Metadiscourse: An Indicator of Interaction and Identity", Discourse Studies, 4(2), pp.139~145 (2002)
- Ansary, Hasan, "A Cross-Cultural Analysis of English Newspaper Editorials", RELC Journal, 40(2), pp.211~249 (2009)
- "AntConc" (2016)[URL]
- 배지영, "A Corpus-Based Study of Hedging in L2 College Students’ Writings of Different Genres", 언어과학, 23(4), pp.175~201 (2016), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- Çandarli, Duygu, "Journal of English for Academic Purposes Authorial Presence in L1 and L2 Novice Academic Writing: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, pp.192~202 (2015)
- EFL Teacher’s Course, "The Grammar Book: An ESL", pp.1999, Celce-Murcia, Marianne
- Dafouz-Milne, Emma, "The Pragmatic Role of Textual and Interpersonal Metadiscourse Markers in the Construction and Attainment of Persuasion: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Newspaper Discourse", Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), pp.95~113 (2008)
- Fu, Xiaoli, "Interaction in Two Journalistic Genres: A Study of Interactional Metadiscourse", English Text Construction, 7(1), pp.122~144 (2014)
- Gillaerts, Paul, "Interactional Metadiscourse in Research Article Abstracts", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), pp.128~139 (2010)
- Halliday, Michael, "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
- Hyland, Ken, "Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse", Journal of Pragmatics, 30, pp.437~455 (1998)
- Hyland, Ken, "Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing" (2000), Longman
- Hyland, Ken, "Authority and Invisibility: Authorial Identity in Academic Writing", Journal of Pragmatics, 34(8), pp.1091~1112 (2002)
- Hyland, Ken, "Disciplinary Interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 Postgraduate Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, pp.133~151 (2004)
- Hyland, Ken, "Metadiscourse" (2005), Continuum
- Hyland, Ken, "Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse", Discourse Studies, 7(2), pp.173~192 (2005)
- Hyland, Ken, "Metadiscourse: What Is It and Where Is It Going?", Journal of Pragmatics, 113, pp.16~29 (2017)
- Hyland, Ken, "Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal", Applied Linguistics, 25(2), pp.156~177 (2004)
- , 2019
- Jon, Jae-Eun, "Power Dynamics with International Students: From the Perspective of Domestic Students in Korean Higher Education", Higher Education, 64(4), pp.441~454 (2012)
- 김철규, "코퍼스에 기반한 영국 신문의 논설문과 한국 대학생의 영어 논설문에 사용된 메타담화(metadiscourse) 비교 연구", 담화와 인지, 16(3), pp.65~88 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 김혜경, "The Use of Metadiscourse in Korean University Students’ Persuasive Essays", 현대영어교육, 15(3), pp.142~162 (2014), 현대영어교육학회
- Le, Elisabeth, "Active Participation within Written Argumentation: Metadiscourse and Editorialist’s Authority", Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), pp.687~714 (2004)
- Lee, Joseph J., "Interactions in L1 and L2 Undergraduate Student Writing: Interactional Metadiscourse in Successful and Less-successful Argumentative Essays", Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, pp.21~34 (2016)
- 이성용, "Metadiscourse and Writer Identity: A Longitudinal Case Study of a Korean L2 Writer in the US", 현대영어영문학, 60(3), pp.129~150 (2016), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 이성용, "Interactions in Persuasive Writing: Comparative Analysis of L2 Essays and L1 Columns", 언어과학연구, (83), pp.253~273 (2017), 언어과학회[DOI]
- Matsuda, Paul Kei, "Voice in Academic Writing: The Rhetorical Construction of Author Identity in Blind Manuscript Review", English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), pp.235~249 (2007)
- 엄철주, "영어 L1과 L2 사용자의 학술 논문에 나타난 상위담화 비교 분석", 담화와 인지, 16(2), pp.63~90 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Yeganeh, Maryam Tafaroji, "Hedge and Booster in Newspaper Articles on Iran’s Presidential Election: A Comparative Study of English and Persian Articles", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, pp.679~683 (2015)
- Yoon, Hyung-Jo, "Textual Voice Elements and Voice Strength in EFL Argumentative Writing", Assessing Writing, 32, pp.72~84 (2017)