본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정성적 연구를 통한 온라인 친사회적 행동의 동기 요인 탐색

An Exploratory Study on Online Prosocial Behavior

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Cyberbullying, i.e., posting malicious comments online, has been identified as a critical issue in the online and social media context. It has become prevalent on a global scale, which happens across all ages. As a way to reduce and prevent cyberbullying, it is important to promote online prosocial behavior. In line with the concept of online prosocial behavior, we suggest posting benevolent comments against posting malicious comments as a new type of online prosocial behavior, which can combat cyberbullying and facilitate positive online culture. This study thus aims to analyze what motivates people to post benevolent comments in the online context. Based on interview methods, we extracted seven driving factors (self-presentation, pleasure, social contribution, emotional support, reputation, monetary reward, and reciprocity) and two inhibiting factors (social anxiety and effort) of posting benevolent comments online. This study has its theoretical contribution in exploring the motivation factors leading to the posting of benevolent comments by extending the concept of online prosocial behavior. It also has its practical implications by providing guidance for promoting prosocial behavior in the online context.

Abstract

Cyberbullying, i.e., posting malicious comments online, has been identified as a critical issue in the online and social media context. It has become prevalent on a global scale, which happens across all ages. As a way to reduce and prevent cyberbullying, it is important to promote online prosocial behavior. In line with the concept of online prosocial behavior, we suggest posting benevolent comments against posting malicious comments as a new type of online prosocial behavior, which can combat cyberbullying and facilitate positive online culture. This study thus aims to analyze what motivates people to post benevolent comments in the online context. Based on interview methods, we extracted seven driving factors (self-presentation, pleasure, social contribution, emotional support, reputation, monetary reward, and reciprocity) and two inhibiting factors (social anxiety and effort) of posting benevolent comments online. This study has its theoretical contribution in exploring the motivation factors leading to the posting of benevolent comments by extending the concept of online prosocial behavior. It also has its practical implications by providing guidance for promoting prosocial behavior in the online context.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. 강재정, "온라인 커뮤니티 시민행동, 신뢰, 보상이 정보공헌에 미치는 영향", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 12(2), pp.85~108 (2012), 한국인터넷전자상거래학회[DOI]
  2. 권상집, "기업가적 의지, 조직학습, 기술", 시장 변화에 의한 대학발 창업 벤처기업의 기회실현 과정: i-KAIST 탐색적 사례연구, 2013, pp.14(5), 55~80[DOI]
  3. 김경규, "온라인 커뮤니티에서 조직시민행동의 영향요인이 지식공헌에 미치는 영향", 지식경영연구, 10(2), pp.105~119 (2009), 한국지식경영학회
  4. 김수정, "인터넷에서의 친사회적 행동에 영향을 미치는 요인 : 미국드라마 자막제작자를 중심으로", 사회과학 담론과 정책, 6(1), pp.81~106 (2013)
  5. 박성훈, "SNS를 이용한 청소년 사이버불링의 실태 및 대응방안 모색", 형사정책연구 소식, (여름) (2014)
  6. "사이버불링, 예방교육이 먼저다"[URL]
  7. "카톡 '재초대 거부 기능' 추가…'사이버왕따' 해결 미흡"[URL]
  8. 전병호, "기업주도형 커뮤니티의 성공요인에 관한 탐색적 연구:커뮤니티 운영자 관점에서", 지식경영연구, 9(2), pp.15~34 (2008), 한국지식경영학회
  9. 2011년 인터넷윤리문화 실태조사, "정경호", 한국인터넷진흥원, ~ (2011)
  10. "'카톡감옥' 방지 법안, 사이버왕따 해소될까"[URL]
  11. 정완, "사이버폭력의 피해실태와 대응방안", 피해자학연구, 13(2), pp.329~359 (2005), 한국피해자학회
  12. "선플이 학교폭력 확 줄였어요" (2013)[URL]
  13. "1년간 왕따 시달린 美10대, 결국 세상 등져"[URL]
  14. "왕따보다 무서운 '카톡감옥' 그만 …대화방 초대 때 동의 의무화 추진"[URL]
  15. 최은수, "정보기술이 지식경영활동에 미치는 영향: 만도와 포스코 사례를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 9(2), pp.169~191 (2008), 한국지식경영학회
  16. 하성욱, "Promoting Uncertain Exploration:A Case Study", 지식경영연구, 10(1), pp.53~70 (2009), 한국지식경영학회
  17. 현경택, "기업의 지식경영 실행에 관한 질적 연구 : S기업의 지식경영 실천 사례", 지식경영연구, 11(1), pp.129~146 (2010), 한국지식경영학회
  18. Abu-Nimeh, S., "Malicious and spam posts in online social networks", Computer, 44(9), pp.23~28 (2011)
  19. Adams, M. E., "Enhancing New Product Development Performance : An Organizational Learning Perspective", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, pp.403~422 (1998)
  20. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., "Potential and promise of online volunteering", Computers in Human Behavior, 24, pp.544~562 (2008)
  21. Aoyama , I ., "Adolescent Online Social Communication and Behavior: Relationship Formation on the Internet", pp.183~201 (2010), Information Science
  22. "Cyberbullying Peaks Among Midd le S cho olers"[URL]
  23. Bar-tal, D., "Prosocial behavior : Theory and research" (1976), John Wiley
  24. Barton, E. J., "Modification of children's prosocial behavior" (1986), Academic Press
  25. Beale, A. V., "Cyberbullying : What School Administrators(and Parents)Can Do", The Clearing House : A Journal of Educational Strategies, 81(1), pp.8~12 (2007)
  26. Bhat, C. S., "Cyber Bullying : Overview and Strategies for School Counsellors, Guidance Officers, and All School Personnel", Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 18(1), pp.53~66 (2008)
  27. Bock, G. W., "Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing : Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, socialpsychological forces, and organizational climate", MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.87~111 (2005)
  28. Brown, C. F., "Cyber victimization in middle school and relations to social emotional outcomes", Computers (2014)
  29. Cetlin B, Yaman E,, "Cyber victim and bullying scale : A study of validity and reliability", Computers and Education, 57(4), pp.2261~2271 (2011)
  30. Constant, D., "The Kindness of Strangers : The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice", Organization Science, 7(2), pp.119~135 (1996)
  31. Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches" (2007), Sage
  32. Dávila, M. C., "Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Well-being : Preliminary Results", International Journal of Applied Psychology, 3(3), pp.45~41 (2013)
  33. Diamanduros, T., "The Role of School Psychologists in the Assessment, Prevention, and Intervention of Cyberbullying", Psychology in the Schools, 45(8), pp.693~704 (2008)
  34. Donath, J. S., "Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community, in Communities in Cyberspace", pp.29~59 (1999), Routledge
  35. Dovidio, J. F., "The social psychology of prosocial behavior" (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
  36. Dredge, R., "Cyberbullying in social networking sites: An adolescent victim’s perspective", Computers in Human Behavior, (36), pp.13~20 (2014)
  37. Eagly, A. H., "The his or hers of prosocial behavior : An examination of the social psychology of gender", American Psychologist, 64(8), pp.644~658 (2009)
  38. Hinduja, S., "Bullying, Cyberbullying, and Suicide", Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), pp.206~221 (2010)
  39. Kankanhalli, A., "Contributing knowledge to electronic k nowledge repositor ies : A n empi r ica l investigation", MIS Quarterly, 29(1), pp.113~143 (2005)
  40. Keith, S., "Cyber-Bullying : Creating a Culture of Respect in a Cyber world", Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13(4), pp.224~228 (2005)
  41. Kwan, G. C. E., "Facebook bullying : An extension of battles in school", Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), pp.16~25 (2013)
  42. Lincoln, Y. S., "Naturalistic inquiry" (1985), Sage
  43. Ma, M., "Through a glass darkly : Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge c ont r ibut ion i n on l i ne commu n it ie s", Information Systems Research, 18, pp.42~67 (2007)
  44. Mason, K. L., "Cyberbully : APreliminary Assessment for School Personnel", Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), pp.323~348 (2008)
  45. Miles, M. B., "Thousand Oaks" (1994), Sage Publications
  46. Molm, L. D., "Coercive power in social exchange" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  47. Mussen, P., "Roots of caring, sharing, and helping: The development of pro-social behavior in children" (1977), W. H. Freeman
  48. Orga n, D. W., "Organizational citizenship behavior : Its nature, antecedents, and conseque ces" (2006), Sage Publications
  49. Osterloh, M., "Open source software development—Just another case of collective invention?", Research Policy, 36(2), pp.157~171 (2007)
  50. Slonje, R., "The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevent ion", Computers i n Huma n Behavior, 29(1), pp.26~32 (2013)
  51. Smith, A., "Organizational citizenship behavior : Its nature and antecedents", Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), pp.653~663 (1983)
  52. Sproull, L., "Prosocial behavior on the net, The social net : The Social Psychology of the Internet", pp.139~161 (2005), Oxford University Press
  53. Talwar, V., "Adolescents’ moral evaluations and ratings of cyberbullying: The effect of veracity and intentionality behind the event", Computers in Human Behavior, 36, pp.122~128 (2014)
  54. Vandebosch, H., "Def in ing c yberbu lly ing : A qua litat ive research into the perceptions of youngsters", CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(4), pp.499~503 (2008)
  55. Wang, C., "Helping others in online games: Prosocial behavior in Cyberspace", CyberPsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking, 11, pp.344~346 (2008)
  56. Wasko, M. M., "‘It Is What One Does’ : Why People Participate and Help Others in Electronic Communities of Practice", Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2), pp.155~173 (2000)
  57. Wright, M., "The associations between young adults’ face-to-face prosocial behaviors and their online prosocial behaviors", Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), pp.1959~1962 (2011)
  58. Yew, J. C., "Social Performances : A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding Online Prosocial Behavior", 박사, pp.2011
  59. Yin, R. K., "Case study research : Design and method" (2003), Sage

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)