본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

진성 리더십, 상사 신뢰, 심리적 웰빙, 지식공유 간의구조적 관계 분석

Analysis of Structural Relationships between Authentic Leadership, Trust in Leaders, Psychological Well-Being, and Knowledge Sharing

정지용|권상집
한국지식경영학회 (The Knowledge Management Society of Korea)|2016.12|지식경영연구 (Knowledge Management Research)|제17권 제4호|pp. 1-26|DOI 10.15813/kmr.2016.17.4.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

23

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Psychological Well-beingAuthentic LeadershipKnowledge SharingTrust for Leaders
주제분류경영학

초록

The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between authentic leadership, trust in leaders, psychological well-being, and knowledge sharing. Authentic leadership advocates a positive and interactional approach for leaders and subordinates. Authentic leaders are those who are aware of their values and beliefs, maintain their personal goals, and support their followers. Such leaders’ behaviors boost psychological well-being, knowledge sharing, and trust. A research framework is constructed to investigate the research hypotheses. Survey data are obtained from mid-sized companies of 164 employees to analyze the proposed framework. The sample consists of 101 males and 63 females. In particular, this study designs a robust research method to assess model fit and to avoid common method-bias issues. The empirical results of this study are as follows: Authentic leadership has a positive influence on trust in leaders and psychological well-being. Trust in leaders has a positive impact on psychological wellbeing and knowledge sharing. In addition, followers’ psychological well-being influences knowledge sharing activities. This study contributes to the comprehension of the structural relationships between authentic leadership, trust in leaders, psychological well-being, and knowledge sharing. This study suggests that authentic leadership and trust in leaders are key success factors that relate to the important variables of positive mindset and capability, such as followers’ psychological well-being and knowledge-sharing activities.

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between authentic leadership, trust in leaders, psychological well-being, and knowledge sharing. Authentic leadership advocates a positive and interactional approach for leaders and subordinates. Authentic leaders are those who are aware of their values and beliefs, maintain their personal goals, and support their followers. Such leaders’ behaviors boost psychological well-being, knowledge sharing, and trust. A research framework is constructed to investigate the research hypotheses. Survey data are obtained from mid-sized companies of 164 employees to analyze the proposed framework. The sample consists of 101 males and 63 females. In particular, this study designs a robust research method to assess model fit and to avoid common method-bias issues. The empirical results of this study are as follows: Authentic leadership has a positive influence on trust in leaders and psychological well-being. Trust in leaders has a positive impact on psychological wellbeing and knowledge sharing. In addition, followers’ psychological well-being influences knowledge sharing activities. This study contributes to the comprehension of the structural relationships between authentic leadership, trust in leaders, psychological well-being, and knowledge sharing. This study suggests that authentic leadership and trust in leaders are key success factors that relate to the important variables of positive mindset and capability, such as followers’ psychological well-being and knowledge-sharing activities.

참고문헌 (73)

  1. 권상집, "서번트 리더십이 조직 구성원의 지식공유와 창의성에 미치는 영향: 정서적 몰입의 매개효과", 지식경영연구, 17(1), pp.89~109 (2016), 한국지식경영학회
  2. 권정언, "진성 리더십이 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향: 정서적 몰입의 매개효과를 중심으로", 기업교육과인재연구, 17(2), pp.107~127 (2015), 한국기업교육학회
  3. 김기흥, "상사신뢰가 구성원의 지식공유와 창의성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 내재적 동기부여의 매개효과 -", 인적자원관리연구, 22(2), pp.39~63 (2015), 한국인적자원관리학회[DOI]
  4. 김문주, "학습조직의 세 가지 메커니즘:지식 공유, 생산적인 담론, 그리고 정체성 공유가 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향", 조직과 인사관리연구, 36(1), pp.31~65 (2012), 한국인사관리학회
  5. 김승용, "임파워링 리더십이 구성원의 지식공유와 내재적 동기부여에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰 매개를 중심으로", 지식경영연구, 14(2), pp.89~116 (2013), 한국지식경영학회
  6. 김흥길, "조직웰빙(OWB)의 개념화와 척도 개발에 관한 연구", 인적자원관리연구, 17(4), pp.325~344 (2010), 한국인적자원관리학회
  7. 박문수, "지식공유의 영향요인: 연구동향과 과제", 지식경영연구, 2(1), pp.1~23 (2001)
  8. 윤정구, "진정성이란 무엇인가" (2012), 한언
  9. 이경근, "상사의 비인격적 감독과 부하의 조직시민행동 차원 간의 관계에서 상사신뢰의 매개효과", 인적자원관리연구, 17(3), pp.173~192 (2010), 한국인적자원관리학회
  10. 이관응, "신뢰경영" (1999), 엘테크
  11. 정예지, "진성 리더십이 팀 효과성에 미치는영향에 관한 연구: 팀 에너지와 팀 효능감의 매개효과를 중심으로", 대한리더십학회 춘계학술대회발표논문집, pp.71~104 (2012)
  12. 정예지, "진성 리더십이 심리적 웰빙과 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 팀 에너지의 매개효과를 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 37(2), pp.181~216 (2013), 한국인사관리학회
  13. 정예지, "변혁적 리더 대 진성 리더: 변혁적 리더십의 재조명", 경영학연구, 41(3), pp.539~573 (2012), 한국경영학회[DOI]
  14. 최우재, "진성리더십이 부하의 심리적 웰빙과 적응적 수행성과에 미치는 영향 : 자기권능감의 매개효과", 인사조직연구, 21(1), pp.185~228 (2013), 한국인사조직학회
  15. 탁진국, "신입사원의 이직의도에 영향을 미치는 작업환경 변수에 관한 연구", 응용통계연구, 21(3), pp.469~484 (2008), 한국통계학회
  16. 홍성화, "중소기업 최고경영자의 오센틱 리더십이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향", 기업교육과인재연구, 13(2), pp.1~29 (2011), 한국기업교육학회
  17. Ashforth, B. E, "Petty tyranny in organizations", Human Relations, 47, pp.755~778 (1994)
  18. Avey, J. B., "Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 15, pp.17~28 (2010)
  19. Avolio, B. J., "Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership", Leadership Quarterly, 16, pp.315~338 (2005)
  20. Bagozzi, R. P., "On the evaluation of structural equation models", Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 16, pp.74~94 (1988)
  21. Baker, W., "Positive organizational scholoarship", pp.328~342 (2003), Berrett-Koehler Publishers
  22. Bandura, A., "Social learning theory" (1977), Prince Hall
  23. Barsade, S. G., "The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence in group behavior", Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, pp.644~675 (2002)
  24. Bass, B. M., "Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior", Leadership Quarterly, 10, pp.181~207 (1999)
  25. Browne, M. W., "Testing structural equation models", pp.136~162 (1993), Sage
  26. Brown, M. E., "Ethical leadership: A review and future directions", Leadership Quarterly, 17, pp.595~616 (2006)
  27. Butler, J. K., "A behavioral decision theory approach to modeling dynamic trust in superiors and subordinates", Psychological Reports, 55, pp.19~28 (1984)
  28. Cabrera, A., "Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, pp.245~264 (2006)
  29. Cabrera, E. F., "Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices", International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, pp.720~735 (2005)
  30. Cameron, K. S., "Positive organizational scholarship" (2003), Berrett- Koehler Publishers
  31. Chowdhury, S., "The role of affect-and cognition-based trust in complex knowledge sharing", Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, pp.310~326 (2005)
  32. Dayan, M., "Managerial trust in new product development projects: Its antecedents and consequences", R&D Management, 39, pp.21~37 (2009)
  33. Deci, E. L., "Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, pp.54~67 (2000)
  34. Fornell, C., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.39~50 (1981)
  35. Foss, N. J., "Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters", Human Resource Management, 48, pp.871~893 (2009)
  36. Fu, P., "Pursuit of whose happiness? Executive leaders’ transformational behaviors and personal values", Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, pp.222~254 (2010)
  37. Gardner, W. L., "Can you see the real me: A self-based model of authentic and follower development", Leadership Quarterly, 16, pp.343~372 (2005)
  38. Gardner, W. L., "Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity?", Leadership Quarterly, 20, pp.466~482 (2009)
  39. Gardner, W. L., "Unleashing individual potential: Performance gains through positive organizational behavior and authentic leadership", Organizational Dynamics, 33, pp.270~281 (2004)
  40. Hair, J. F., "Multivariate data analysis" (2006), Prentice- Hall
  41. Hofmann, D. A., "Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange", Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, pp.286~296 (1999)
  42. Holbert, R. L., "Str uctura l equation modeling in t he communication sciences 1995-2000", Human Communications Research, 28, pp.531~551 (2002)
  43. Hooff, B., "Committed to share: Commitment and CMC (Computer mediated communication) use as antecedents of knowledge sharing", Knowledge and Process Management, 11, pp.13~24 (2004)
  44. Huang, X., "Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, pp.122~143 (2010)
  45. Ilies, R., "Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader-follower outcomes", Leadership Quarterly, 16, pp.373~394 (2005)
  46. Khazanchi, S., "Who and what is fair matters: A multi-foci social exchange model of creativity", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, pp.86~106 (2011)
  47. Kwon, S., "What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter", Social Science Journal, 51, pp.534~544 (2014)
  48. Kwon, S., "Innovation activities and the creation of new employment: An empirical assessment of South Korea’s manufacturing industry", Social Science Information, 54, pp.354~368 (2015)
  49. Lewicki, R. J., "Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch" (1996), Jossey-Bass
  50. Lord, R. G., "Leadership process and follower identity" (2004), Lawerence Erlbaum Associates
  51. Luthans, F., "Positive organizational scholarship", pp.241~259 (2003), Berrett-Koehler Publishers
  52. McEvily, B., "Trust as an organizing principle", Organization Science, 14, pp.91~103 (2003)
  53. Menard, J., "Authenticity and well-being in the workplace: A mediation model", Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, pp.331~346 (2010)
  54. Northouse, P. G., "Leadership: Theory and practice" (2010), Sage
  55. Osterloh, M., "Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms", Organization Science, 11, pp.538~550 (2010)
  56. Peterson, S. J., "The relationship between authentic leadership and follower job performance: The mediating role of follower positivity in extreme context", Leadership Quarterly, 23, pp.502~516 (2012)
  57. Podsakoff, P. M., "Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors", Leadership Quarterly, 1, pp.107~142 (1990)
  58. Price, M. E, "Pro-community altruism and social status in a Shuar village", Human Nature, 14, pp.191~208 (2003)
  59. Rath, T., "Well-being: The five essential elements" (2010), The Gall-Up Press
  60. Reinholt, M., "Why a central network position isn’t enough: The role of motivation and ability for knowledge sharing in employee networks", Academy of Management Journal, 54, pp.1277~1297 (2011)
  61. Robert, K. H., "Failures in upward communications in organizations: Three possible culprits", Academy of Management Journal, 17, pp.205~215 (1974)
  62. Robertson, I. T., "The Oxford handbook on organizational well-being", pp.159~179 (2009), Oxford University Press
  63. Ryan, R. M., "On happiness and human potential: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing", Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp.141~166 (2001)
  64. Ryff, C. D., "The str ucture of psychologica l well-being revisited", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, pp.719~727 (1995)
  65. Shamir, B., "What’s your story?: A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development", Leadership Quarterly, 16, pp.395~417 (2005)
  66. Shamir, B., "The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory", Organization Science, 4, pp.577~594 (1993)
  67. Sorkin, A. R., "Too big to fail" (2010), Penguin Group
  68. Sparrowe, R. T, "Authentic leadership and the narrative self", Leadership Quarterly, 16, pp.419~439 (2005)
  69. Steenkamp, J. E. M., "The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8, pp.283~299 (1991)
  70. Tabachnick, B. G., "Using multivariate statistics" (1996), HarperCollins College Publishers
  71. Tepper, B. J, "Abusive supervision in organizations", Journal of Management, 33, pp.261~289 (2007)
  72. Walumbwa, F., "Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure", Journal of Management, 34, pp.89~126 (2008)
  73. Whitener, E. M., "Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior", Academy of Management Review, 23, pp.513~530 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

진성 리더십이 조직 동일시와 조직 몰입을 통해 지식공유 의도에 미치는 영향: 상호피드백과 업무 상호의존성 조절효과 분석황인호한국벤처창업학회 · 벤처창업연구2021 · 제16권 제6호Effect of Authentic Leadership on Organizational Citizenship Behaviors through Mediating Roles of Followers’ Self-awareness and Psychological Ownership탁진국, Hyo-Sung Oh한국유통과학회 · 유통과학연구2016 · 제14권 제3호임파워링 리더십이 구성원의 지식공유와 내재적 동기부여에 미치는 영향: 상사신뢰 매개를 중심으로김기흥, 김승용, 이병철한국지식경영학회 · 지식경영연구2013 · 제14권 제2호Authentic Leadership - Empirical Tests of Its Effects on Employees and Mediating Mechanisms -김혜경한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2014 · 제21권 제4호The Effects of Authentic Leadership on Psychological Well-being and Job Performance - Focused on Airline Flight Attendants고선희한국융합학회 · 한국융합학회논문지2019 · 제10권 제9호진성리더십이 상사신뢰 및 심리적 주인의식에 미치는 영향 연구 - LMX의 조절된 매개효과를 중심으로 -김일, 류태모, 송경수한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2019 · 제26권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

전통시장 상인회의 조직특성이 사회적 자본과 상인회 조직성과에 미치는 영향신택수, 김민숙pp. 27-56지식포럼 참가동기 요인과 재참가 의도에 미치는 영향: 골프레이밍 이론을 적용하여구철모, 김종철pp. 57-76R&D 인력의 사회적 네트워크와 자아존중감이 조직몰입과 경력지향성에 미치는 영향이동백, 박성환, 강민형pp. 77-104이사회 독립성과 이사회 관여: 정보 제공 및 공유를 중심으로윤현중pp. 105-127인스타그램에서 사회적 관계 형성을 위한 사진 공유에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구엄태휘, 구철모, 정남호pp. 128-146
원문 보기