한국어능력시험(TOPIK) 고급형 문제지의 오류 분석
Error Analysis of the Test Paper for the Advanced Level in the Test of Proficiency in Korean.
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyze linguistic errors on the test paper of vocabulary, grammar and writing among the advanced: Level 5 and Level 6 stages of the Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK). The result of reviewing the errors on the test paper of vocabulary, grammar and writing for the advanced level in the TOPIK proved that errors were mainly found in vocabulary, grammar and writing. In vocabulary, there were many errors using 1) the repeated use of the forementioned vocabulary, 2) the use of inappropriate semantic vocabulary. Grammatically, there were many errors: 1) the tense, 2) the use of the spoken language, 3) the use of redundant passive and causative verbs, 4) the constituent pats of the sentence, 5) the inappropriate responses. Errors with writing were discovered as well. These errors consisted of: 1) an inconsistency in the spacing of words throughout the document, 2) many simple mistakes, as well as the wrong definition of the passage. Analyzing the document resulted in the discovery of ninety errors. Among the ninety errors, thirty-six were attributed to errors in the use of vocabulary. Thirty- seven errors were attributed to grammatical misuse. Sixteen errors were the result of word spacing errors, leaving one error due to the wrong definition. These errors mostly happen due to the question passage driven by the spoken language, or because there is no system of obvious error analysis in place. Because TOPIK is the representative Korean language test, it must prepare a more accurate and organized system for error analysis than any other tests, after that, the test will be completed.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze linguistic errors on the test paper of vocabulary, grammar and writing among the advanced: Level 5 and Level 6 stages of the Test of Proficiency in Korean (TOPIK). The result of reviewing the errors on the test paper of vocabulary, grammar and writing for the advanced level in the TOPIK proved that errors were mainly found in vocabulary, grammar and writing. In vocabulary, there were many errors using 1) the repeated use of the forementioned vocabulary, 2) the use of inappropriate semantic vocabulary. Grammatically, there were many errors: 1) the tense, 2) the use of the spoken language, 3) the use of redundant passive and causative verbs, 4) the constituent pats of the sentence, 5) the inappropriate responses. Errors with writing were discovered as well. These errors consisted of: 1) an inconsistency in the spacing of words throughout the document, 2) many simple mistakes, as well as the wrong definition of the passage. Analyzing the document resulted in the discovery of ninety errors. Among the ninety errors, thirty-six were attributed to errors in the use of vocabulary. Thirty- seven errors were attributed to grammatical misuse. Sixteen errors were the result of word spacing errors, leaving one error due to the wrong definition. These errors mostly happen due to the question passage driven by the spoken language, or because there is no system of obvious error analysis in place. Because TOPIK is the representative Korean language test, it must prepare a more accurate and organized system for error analysis than any other tests, after that, the test will be completed.
참고문헌 (11)
- 강소산, "한국어능력시험의 듣기 문항 분석", 석사, pp.2009
- 김영주, "영어권 고급학습자들의 조사 및 동사 어미 사용 - 오류 분석", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 31, pp.129~152 (2006), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 한국어능력시험의 등급 부여 방식 및 평가 문항 유형 개선 방안 연구, "김정숙", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2004)
- 한국어능력시험 개선 방안 연구, "남명호", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (1999)
- 서희정, "한국어능력시험 쓰기 영역 문항 개발에 관한 연구-주관식 문항 유형을 중심으로", 고황논총, 37, pp.13~32 (2005), 경희대학교
- 석주연, "한국어 학습자 표현 오류분석의 몇 가지 문제", 한국어교육, 14(3), pp.8~216 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이은경, "한국어능력시험에서의 문법 평가 연구", 교육, 3, pp.199~231 (2005), 한국문법교육학회
- 이해영, "한국어능력시험의 현황과 개선 방안", 국어교육학연구, (20), pp.197~236 (2004), 국어교육학회
- 이해영, "한국어 이해능력 평가의 원리 및 실제", 한국어교육, 16(3), pp.275~304 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
- 지현숙, "한국어 인터뷰 시험 담화에서 나타난 구어 문법적 오류 분석", 한국어교육, 17(3), pp.301~323 (2006), 국제한국어교육학회
- 홍은진, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 어휘 오류 분석과 교육 방안", 이중언어학, (25), pp.331~358 (2004), 이중언어학회
