본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공유수면 인공구조물 설치에 따른 해역이용협의서 작성실태 평가

Assessment of Documentation Status of the Statement on the Sea Area Utilization according to Artificial Structure Installation in Public Water

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

This study assessed documentation status of each environmental assessment items by analyzing the 243 case of marine EIS on the Consultation System of Sea Area Utilization. Observed rate of tidal elevation, current, temperature, salinity in maine environment were below 20%. The EFDC tool is applied substantially in hydrodynamic modeling. The verification process, however, is very insufficient using the recent observed data. Also, in-situ assessment rate of pelagic organism such as phytoplankton was below 50%, and assessment for Chlorophyll a was not accomplished. Ecological index evaluation for zooplankton and benthic ecosystem were not considered in statements. Especially, the rational assessment on the fisheries resources and protected species were very limited. It was necessary that the core assessment items (checklists) were established for environmental scoping. Furthermore, suggestion of information related to development, regional coastal management plan, aquaculture farms, and facilities were enhanced. The redundancy problem of proceedings between Environmental Impact Assessment and Sea Area Utilization Assessment System was improved.

Abstract

This study assessed documentation status of each environmental assessment items by analyzing the 243 case of marine EIS on the Consultation System of Sea Area Utilization. Observed rate of tidal elevation, current, temperature, salinity in maine environment were below 20%. The EFDC tool is applied substantially in hydrodynamic modeling. The verification process, however, is very insufficient using the recent observed data. Also, in-situ assessment rate of pelagic organism such as phytoplankton was below 50%, and assessment for Chlorophyll a was not accomplished. Ecological index evaluation for zooplankton and benthic ecosystem were not considered in statements. Especially, the rational assessment on the fisheries resources and protected species were very limited. It was necessary that the core assessment items (checklists) were established for environmental scoping. Furthermore, suggestion of information related to development, regional coastal management plan, aquaculture farms, and facilities were enhanced. The redundancy problem of proceedings between Environmental Impact Assessment and Sea Area Utilization Assessment System was improved.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 국토해양부, "해역이용협의서 작성 등에 관한 규정", 국토해양부고시 제2009-793호, ~ (2009)
  2. 유형별 평가기준 개발연구(I) 최종보고서, "국토해양부", ~ (2009)
  3. 해역이용행위 유형별 평가기준 개발연구(II) 최종보고서, "국토해양부", ~ (2010)
  4. 국토해양부, "실무자 중심의 해역이용협의 및 평가제도 길라잡이", 315~ (2012)
  5. 국토해양부, "공유수면 관리 및 매립에 관한 법률", ~ (2013)
  6. 국토해양부, "해양개발·이용행위 꾸준히 증가", 국토해양부 보도자료, ~ (2013)
  7. 2012년도 해역이용영향검토기관 운영 최종보고서, "국토해양부", ~ (2013)
  8. 이대인, "해역이용협의제도 운용 현황 분석 및 실효성 제고방안", 한국해양환경•에너지학회지, 14(4), pp.239~248 (2011), 한국해양환경·에너지학회
  9. 이대인, "해양환경영향평가 관련 협의에 의한 연안이용분석", 환경영향평가, 17(2), pp.97~103 (2008), 한국환경영향평가학회
  10. 한국해양연구원, "환경영향 평가서 해양부분 검토 지침서", ~ (2002)
  11. 환경부, "사업유형별 평가서 작성을 위한 환경영향평가서 작성 가이드라인(안)", ~ (2007)
  12. 환경부, "환경영향평가법", ~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)