韓․日語の感覚擬態語の副詞的用法に関する考察 - かたさを表す擬態語を中心に -
A contrastive study on the adverbial use of sensory mimetic words between Korean and Japanese - Focused on the mimetic words of hardness
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we conducted a comparative analysis on the adverbial usage of mimetic words about hardness which represent tactile sense between Korean and Japanese. In the function of onomatopoeia mimetic words in both languages, adverbial functions are the main functions, so we study their classification of the adverbial usage, the difference of each usage between two languages. In Japanese, there are three functions : TO type, NI type, and without anything, and four functions : base, -hake type, -hi type, -i type in Korean. As a result, the most commonly used function is TO type in Japanese, and –hi type in Korean, but this is concentrated on specific vocabulary (mimetic word requiring <hada>). The most frequently used function overall is –hake type. It is found that Japanese mimetic words of hardness have the nature of nouns and adjectives, and can be changed to verbs by conjunction with <suru>. From this point, the change of the part is one of the big characteristic of the mimetic words in Japanese. Among the mimetic words of hardness in Korean, there are not so many words which function as adverbs themselves(ex.calgis, kkongkkong, koseul, kodeul). Mainly they function as adverbs with <hada>. This is one of the characteristic of Korean mimetic word of hardness. As the common points of Korean and Japanese mimetic words, they can be changed to another parts, especially to nouns and adjectives. <Suru> and <hada> play a big role for such a change of parts. But their functions are not the same. <Hada> can change the mimetic words to adjectives and verbs, but <suru> cannot be a adjective.
Abstract
In this paper, we conducted a comparative analysis on the adverbial usage of mimetic words about hardness which represent tactile sense between Korean and Japanese. In the function of onomatopoeia mimetic words in both languages, adverbial functions are the main functions, so we study their classification of the adverbial usage, the difference of each usage between two languages. In Japanese, there are three functions : TO type, NI type, and without anything, and four functions : base, -hake type, -hi type, -i type in Korean. As a result, the most commonly used function is TO type in Japanese, and –hi type in Korean, but this is concentrated on specific vocabulary (mimetic word requiring <hada>). The most frequently used function overall is –hake type. It is found that Japanese mimetic words of hardness have the nature of nouns and adjectives, and can be changed to verbs by conjunction with <suru>. From this point, the change of the part is one of the big characteristic of the mimetic words in Japanese. Among the mimetic words of hardness in Korean, there are not so many words which function as adverbs themselves(ex.calgis, kkongkkong, koseul, kodeul). Mainly they function as adverbs with <hada>. This is one of the characteristic of Korean mimetic word of hardness. As the common points of Korean and Japanese mimetic words, they can be changed to another parts, especially to nouns and adjectives. <Suru> and <hada> play a big role for such a change of parts. But their functions are not the same. <Hada> can change the mimetic words to adjectives and verbs, but <suru> cannot be a adjective.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김홍범, "한국어의 상징어 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
- 민지영, "日․韓両言語における擬音語․擬態語の研究", 博士, pp.2001
- 박동근, "현대국어 흉내말의 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
- 박동근, "흉내말의 낱말 만들기", 한글, 236, pp.137~160 (1997), 한글학회
- 송철휘, "국어의 파생어형성 연구", pp.199~206 (1992), 국어학회 태학사
- 유삼선, "日韓両言語の擬音語․擬態語の対照研究", 博士, pp.2002
- 이은아, "日本{語と韓国語のオノマトペに関する対照研究", 博士, pp.2000
- 채완, "의성어의태어의 통사와 의미", 신국어생활, 3(2), pp.54~72 (1993), 국립국어연구원
- 채완, "한국어의 의성어와 의태어", pp.45~ (2003), 서울대학교출판부
- 青山秀夫, "朝鮮語象徴語辞典", pp.7~20 (1991), 大学書林
- 石垣幸雄, "擬声語擬態語の語構\と語形変化", 言語生活, 171, pp.30~36 (1965), 筑摩書房
- 佐々木文彦, "松村明教授古希記念 国語研究論集", pp.723~736 (1986), 明治書院
- 澤田信恵, "日本語と韓国語の感覚オノマトペ語彙の意味分析-触覚を表\すオノマトペを中心に-", 日本学報, (61), pp.137~150 (2004), 韓国日本学会
- 澤田信恵, "日本語․韓国語の「触覚」を表\す擬態語の意味領域の考察", 日本学報, (76), pp.45~55 (2008), 韓国日本学会
- 田守育啓, "オノマトペー形態と意味", pp.45~144 (1999), くろしお出版
- 西尾寅弥, "形容詞の意味用法の記述的研究", pp.42~199 (1983), 国立国語研究所 集英社出版
- 西尾寅弥, "現代語彙の研究", pp.211~228 (1988), 明治書院
- 宮地裕, "擬音語․擬態語の形態論的小考", 国語学, 115, pp.33~39 (1978), 国語学会
- 楊淑雲, "<擬態語+する", なる>の形式について, 1993, pp.(3), 95~106
- 鷲見幸美, "「擬音語․擬態語+する」動詞の分類", 名古屋大学 人文科学研究, 25, pp.97~119 (1996), 名古屋大学大学院 文学研究科
- HAMANO Shoko, "The Sound-symbolic System of Japanese", 博士, pp.1998
- TSUJI Sanae, "Les impressifs japonais Analyse des gitaigo & inventaire des impressifs japonais", pp.247~257 (2003), Presses Universitaires de Lyon
- "표준국어대사전" (1999), 국립국어원
- "広辞苑" (1997), 岩波新書
- "KAIST Concordance Program"[URL]
