세계화와 문화산업: 브로드웨이 뮤지컬, 글로벌 브랜드
Globalization and Culture Industry: Broadway Musical, the Global Brand
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The idea of a ‘culture industry’ obviously combines culture with economism. In the 1930s, the Frankfurt school used the term in order to indicate the merger of culture and industry in the capitalist mass culture, and it became a flash point of social debate. Today, as a product of the postmodern phase of capitalism searching for ‘marketable difference’ in every corner of the globe, the culture industry formed the socio-economic landscape of our globalization era. In this paper, I examine the socio-cultural meaning of global culture industry of Broadway musical in relation to our Korean musical industry from the perspectives of cultural studies. According to the researchers of cultural studies, globalization refers to the disjunctive flows of people, goods, technologies, capitals, images, etc. Following Arjune Appadurai, I explore the five global flows of musical industry. Globalization is a twofold(multifold) process of global domination and dissemination. In other words, global and local are the two faces of the same movement from one epoch of globalization. Therefore, it is not an easy task to map out the complicated web of trajectories and interactions of globalization, nationalism, and localism transpiring around the production and consumption of musical performances. Nevertheless, cultural studies provide us with tools of explanation and interpretation regarding the global fad for musical performances. Especially, I pay attention to Broadway mega-musicals produced by such multinational corporations as Disney. I assert that we need to take the socio-cultural meaning of Disney musical productions because not only do they influence the public consciousness in the realm of American culture but also they affect the life styles of people from other cultures by disseminating the images of American life styles. Adopting the concept of culture as ‘journey’ or ‘flow,’ I try to sketch the seeming global flow of Broadway musical, rethinking the (im)possibility of emergence of global musical culture. I agree with Anthony Smith in that he rejects the possibility of singular global culture. Since cultures and cultural interactions are so complicated, we need to discuss the global flows in terms of cultural dynamics. In this sense, we can explain why our mainstream mega-musicals contain nationalist propensity. Also, we can make meaning of the emergence of little musical movement and the community-based musical theatre in our nation.
Abstract
The idea of a ‘culture industry’ obviously combines culture with economism. In the 1930s, the Frankfurt school used the term in order to indicate the merger of culture and industry in the capitalist mass culture, and it became a flash point of social debate. Today, as a product of the postmodern phase of capitalism searching for ‘marketable difference’ in every corner of the globe, the culture industry formed the socio-economic landscape of our globalization era. In this paper, I examine the socio-cultural meaning of global culture industry of Broadway musical in relation to our Korean musical industry from the perspectives of cultural studies. According to the researchers of cultural studies, globalization refers to the disjunctive flows of people, goods, technologies, capitals, images, etc. Following Arjune Appadurai, I explore the five global flows of musical industry. Globalization is a twofold(multifold) process of global domination and dissemination. In other words, global and local are the two faces of the same movement from one epoch of globalization. Therefore, it is not an easy task to map out the complicated web of trajectories and interactions of globalization, nationalism, and localism transpiring around the production and consumption of musical performances. Nevertheless, cultural studies provide us with tools of explanation and interpretation regarding the global fad for musical performances. Especially, I pay attention to Broadway mega-musicals produced by such multinational corporations as Disney. I assert that we need to take the socio-cultural meaning of Disney musical productions because not only do they influence the public consciousness in the realm of American culture but also they affect the life styles of people from other cultures by disseminating the images of American life styles. Adopting the concept of culture as ‘journey’ or ‘flow,’ I try to sketch the seeming global flow of Broadway musical, rethinking the (im)possibility of emergence of global musical culture. I agree with Anthony Smith in that he rejects the possibility of singular global culture. Since cultures and cultural interactions are so complicated, we need to discuss the global flows in terms of cultural dynamics. In this sense, we can explain why our mainstream mega-musicals contain nationalist propensity. Also, we can make meaning of the emergence of little musical movement and the community-based musical theatre in our nation.
참고문헌 (40)
- 고정민, "산업화에 접어든 공연예술" (2003), 삼성경제연구소
- 곽세형, "프랜차이즈 계약 연구", 한국프랜차이즈 경영학, pp.55~75 (2009), 한국프랜차이즈 경영 학회
- 백낙청, "맑시즘, 포스트모더니즘, 민족문화운동", 창작과 비평, (봄), pp.268~300 (1990), 창작과 비평사
- 백낙청, "지구시대 민족문학", 창작과 비평사, (가을), pp.90~121 (1993), 창작과 비평사
- 이승엽, "우리 뮤지컬 시장의 투자자본 in: 연극의 이론과 비평" (2003), 한국예술종합학교 연극과
- 이혜경, "소통을 소통하다-이혜경 연극 평론집" (2008), 연극과 인간
- 장소익, "제2회 <아시아의 울부짖음> 참가기", 민족극과 예술운동, (12), pp.77~96 (1996), 한국민족극운동협회
- 최승연, "1980년대 한국 뮤지컬 공연의 양상 in: 한국공연예술의 새로운 미래" (2006), 연극과 인간
- 최승연, "1990년대 한국 뮤지컬 공연의 양상-주요 흐름을 중심으로", 한국연극학, (29), pp.263~291 (2006), 한국연극학회
- Appadurai, Arjun, "Globalization" (2003), Duke UP
- Appadurai, Arjun, "Disjucture and Difference in Global Cultural Economy in Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity", pp.295~310 (1990), SAGE
- Clifford, James, "Traveling Culture in Cultural Studies", pp.96~116 (1992), Routledge
- Cvetkovich, Ann, "Articulating the Global and the Local" (1997), Westview Press
- Grant, Mark, "The Rise and Fall of Broadway Musical" (2004), Northestern U.P
- Hall, Stuart, "Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices" (1997), SAGE
- Hall, Stuart, "The Local and the Global: Globalization and Ethnicity in Culture, Globalization, and the World-system", pp.19~39 (1997), U of Minnesota Press
- Knapp,Raymond, "The American Musical and the Formation of National Identity" (2005), Princeton UP
- Miller, Scott, "Strike Up the Band: A New History of Musical Theatre" (2007), Heinemann
- Smith, Anthony D, "Towards a Global Culture? in Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity", pp.171~191 (1990), SAGE Publication
- 김석종, "공연계의 ‘미다스의 손’ 신시컴퍼니의 박명성 대표", <경향신문>. 2010. 11. 22., ~ (2010)
- 김선명, "위기 때마다 오뚝이처럼 일어났죠: 설도윤 셀앤컴퍼니 대표", <한국경제매거진>. 2009. 9, ~ (2009)
- 김은진, "8월 한국입성 뮤지컬 <미녀와 야수>", <세계일보>. 2004. 3. 11, ~ (2004)
- 김중식, "브로드웨이 넓히는 디즈니의 힘", <경향신문>. 2004. 3. 10, ~ (2004)
- 김희선, "뮤지컬 <라이온 킹>", <연합뉴스>. 2006. 10. 29., ~ (2006)
- 라제기, "설도윤, 브로드웨이 진출한 첫 프로듀서", <한국일보>. 2006. 4. 14., ~ (2006)
- 이순녀, "베일 벗은 뮤지컬 <아이다>", <서울신문>. 2005. 8.30., ~ (2005)
- 박돈규, "일 대형극단 시키 공연계 잠식할까?", <아트조선>. 2007. 1. 10., ~ (2007)
- 박돈규, "흥행불패 신화 한국에서 깨져", <조선일보>. 2007. 10.27., ~ (2007)
- 박주연, "뮤지컬 성공 방정식 ‘사극의 재구성’", <경향신문>. 2006. 11. 17., ~ (2006)
- 반도헌, "저질공연으로 돈 벌 생각 없다", <시사저널>. 2009. 7.8., ~ (2009)
- 이보연, "종점을 향해 달리는 뮤지컬 <지하철 1호선>", <세계일보>. 2008. 12. 11., ~ (2008)
- 임혜선, "황금알을 낳는 영국 웨스트엔드 파헤치기", <아시아경제>. 2010. 10. 24., ~ (2010)
- 윤정현, "CJ엔터테인먼트 중국 공연 시장 진출", 헤럴드경제, ~ (2010)
- 장만수, "얼쑤 신나는 마당극 속으로", <연합뉴스>. 2007. 7. 20., ~ (2007)
- 씨네 21 취재팀, "소니 ‘핫티켓’ 런칭", <씨네 21>. 2008. 05. 27., ~ (2008)
- "뮤지컬 대부 CJ", <시사저널>. 2007. 10. 29, ~ (2007)
- "브로드웨이 뮤지컬 <타임 앤 어게인> 직접투자", <중앙일보>. 1997. 11. 19., ~ (1997)
- "캣츠 공연 개런티방식 논란", <한겨레>. 1994. 1. 22, ~ (1994)
- Healy, Patrick, "How to Sell a Nanny, a Mermaid, and a Lion", NY Times. April. 19. 2009, ~ (2009)
- Robertson, Campbell, "Disney Wonders if a Mermaid Follow a Trail Blazed by a Lion", NY Times. Dec. 20. 2007, ~ (2007)