본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

쌍대반응표면최적화를 위한 사후선호도반영법: TOPSIS를 활용한 최고선호해 선택

A Posterior Preference Articulation Method to Dual-Response Surface Optimization: Selection of the Most Preferred Solution Using TOPSIS

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Response surface methodology (RSM) is one of popular tools to support a systematic improvement of quality of design in the product and process development stages. It consists of statistical modeling and optimization tools. RSM can be viewed as a knowledge management tool in that it systemizes knowledge about a manufacturing process through a big data analysis on products and processes. The conventional RSM aims to optimize the mean of a response, whereas dual-response surface optimization (DRSO), a special case of RSM, considers not only the mean of a response but also its variability or standard deviation for optimization. Recently, a posterior preference articulation approach receives attention in the DRSO literature. The posterior approach first seeks all (or most) of the nondominated solutions with no articulation of a decision maker (DM)’s preference. The DM then selects the best one from the set of nondominated solutions a posteriori. This method has a strength that the DM can understand the tradeoff between the mean and standard deviation well by looking around the nondominated solutions. A posterior method has been proposed for DRSO. It employs an interval selection strategy for the selection step. This strategy has a limitation increasing inefficiency and complexity due to too many iterations when handling a great number (e.g., thousands ~ tens of thousands) of nondominated solutions. In this paper, a TOPSIS-based method is proposed to support a simple and efficient selection of the most preferred solution. The proposed method is illustrated through a typical DRSO problem and compared with the existing posterior method.

Abstract

Response surface methodology (RSM) is one of popular tools to support a systematic improvement of quality of design in the product and process development stages. It consists of statistical modeling and optimization tools. RSM can be viewed as a knowledge management tool in that it systemizes knowledge about a manufacturing process through a big data analysis on products and processes. The conventional RSM aims to optimize the mean of a response, whereas dual-response surface optimization (DRSO), a special case of RSM, considers not only the mean of a response but also its variability or standard deviation for optimization. Recently, a posterior preference articulation approach receives attention in the DRSO literature. The posterior approach first seeks all (or most) of the nondominated solutions with no articulation of a decision maker (DM)’s preference. The DM then selects the best one from the set of nondominated solutions a posteriori. This method has a strength that the DM can understand the tradeoff between the mean and standard deviation well by looking around the nondominated solutions. A posterior method has been proposed for DRSO. It employs an interval selection strategy for the selection step. This strategy has a limitation increasing inefficiency and complexity due to too many iterations when handling a great number (e.g., thousands ~ tens of thousands) of nondominated solutions. In this paper, a TOPSIS-based method is proposed to support a simple and efficient selection of the most preferred solution. The proposed method is illustrated through a typical DRSO problem and compared with the existing posterior method.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 봉동원, "지식경영시스템 품질 영향 요인 분석: 기술 및 과업 특성 관점에서", 지식경영연구, 8(2), pp.34~55 (2007), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  2. 이순룡, "현대품질경영" (2012), 법문사
  3. 표인수, "QFD를 이용한 기업 법무 서비스 품질 측정 및 개선에 관한 연구", 지식경영연구, 17(2), pp.1~26 (2016), 한국지식경영학회[DOI]
  4. Box, G. E. P., "Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces" (1987), John Wiley & Sons
  5. Haimes, Y. Y., "On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1, pp.296~297 (1971)
  6. Hwang, C. L., "Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems" (1979), Springer-Verlag
  7. Hwang, C. L., "Multiple Attribute Decision Making – Methods and Applications: A State of the Art Survey" (1981), Springer-Verlag
  8. Khuri, A, I., "Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses" (1996), Dekker
  9. Development of a Six-Sigma Improvement Model: Reducing the Variation of Tin Plates’, "Kim, K.", POSCO, ~ (2000)
  10. Lee, D., "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual-Response-Surface Optimization", IIE Transactions, 42, pp.161~171 (2010)
  11. Myers, R. H., "Response Surface Methodology" (2002), John Wiley & Sons
  12. Steuer, R. E., "Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application" (1986), John Wiley & Sons
  13. Vining, G. G., "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach", Journal of Quality Technology, 22, pp.38~45 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)