본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

급성 뇌경색 환자에서 뇌졸중치료실과 일반병동 치료 후 사망률과 의존성의 차이

Differences of Mortality and Dependence Between Stroke Unit and General Ward Care in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신경과학

초록

Background: There is strong evidence for the efficacy of stroke unit (SU) care, which has become a common practice in other developed countries but is available only in a small number of centers in Korea. This late introduction of SU care in Korea can be at least partly attributed to doubts about its benefits on patient outcomes compared to general ward (GW) care in our routine practice. Methods: Based on a prospective stroke registry, we identified 1,300 acute stroke patients hospitalized in either SUs (n=195) or GWs (n=1,105) from January 2004 to June 2008. Clinical outcomes such as fatality and disability rates were compared using propensity score matching in the total cohort. Additional statistical adjustments were performed using stepwise logistic regression analyses with the backward elimination method for potential confounders. Results: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between patients admitted to SUs (n=195) and their matched controls (n=386). The 3-month dependency rate was 17.4% in SUs and 21.0% in GWs (p=0.31), and the case fatality rates were 1.5% and 8.0% (p<0.001), respectively. Adjusted odds ratios for SU care were 0.49 for dependency (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.22-1.08) and 0.17 for death (95% CI=0.04-0.83). Conclusions: This study showed that SU care reduces fatality rates and improves functional outcomes, which indicates the need to implement more SUs in Korea.

Abstract

Background: There is strong evidence for the efficacy of stroke unit (SU) care, which has become a common practice in other developed countries but is available only in a small number of centers in Korea. This late introduction of SU care in Korea can be at least partly attributed to doubts about its benefits on patient outcomes compared to general ward (GW) care in our routine practice. Methods: Based on a prospective stroke registry, we identified 1,300 acute stroke patients hospitalized in either SUs (n=195) or GWs (n=1,105) from January 2004 to June 2008. Clinical outcomes such as fatality and disability rates were compared using propensity score matching in the total cohort. Additional statistical adjustments were performed using stepwise logistic regression analyses with the backward elimination method for potential confounders. Results: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between patients admitted to SUs (n=195) and their matched controls (n=386). The 3-month dependency rate was 17.4% in SUs and 21.0% in GWs (p=0.31), and the case fatality rates were 1.5% and 8.0% (p<0.001), respectively. Adjusted odds ratios for SU care were 0.49 for dependency (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.22-1.08) and 0.17 for death (95% CI=0.04-0.83). Conclusions: This study showed that SU care reduces fatality rates and improves functional outcomes, which indicates the need to implement more SUs in Korea.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Collaborative systemic review of the randomized trials of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care after stroke, "Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration", BMJ, 314, pp.1151~1159 (1997)
  2. The European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee ESO Writing Committee, "Guidelines for Management of Ischaemic Stroke and Transient Ischaemic Attack 2008", Cerebrovasc Dis, 25, pp.457~507 (2008)
  3. Adams HP Jr, "Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists, 2007, pp.38, 1655~1711
  4. Langhorne P, "Association between physiological homeostasis and early recovery after stroke", Stroke, 31, pp.2518~2519 (2000)
  5. Lees KR, "Blood pressure control after acute stroke", J Hypertens Suppl, 14, pp.S35~S38 (1996)
  6. Sulter G, "Continuous pulse oximetry in acute hemiparetic stroke", J Neurol Sci, 179, pp.65~69 (2000)
  7. Sulter G, "From stroke unit care to stroke care unit", J Neurol Sci, 162, pp.1~5 (1999)
  8. Kim SH, "Clinical Usefulness of stroke Unit: The Comparison of in-hospital Treatment Outcomes between Stroke Unit and General Ward Cares", Korean J Stroke, 6, pp.145~150 (2001)
  9. Rosenbaum PR, "The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects", Biometrika, 70, pp.41~55 (1983)
  10. D’Agostino RB Jr, "Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group", Stat Med, 17, pp.2265~2281 (1998)
  11. Adams HP Jr, "Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment", Stroke, 24, pp.35~41 (1993)
  12. Van Swieten JC, "Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients", Stroke, 19, pp.604~607
  13. Kalra L, "Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 356, pp.894~899 (2000)
  14. Seenan P, "units in their natural habitat: Systematic review of observational studies", Stroke, 38, pp.1886~1892 (2007)
  15. 윤두상, "병원기반 코호트에서 급성 허혈성 뇌졸중 및 일과성 뇌허혈 환자의 치명률 및 합병증이 장기 예후에 미치는 영향", 대한신경과학회지, 22(5), pp.433~439 (2004), 대한신경과학회
  16. Bae HJ, "In- hospital medical complications and long-term mortality after ischemic stroke", Stroke, 36, pp.2441~2445 (2005)
  17. Evans A, "Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care?", Lancet, 358, pp.1586~1592 (2001)
  18. Cadilhac D, "Multicenter comparison of processes of care between Stroke Units and conventional care wards in Australia", Stroke, 35, pp.1035~1040 (2004)
  19. Treib J, "Treatment of stroke on an intensive stroke unit: a novel concept", Intensive Care Med, 26, pp.1598~1611 (2000)
  20. Busse O, "Stroke units and stroke services in Germany", Cerebrovasc Dis, 15, pp.8~10 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

선진국의 뇌졸중집중치료서비스 모형과 실제배희준, 이원영대한신경과학회 · 대한신경과학회지2009 · 제27권 제3호국내 뇌졸중전문치료실의 현황 및 문제점: 대한뇌졸중학회 전국 급성기병원 대상 설문조사 결과나정호, 박태환, 박희권, 배희준, 이건세, 이경복, 이병철, 이수주, 정진상, 허지회대한신경과학회 · 대한신경과학회지2015 · 제33권 제3호뇌졸증 집중치료실의 임상적 효용성:뇌졸증 집중치료실과 일반병실에서의 입원 중 치료 비교김서현대한뇌졸중학회 · 대한뇌졸중영문학회지2004 · 제6권 제2호Weekend Admission in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Is Not Associated with Poor Functional Outcome than Weekday Admission강동화, 구자성, 김상철, 김아로, 김지은, 박종무, 박지현, 박희경, 배희준, 오미선, 유경호, 이병철, 이지성, 조용진, 조중양, 한문구, 홍근식, 황선일대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2012 · 제8권 제4호Annual Endovascular Thrombectomy Case Volume and Thrombectomy-capable Hospitals of Korea in Acute Stroke Care황승식, Bae Hee-Joon, Choi Ah Rum, Kang Mi Yeon, Kim Beom Joon, Oh Juhwan, Park Eun Hye, Subramanian S.V., Yang Ki Hwa대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2023 · 제56권 제2호병원기반 코호트에서 급성 허혈성 뇌졸중 및 일과성 뇌허혈 환자의 치명률 및 합병증이 장기 예후에 미치는 영향구자성, 권오현, 김병건, 박종무, 배희준, 윤두상, 이수주대한신경과학회 · 대한신경과학회지2004 · 제22권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)