본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

수행능력 기반 사용자 평가를 활용한 노인용 고혈압치료제 안전사용설명서 개발

Developing a Drug Information Leaflet of Antihypertensives for Senior Citizens; Employing Performance-based User-testing

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류약학

초록

Objective: Written information could be helpful for senior population to adhere to complex medication therapies, but must be well prepared and empirically assessed to achieve such end. We purposed to develop a drug information leaflet for senior citizens by applying 'performance-based user-testing.' Methods: We employed a user-testing, a mixed method to figure difficulties out with patients' leaflets from the user perspective. The cycle made of test and revision can be repeated as necessary. We recruited senior citizens with age of 65 or above who were taking antihypertensive medications at the point of participating and excluded the elderly who suffered illiteracy. We firstly rectified a drug information leaflet of antihypertensive medications for the general public distributed by the Korean authority based on focus group interviews (9 participants). The revised leaflets were tested four times with 8~12 participants in each round (40 seniors in total). We targeted to develop a leaflet which more than 80% of participants understood 10 key information. Main outcomes measures were to be able to find information and be able to understand information. This study was approved by the Yeungnam University Research Ethics Committee. Results: Focus group interviews identifieddifficulties with small font of words, professional language, long information, and a poor structure. The leaflet was revised and in the first round questionnaire found problems with 4/10 information points; interviews disclosed all but one (normal blood pressure range) were ill-understood. The second round questionnaire and interview found fewer problems but the comprehensiveness of participants was still poor in several points. For the third and fourth rounds we revised the leaflets in the individual-targeted manner. Finally, the fourth round showed all key information found and understood by at least 80% of participants except one question about drug name. Conclusion: The drug leaflets need to be developed in a personalized mode for the seniors. There was a limit for Korean seniors to understand nonproprietary name of their drugs because they used to producers' trade names which the Korean health system predominantly works with.

Abstract

Objective: Written information could be helpful for senior population to adhere to complex medication therapies, but must be well prepared and empirically assessed to achieve such end. We purposed to develop a drug information leaflet for senior citizens by applying 'performance-based user-testing.' Methods: We employed a user-testing, a mixed method to figure difficulties out with patients' leaflets from the user perspective. The cycle made of test and revision can be repeated as necessary. We recruited senior citizens with age of 65 or above who were taking antihypertensive medications at the point of participating and excluded the elderly who suffered illiteracy. We firstly rectified a drug information leaflet of antihypertensive medications for the general public distributed by the Korean authority based on focus group interviews (9 participants). The revised leaflets were tested four times with 8~12 participants in each round (40 seniors in total). We targeted to develop a leaflet which more than 80% of participants understood 10 key information. Main outcomes measures were to be able to find information and be able to understand information. This study was approved by the Yeungnam University Research Ethics Committee. Results: Focus group interviews identifieddifficulties with small font of words, professional language, long information, and a poor structure. The leaflet was revised and in the first round questionnaire found problems with 4/10 information points; interviews disclosed all but one (normal blood pressure range) were ill-understood. The second round questionnaire and interview found fewer problems but the comprehensiveness of participants was still poor in several points. For the third and fourth rounds we revised the leaflets in the individual-targeted manner. Finally, the fourth round showed all key information found and understood by at least 80% of participants except one question about drug name. Conclusion: The drug leaflets need to be developed in a personalized mode for the seniors. There was a limit for Korean seniors to understand nonproprietary name of their drugs because they used to producers' trade names which the Korean health system predominantly works with.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Lee JY, "Current status of education in the safety use of drugs and introduction of model cases", J Pharm Policy Res, 7(2), pp.32~41 (2013)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, "White paper for health and welfare 2014", pp.29~ (2015), Ministry of Health & Welfare
  3. Bates DW, "The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group", JAMA, 277(4), pp.307~311 (1997)
  4. Kasbekar R, "The pharmacist's role in preventing medication errors in older adults", Consult Pharm, 29(12), pp.838~842 (2014)
  5. Britten N, "Medicines in the lifeworld. Medicines and society: Patients, professionals and the dominance of pharmaceuticals", pp.45~63 (2008), Palgrave MacMillan
  6. Grissinger MC, "The role of managed care pharmacy in reducing medication errors", J Manag Care Pharm, 9(1), pp.62~65 (2003)
  7. Classen DC, "Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality", JAMA, 277(4), pp.301~306 (1997)
  8. Gandhi TK, "Adverse drug events in ambulatory care", N Engl J Med, 348(16), pp.1556~1564 (2003)
  9. Feste C, "Empowerment: from philosophy to practice", Patient Educ Couns, 26(1-3), pp.139~144 (1995)
  10. Anderson RM, "Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial", Diabetes Care, 18(7), pp.943~949 (1995)
  11. Samoocha D, "Effectiveness of web-based interventions on patient empowerment: a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Med Internet Res, 12(2), pp.e23~ (2010)
  12. Zarcadoolas C, "Defining health literacy. Advancing health literacy: A framework for understanding and action", pp.45~67 (2006), Whiley
  13. Hall J, "Effectiveness of interventions designed to promote patient involvement to enhance safety: a systematic review", Insight, 35(2), pp.18~ (2010)
  14. 손미경, "노인 인구에 있어 환자용 의약품 안전사용 설명서의 활용성 평가", 한국임상약학회지, 26(1), pp.6~12 (2016), 한국임상약학회
  15. Raynor DK, "“User-testing” as a method for testing the fitness-for-purpose of written medicine information", Patient Educ Couns, 83(3), pp.404~410 (2011)
  16. Guest G, "How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability", Field Methods, 18(1), pp.59~82 (2006)
  17. 김경아, "환자용 설명서와 전문가용 설명서에 대한 이해도 비교 분석", 석사, 임상약학, pp.2007
  18. 남수정, "의약품 표시와 소비자능력", 소비문화연구, 13(1), pp.21~37 (2010), 한국소비문화학회
  19. Han H-S, "Sources of drug information for self-medication patients", M.S., pp.2000
  20. 김영선, "노인의 건강정보이해능력(Health Literacy)에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석 : 앤더슨 행동모형 적용", 노인복지연구, (65), pp.35~57 (2014), 한국노인복지학회
  21. 이인향, "일반의약품 설명서의 이해도와 적정 사용가능성 평가", 약 학 회 지, 56(5), pp.333~345 (2012), 대한약학회
  22. National survey in basic literacy of Korean, "National Institute of Korean Language", National Institute of Korean Language, 81~82 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)