Nicotine Dependence Evaluated by Urinary Cotinine and Heaviness of Smoking Index among Smokers, Vapers, and Dual Users: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data
2
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Many people use both combustible cigarette (CC) and electronic cigarette (EC). We compared nicotine dependence among CC, EC, and dual users using questionnaires and urinary cotinine levels. Methods: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014–2017) databases were analyzed; 3,917 CC, EC, and dual users were administered the urinary cotinine test, and 1,045 current CC and dual users completed the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) questionnaires. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine levels were compared between exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users. The distribution rate, based on time to first cigarette (TTFC), cigarettes per day (CPD), and the HSI was analyzed in two weighted groups, exclusive CC and dual users. Results: Among those who currently use any type of cigarette, 89.4%, 1.4%, and 9.2% were exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users, respectively. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine were highest in dual users (1,356.4 ng/mL), followed by exclusive CC (1,270.3 ng/mL), and exclusive EC (867.7 ng/mL) with significant differences between all three groups (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CPD between exclusive CC and dual users (P=0.626). The proportion of TTFC ≤5 minutes was 21.5% and 29.5% in the two groups, respectively (P=0.010); however, HSI differences in the two groups was marginal (P=0.557). Conclusion: In this study, the urinary cotinine value could distinguish the three groups, CC, EC, and dual users, but the questionnaire using HSI could not distinguish the three groups.
Abstract
Background: Many people use both combustible cigarette (CC) and electronic cigarette (EC). We compared nicotine dependence among CC, EC, and dual users using questionnaires and urinary cotinine levels. Methods: Data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014–2017) databases were analyzed; 3,917 CC, EC, and dual users were administered the urinary cotinine test, and 1,045 current CC and dual users completed the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) questionnaires. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine levels were compared between exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users. The distribution rate, based on time to first cigarette (TTFC), cigarettes per day (CPD), and the HSI was analyzed in two weighted groups, exclusive CC and dual users. Results: Among those who currently use any type of cigarette, 89.4%, 1.4%, and 9.2% were exclusive CC, exclusive EC, and dual users, respectively. Weighted geometric means of urine cotinine were highest in dual users (1,356.4 ng/mL), followed by exclusive CC (1,270.3 ng/mL), and exclusive EC (867.7 ng/mL) with significant differences between all three groups (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in CPD between exclusive CC and dual users (P=0.626). The proportion of TTFC ≤5 minutes was 21.5% and 29.5% in the two groups, respectively (P=0.010); however, HSI differences in the two groups was marginal (P=0.557). Conclusion: In this study, the urinary cotinine value could distinguish the three groups, CC, EC, and dual users, but the questionnaire using HSI could not distinguish the three groups.
참고문헌 (23)
- Gravely S, "Use of electronic cigarettes across 13 ITC countries with different regulatory environments", Tob Induc Dis, 16(Suppl 1), pp.A229~ (2018)
- "Public health consequences of E-cigarettes" (2018)[URL]
- "Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey" (2016)[URL]
- "Current use status of electronic cigarettes in Korea" (2018)[URL]
- Patel D, "Reasons for current E-cigarette use among U.S. adults", Prev Med, 93, pp.14~20 (2016)
- Park MB, "Differences between the effects of conventional cigarettes, e-cigarettes and dual product use on urine cotinine levels", Tob Induc Dis, 17, pp.12~ (2019)
- Rhoades DA, "Dual versus never use of e-cigarettes among American Indians who smoke", Am J Prev Med, 57, pp.e59~68e (2019)
- Sung HY, "Polytobacco use and nicotine dependence symptoms among US adults, 2012-2014", Nicotine Tob Res, 20(suppl_1), pp.S88~S98 (2018)
- Perez-Rios M, "Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence vs heavy smoking index in a general population survey", BMC Public Health, 9, pp.493~ (2009)
- Man CN, "Simple, rapid and sensitive assay method for simultaneous quantification of urinary nicotine and cotinine using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry", J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 844, pp.322~327 (2006)
- Kuo HW, "Determination of urinary and salivary cotinine using gas and liquid chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay", J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 768, pp.297~303 (2002)
- Jung HS, "Can urinary cotinine predict nicotine dependence level in smokers?", Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, pp.5483~5488 (2012)
- Kweon S, "Data resource profile : the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES)", Int J Epidemiol, 43, pp.69~77 (2014)
- Prochaska JO, "Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers", Addict Behav, 10, pp.395~406 (1985)
- "The 6th Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2015) clinical laboratory analysis institutions and methods" (2015)[URL]
- "Heaviness of Smoking Index" (2016)[URL]
- "7th National Health and Nutrition Survey 1st and 2nd report: usage guidelines for using raw data" (2017)[URL]
- Martinez U, "How does smoking and nicotine dependence change after onset of vaping? : a retrospective analysis of dual users", Nicotine Tob Res, 22, pp.764~770 (2020)
- Morean M, "Comparing cigarette and ecigarette dependence and predicting frequency of smoking and e-cigarette use in dual-users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes", Addict Behav, 87, pp.92~96 (2018)
- Vogel EA, "Measuring e-cigarette addiction among adolescents", Tob Control, 29, pp.258~262 (2020)
- Liu G, "A comparison of nicotine dependence among exclusive E-cigarette and cigarette users in the PATH study", Prev Med, 104, pp.86~91 (2017)
- Foulds J, "Development of a questionnaire for assessing dependence on electronic cigarettes among a large sample of ex-smoking E-cigarette users", Nicotine Tob Res, 17, pp.186~192 (2015)
- Jankowski M, "E-cigarettes are more addictive than traditional cigarettes : a study in highly educated young people", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16, pp.2279~ (2019)