Differences in Blood Pressure Measurements Obtained Using an Automatic Oscillometric Sphygmomanometer Depending on Clothes-Wearing Status
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: According to the current guidelines for blood pressure monitoring, clinicians are recommended to measure blood pressure by completely exposing the upper arm. However, it is a common practice that blood pressure is measured with the cuff placed over the sleeve or with the sleeve rolled up. We therefore conducted this study to examine whether there are any differences in blood pressure measurements among the three different settings: the sleeve group, the rolled sleeve group, and the bare arm group. Methods: We conducted the current study in 141 male and female adult patients who visited our clinical department. In these patients, we took repeatedly blood pressure measurements using the same automatic oscillometric device on three different settings. Then, we analyzed the results with the use of randomized block design analysis of variance. Results: The mean values of systolic blood pressure (SBP) between the first reading and those of the second reading were 128.5 ± 10.6 mm Hg in the sleeve group, 128.3 ± 10.8 mm Hg in the rolled sleeve group, and 128.3 ± 10.7 mm Hg in the bare arm group. These results indicate that there were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.32). In addition, the mean values of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the first reading and those of the second reading were 80.7 ± 6.1 mm Hg in the sleeve group, 80.7 ± 6.1 mm Hg in the rolled sleeve group, and 80.6 ± 5.9 mm Hg in the bare arm group. These results indicate that there were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.77). In addition,based on the age, sex, past or current history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus, the thickness of sleeve, weight, a drinking history, and a smoking history, there were no significant differences in SBP and DBP among the three groups. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in blood pressure measurements between the three different settings (the sleeve group, the rolled sleeve group, and the bare arm group).
Abstract
Background: According to the current guidelines for blood pressure monitoring, clinicians are recommended to measure blood pressure by completely exposing the upper arm. However, it is a common practice that blood pressure is measured with the cuff placed over the sleeve or with the sleeve rolled up. We therefore conducted this study to examine whether there are any differences in blood pressure measurements among the three different settings: the sleeve group, the rolled sleeve group, and the bare arm group. Methods: We conducted the current study in 141 male and female adult patients who visited our clinical department. In these patients, we took repeatedly blood pressure measurements using the same automatic oscillometric device on three different settings. Then, we analyzed the results with the use of randomized block design analysis of variance. Results: The mean values of systolic blood pressure (SBP) between the first reading and those of the second reading were 128.5 ± 10.6 mm Hg in the sleeve group, 128.3 ± 10.8 mm Hg in the rolled sleeve group, and 128.3 ± 10.7 mm Hg in the bare arm group. These results indicate that there were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.32). In addition, the mean values of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between the first reading and those of the second reading were 80.7 ± 6.1 mm Hg in the sleeve group, 80.7 ± 6.1 mm Hg in the rolled sleeve group, and 80.6 ± 5.9 mm Hg in the bare arm group. These results indicate that there were no significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.77). In addition,based on the age, sex, past or current history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus, the thickness of sleeve, weight, a drinking history, and a smoking history, there were no significant differences in SBP and DBP among the three groups. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in blood pressure measurements between the three different settings (the sleeve group, the rolled sleeve group, and the bare arm group).
참고문헌 (19)
- (2009)[URL]
- (2007)[URL]
- Pickering TG, "Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research", Circulation, 111, pp.697~716 (2005)
- Quinn RR, "The 2010 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: part I - blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk", Can J Cardiol, 26, pp.241~248 (2010)
- Frese EM, "Blood pressure measurement guidelines for physical therapists", Cardiopulm Phys Ther J, 22, pp.5~12 (2011)
- O’Brien E, "European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement", J Hypertens, 21, pp.821~848 (2003)
- Williams B, "British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary", BMJ, 328, pp.634~640 (2004)
- Holleman DR Jr, "The effect of sleeved arms on oscillometric blood pressure measurement", J Gen Intern Med, 8, pp.325~326 (1993)
- Lee KJ, "Evaluation of correlation between automatic ocillometric sphygmomanometer and standard Korotkoff auscultatory sphygmomanometer", Korean Circ J, 27, pp.501~507 (1997)
- Braam RL, "Home blood pressure measurement with oscillometric upper-arm devices", Neth J Med, 61, pp.307~312 (2003)
- Lee SW, "Accuracy of the sphygmomanometer for measuring of blood pressure", J Korean Acad Fam Med, 18, pp.1500~1507 (1997)
- Kahan E, "Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, below a rolled-up sleeve, or over a sleeve", Fam Pract, 20, pp.730~732 (2003)
- Liebl M, "The effect of clothes on sphygmomanometric and oscillometric blood pressure measurement", Blood Press, 13, pp.279~282 (2004)
- Ma G, "A comparison of blood pressure measurement over a sleeved arm versus a bare arm", CMAJ, 178, pp.585~589 (2008)
- Linfors EW, "Spurious hypertension in the obese patient: effect of sphygmomanometer cuff size on prevalence of hypertension", Arch Intern Med, 14, pp.1482~1485 (1984)
- Bovet P, "Systematic difference between blood pressure readings caused by cuff type", Hypertension, 24, pp.786~792 (1994)
- King GE, "Errors in clinical measurement of blood pressure in obesity", Clin Sci, 32, pp.223~237 (1967)
- Arcuri EA, "Is early diagnosis of hypertension a function of cuff width?", J Hypertens Suppl, 7, pp.S60~S61 (1989)
- Russell AE, "Optimal size of cuff bladder for indirect measurement of arterial pressure in adults", J Hypertens, 7, pp.607~613 (1989)