민사소송법상 과학적 증거

키워드

참고문헌 (42)

1. "신민사소송법" (2006), 박영사
2. "Pushing the Limits of Scientific Reliability-The Questionable Wisdom of Abandoning the Peer Review Standard for Admitting Expert Testimony", pp.47~ (1994)
3. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 41" (1993)
4. "Say Good-Bye to the Frye", pp.113 454~
5. "Redefining the Bases for Admissibility of Expert Scientific Testimony", Inc
6. "Navigating Expert Reliability: Are Criminal Standards of Certainty Being Left on the Dock?", 64, pp.99~ (2000)
7. "Junk Science in the United States and the Commonwealth", 21, pp.123~ (1996)
8. "Frye, Frye, Again: The Past, Present, and Future of the General Acceptance Test", 41, pp.385~ (2001)
9. "Mapping the Labyrinth of Scientific Evidence", 46, pp.555~556 (1995)
10. "Confronting the New Challenges of Scientific Evidence", 108, pp.1481~ (1995)
11. "The Alliance of Science and Law in Criminal Justice in Crisis 233" (1994)
12. "Expert Evidence in the Republic of Korea and Under the U Federal Rules of Evidence: A Comparative Study", 19, pp.585~ (1997)
13. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 185" (1993)
14. "And the Practice of Law"
15. "in Handbook of PsyExpert Evidencechology in Legal Contexts 557", pp.557~ (1995)
16. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 155" (1993)
17. "The Trial of the Expert A Study of Forensic Evidence And Forensic Experts 151-67" (1987)
18. "Admissibility of Scientific Evidence in Courts", 24, pp.243~ (2005)
19. "Have we a Lesson to Learn from the French?" (1992), in Current Legal Problems 213
20. "Scientific Evidence in Complex Litigation Civil Practice and Effective Litigation Techniques in Federal and State Courts 709" (1991)
21. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 123" (1993)
22. "Inconsistency in Evidentiary Standards for Medial Testimony Disorder in the Courts", 288, pp.1382~1382 (2002)
23. "Inconsistency in Evidentiary Standards for Medial Testimony Disorder in the Courts", 288, pp.1382~1383 (2002)
24. "Judicial Use of Social Science Research after Daubert", 2, pp.327~ (1994)
25. "Judicial", Technical Assessment of Novel Scientific Evidence, 1990, ~
26. "It’s Not Bad Law - It’s Bad Science: Problems with Expert Testimony in Trial Proceedings", 18, pp.545~ (1995)
27. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 317", pp.331~32 (1993)
28. "Changes in the Standards of Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases Since the Daubert Decision xiii" (2002)
29. "The Epistemological Role of Expert Witnesses and Toxic Torts", 38, pp.1~ (1998)
30. "The Perspectival Nature of Expert Testimony in the United States, England, Korea, and France", 18, pp.55~ (2002)
31. "From Barefoot to Daubert to Joiner Triple Play or Double Error?", 40, pp.753~ (1998)
32. "Testing the Assumptions Underlying the Debate About Scientific Evidence A Closer Look at Juror" (1993), Incompetence
33. "Daubert Revisited", 41(3), pp.5~ (2005)
34. "The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence", pp.80~ (1980)
35. "Science in the Criminal Process 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 469" (1994)
36. "DNA Profiling and the Use of Expert Scientific Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings, in Criminal Justice in Europe", pp.267~ (1995)
37. "A Practical Approach to Evidence 302" (1980)
38. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 223", pp.250~51 (1993)
39. "A Comparative Study of Expert Testimony in France and the United States: Philosophical Underpinnings, History Practice and Procedure", 31, pp.181~ (1996)
40. "A New Day for DNA?" (1992)
41. "Lord Taylor Urges Caution In Use of Expert Witnesses available at 1994 WL 11361285", (v), pp.~10 (1994)
42. "in Criminal Procedure Systems in the European Community 68-69" (1993)

관련 논문AI추천