본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중국 불법행위법의 최근동향에 관한 연구 - 불법행위책임법(2009년)의 구성과 주요내용을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Tort Liability Act of the People's Republic of China(2009)

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The purpose of this study is to survey the Tort Liability Act, passed on december 26, 2009, will take effect on July 1, 2010(hereafter, the Tort Act). China has made the Civil Code since 2002, which is not completed but is developing step by step, followed by the Contract Act(1999) and the Real Rights Act(2007). The Tort Liability Act is one of the most important law field of the Civil Code of China, because the Tort law protects the private rights and interests. The Tort Act is mainly based on existing provisions, such as the general Principles of the Civil Law, the Act on Protection of Consumenr Rights, the Product Quality Law, etc and some judicial interpretations of the supreme court. Especially, it affirms, modifies and elaborates the he general Principles of the Civil Law(1986). Before its proclamation, there were two official drafts, the first in 2002, and the second in 2008, which are mainly the some with the Tort law, and several private drafts. The Tort Act contains 12 chapters with 92 provisions,as follows : General provisions(chapter 1)ㆍConstituting liability and methods of assuming liability(ch. 2)ㆍCircumstances to waive and mitigate liability(ch. 3)ㆍSpecial provisions on tortfeasors(ch. 4)ㆍProduct liabilityㆍ(ch. 5)ㆍLiability for motor vehicle traffic accident(ch. 6)ㆍLiability for medical malpractice(ch. 7)ㆍLiability for environmental pollution(ch. 8)ㆍLiability for ultra-hazardous activity(ch. 9)ㆍLiability for harm caused by domestic animal(ch. 10)ㆍLiability for harm caused by object(ch. 11)ㆍSupplementary provision(ch. 12). Compared to the Korean Civil Code,which under the part of obligations(part III), provides, concurrently, a contract and a tort, the Tort Act has no part of obligations, but has only the contract act and the tort act. According to the Tort Act, one who is at fault for infringement upon a civil right of another person shall be subject to the tort liability(article 2). It also covers infringements of personal rights, such as name, reputation, portrait, privacy and etc. The principle of tort liability on the basis of general provisions, is universally accepted. The default rule of the liability is the fault liability and in exception of the presumption of fault and no-fault liability without fault(articles 6and 7). The tort act contains, in its general part, criteria for liability, compensation for damages, defenses and mental damages, as well as in its specific part, product liability, motor vehicle accident liability, internet service provider liability, medical malpractice, environmental pollution liability, liability for ultra-hazardous activity and liability for damage caused by animals or by objects. It has also special provisions such as liability of persons with diminished capacity, joint and several liability of the joint tortfeasors. Introducing punitive damages is also one of its key features. All these are the result of the unification of related provisions which are currently found in many fields. Its new and revolutionary approach and contents will be very suggestive for us preparing the reform of our code civil since 2009,although it seems to have a some lack of harmony in it.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to survey the Tort Liability Act, passed on december 26, 2009, will take effect on July 1, 2010(hereafter, the Tort Act). China has made the Civil Code since 2002, which is not completed but is developing step by step, followed by the Contract Act(1999) and the Real Rights Act(2007). The Tort Liability Act is one of the most important law field of the Civil Code of China, because the Tort law protects the private rights and interests. The Tort Act is mainly based on existing provisions, such as the general Principles of the Civil Law, the Act on Protection of Consumenr Rights, the Product Quality Law, etc and some judicial interpretations of the supreme court. Especially, it affirms, modifies and elaborates the he general Principles of the Civil Law(1986). Before its proclamation, there were two official drafts, the first in 2002, and the second in 2008, which are mainly the some with the Tort law, and several private drafts. The Tort Act contains 12 chapters with 92 provisions,as follows : General provisions(chapter 1)ㆍConstituting liability and methods of assuming liability(ch. 2)ㆍCircumstances to waive and mitigate liability(ch. 3)ㆍSpecial provisions on tortfeasors(ch. 4)ㆍProduct liabilityㆍ(ch. 5)ㆍLiability for motor vehicle traffic accident(ch. 6)ㆍLiability for medical malpractice(ch. 7)ㆍLiability for environmental pollution(ch. 8)ㆍLiability for ultra-hazardous activity(ch. 9)ㆍLiability for harm caused by domestic animal(ch. 10)ㆍLiability for harm caused by object(ch. 11)ㆍSupplementary provision(ch. 12). Compared to the Korean Civil Code,which under the part of obligations(part III), provides, concurrently, a contract and a tort, the Tort Act has no part of obligations, but has only the contract act and the tort act. According to the Tort Act, one who is at fault for infringement upon a civil right of another person shall be subject to the tort liability(article 2). It also covers infringements of personal rights, such as name, reputation, portrait, privacy and etc. The principle of tort liability on the basis of general provisions, is universally accepted. The default rule of the liability is the fault liability and in exception of the presumption of fault and no-fault liability without fault(articles 6and 7). The tort act contains, in its general part, criteria for liability, compensation for damages, defenses and mental damages, as well as in its specific part, product liability, motor vehicle accident liability, internet service provider liability, medical malpractice, environmental pollution liability, liability for ultra-hazardous activity and liability for damage caused by animals or by objects. It has also special provisions such as liability of persons with diminished capacity, joint and several liability of the joint tortfeasors. Introducing punitive damages is also one of its key features. All these are the result of the unification of related provisions which are currently found in many fields. Its new and revolutionary approach and contents will be very suggestive for us preparing the reform of our code civil since 2009,although it seems to have a some lack of harmony in it.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 김성수, "중화인민공화국 민법전의 불법행위책임법(초안)에 관한 연구(1)(2)", 사법행정, 48(10), pp.10~11 (2007)
  2. 김성수, "중화인민공화국의 불법행위책임법(2009년)에 대한 연구-불법행위법의 주요내용과 우리 법의 시사점을 중심으로", 한국비교사법학회 제63회 정기(동계)학술대회 발표문 (2010)
  3. 김성수, "중화인민공화국 불법행위책임법(2009년)에 대한 기초적 연구(1)-(2), - 조문내용을 중심으로", 사법행정, 51(4), pp.4~5 (2010)
  4. 이상욱, "중국 불법행위법 제정의 현황과 전망", 법학논총, 22, pp.165~186 (2009), 법학연구소
  5. 양립신, "중국 침권책임법의 대ㆍ소 일반 침권책임조항의 조합", 경희법학, 45(1), pp.433~447 (2010), 법학연구소
  6. 王利明, "中国民法典基本理论问题研究" (2004), 人民法院出版社
  7. 王利明, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法释义" (2010), 中国法制出版社
  8. 王利明, "中华民法典草案建议稿及说明" (2004), 中国法制出版社
  9. 王利明, "中国民法典学者建议稿及立法理由" (2005), 法律出版社
  10. 王利明, "人身损害赔偿疑难问题" (2004), 中国社会科学出版社
  11. 梁慧星, "中华民法典草案建议稿附理由", 法律出版社 (2004)
  12. 杨立新, "《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》精解" (2010), 知识产权出版社
  13. 杨立新, "《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文释解与司法适用" (2010), 人民法院出版社
  14. 杨立新, "侵权责任法" (2010), 法律出版社
  15. 杨立新, "侵权行为法" (2006), 中国法制出版社
  16. 杨立新, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法草案建议稿及说明" (2007), 法律出版社
  17. 杨立新, "类型侵权行为研究" (2006), 人民法院出版社
  18. 张新宝, "中国侵权行为法" (1995), 中国社会科学出版社
  19. 张新宝, "侵权行为法" (2006), 中国人民大学出版社
  20. 王胜明, "《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文解释与立法背景" (2010), 人民法院出版社
  21. 奚晓明, "《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》条文理解与适用" (2010), 人民法院出版社
  22. 吴高盛, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法精解" (2010), 政法大学出版社
  23. 人大常委会民法室, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法解读" (2010), 中国法制出版社
  24. 中国法制出版社, "侵权责任法实用问答:含相关条文对照与赔偿计算标准" (2010), 中国法制出版社
  25. 本书编写组, "《侵权责任法》100问" (2010), 法律出版社
  26. 高圣平, "《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》立法争点ㆍ立法例及经典案例" (2010), 北京大学出版社
  27. 法律出版社法规中心, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法问答" (2010), 法律出版社
  28. 王利明等, "中国侵权责任法教程" (2010), 人民法院出版社
  29. 麻昌华, "侵权行为法地位研究" (2004), 中国政法大学出版社
  30. 徐国栋, "綠色民法典草案" (2004), 社会科学文献出版社
  31. 梅夏英, "中华人民共和国侵权责任法讲座" (2010), 中国法制出版社
  32. 王竹, "侵权责任法应用指南" (2010), 法律出版社
  33. 侯国跃, "中国侵权法立法建议稿及理由" (2009), 法律出版社
  34. 布吕格迈耶尔, "中国侵权责任法,学者建议稿及其立法理由" (2009), 北京大学出版社
  35. 崔素琴 等, "损害赔偿法实施中的疑难问题" (2009), 中国公安大学出版社
  36. 车辉, "侵权责任法理论与实务" (2009), 中国政法大学出版社
  37. 謝哲學, "中國民法" (2007), 新學林
  38. 郭明瑞 等, "侵权行为法" (2006), 科学出版社
  39. 高富平, , 民法法律出版社, ~ (2005)
  40. 闵敢, "民法" (2005), 中国政法大学出版社
  41. 徐国栋, "民法典草案의 基本结构-以民法的调整物件理论为中心", 法学研究, 1 (2000)
  42. "杨立新, 从《民法通则》到《侵权责任法》, 国际商报 2009년 12월 8일자 12면", ~ (2009)
  43. "中国大陆侵权责任立法, 中国大陆侵权责任立法, 第二届海峡两岸法学学术研讨会发言稿09年10月27日)"[URL]
  44. "侵权责任法立法专题"[URL]
  45. "全国人大无权通过《侵权责任法》"[URL]
  46. "《侵权责任法》的出身是否合法?"[URL]
  47. "侵权责任法(第三次审议稿)的评析与修改建议"[URL]
  48. "《侵权责任法》的六大不足"[URL]
  49. "中国社会科学院法学研究所, 侵权行为立法研究课题组(李昊ㆍ于敏 等)", ~ (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)