농지의 사용⋅수익에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - 임대차를 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Farmland Lease
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article focuses on comparing the Legal system of the Farmland Lease among the three countries(Japan, Germany, and France). Japan has the civil law as general law, while it has the japanese farmland act as special law in field of farmland transactions. Germany has the BGB and the german Landpachtverkehrsgesetz (LPachtVG). France has the Code civil and the Code rural. Thus each country has its own legal system protecting the farmland lessee. There are several development patterns regarding the legal system of the farmland lease. In the first stage, principle of freedom of contract has ruled through the civil law. And then each country has established the special laws regarding the protection of the farmland lessee at the time of the second World War. Today each country has been trying to accomplish the harmony between the lessor and the lessee. There are some phenomena of restriction on the farmland lease. Japan has the executive permission under the farmland act. Germany has the farmland lease reporting system. And then France has the similar permission system(e.g. préfet;superficie minimum d'Installation: SMI). This article also addresses the main legal points for example, duration of lease, management of rent, opposing power of the lessee, and the dispute settlement system. This study might be able to approximate some solutions to the problems of the korean farmland lease. Korean Farmland Act 1996 provided the concrete rules concerning the protection of the farmland lessee. But those rules has disappeared through the several reforms, and thus there are some gaps between the law and the real transactions. This comparative study can make up the fault of the korean farmland legal system.
Abstract
This article focuses on comparing the Legal system of the Farmland Lease among the three countries(Japan, Germany, and France). Japan has the civil law as general law, while it has the japanese farmland act as special law in field of farmland transactions. Germany has the BGB and the german Landpachtverkehrsgesetz (LPachtVG). France has the Code civil and the Code rural. Thus each country has its own legal system protecting the farmland lessee. There are several development patterns regarding the legal system of the farmland lease. In the first stage, principle of freedom of contract has ruled through the civil law. And then each country has established the special laws regarding the protection of the farmland lessee at the time of the second World War. Today each country has been trying to accomplish the harmony between the lessor and the lessee. There are some phenomena of restriction on the farmland lease. Japan has the executive permission under the farmland act. Germany has the farmland lease reporting system. And then France has the similar permission system(e.g. préfet;superficie minimum d'Installation: SMI). This article also addresses the main legal points for example, duration of lease, management of rent, opposing power of the lessee, and the dispute settlement system. This study might be able to approximate some solutions to the problems of the korean farmland lease. Korean Farmland Act 1996 provided the concrete rules concerning the protection of the farmland lessee. But those rules has disappeared through the several reforms, and thus there are some gaps between the law and the real transactions. This comparative study can make up the fault of the korean farmland legal system.
참고문헌 (46)
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅵ)" (2007), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "民法注解(ⅩⅤ)" (2007), 博英社
- 郭潤直, "債權各論(民法講義Ⅳ), 重版" (2009), 博英社
- 金相容, "土地法, 增補版" (2004), 法元社
- 明淳龜, "프랑스민법전 Code Civil Français" (2004), 법문사
- 朴駿緖, "註釋民法 債權各則(2)" (1999), 韓國司法行政學會
- 사동천, "농업법강의" (2007), 홍익대학교 출판부
- 梁彰洙,독일민법전-총칙,채권, "독일민법전-총칙, 채권, 물권" (2008), 박영사
- 尹喆洪, "所有權의 歷史" (1995), 法元社
- 農業法令整備에 관한 硏究, "韓國農業法學會", 농림부, ~ (2001)
- 黃迪仁, "經濟法叢書Ⅴ 農業法" (1999), 三知院
- 김수석, "독일의 농지임대차제 연구-농지임대차법을 중심으로", 농업경제연구, 37 (1996)
- 朴英昊, "農地賃貸借에 關한 法的 考察", 석사, pp.1989
- 송재일, "농지거래에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 윤석환, "농지선매협의제도 도입방안", 농업경제동향 (2004), 농업기반공사
- 尹喆洪, "프랑스革命과 民法의 發展", 法史學硏究, (10) (1989)
- 농림수산부, "농지법 해설 및 문답", ~ (1996)
- 韓國農村經濟硏究院, "農地法制定白書" (1995)
- 韓國農村經濟硏究院, "農地賃貸借管理法白書" (1987)
- 國會 圖書館資料局, "歐洲主要國의 土地法制(海外資料 第75號)", ~ (1983)
- 민의원 법제사법위원회 민법안심의소위원회, "민법안심의록(하권)", ~ (1957)
- 한국법제연구원, "농지규제법제에 대한 입법평가 워크숍", ~ (2009)
- 稲本洋之助, "日本の土地法 : 歴史と現状" (2004), 成文堂
- 遠藤浩, "注解不動産法" (1993), 青林書院
- 加藤一郞, "農業法, In 法律學全集 50" (1985), 有斐閣
- 土屋生, "農業法學(1)" (1985), 中央大學出版部
- 中川善之助, "不動産法大系" (1971), 靑林書院新社
- 仁甁五郞, "轉用のための農地賣買․賃貸借" (2009), 學陽書房
- 農林水産省構造改善局, "逐條對照 農地關係法" (1996), 學陽書房
- Barabé-Bouchard Véronique et Hérail Marc, "Droit rural" (2007), Ellipses
- Christian Grimm, "Agrarrecht" (1995), Verlag C.H.Beck
- Christina Dupeyron, "Jean Theron et Jean-Jacques Barbieri, Droit agraire, 1er volume" (1994), Economica
- Christina Dupeyron, "Jean Theron et Jean-Jacques Barbieri, Droit de l'exploitation, 2e éd" (1994), Economica
- Fritz Baur, "Sachenrecht, C.H. Beck, 18. Auflage" (2009)
- George Turner, "Agrarrecht : Ein Grundriß, 2. Auflage" (1998), Ulmer
- Grimm, "Agrarrecht, 2. Auflage" (2004), C.H. Beck
- Jacques Audier, "Droit rural" (2009), Dalloz-Sirey
- Jean-Marie Gilardeau et Jean-Pierre Moreau, "Code rural" (2002), Litec
- Joachim Netz, "Grundstückverkehrsgesetz-Praxiskommentar-, 4. Auflage" (2008), Agricola-Verlag GmbH
- Jürgen Lukanow, "Landpachtrecht" (2005), Aschendorff Rechtsverlag Münster
- Margaret Rosso Grossman, "Agrarian land law in the western world : essays about agrarian land policy and regulation in twelve countries of the western world" (1992), C.A.B. International
- Marie-Odile Gain, "Le droit rural, l'exploitant agricole et les terres, 2e édition" (2008), LexisNexis Litec
- "Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Band 3, 5. Aufl" (2006), C.H.Beck
- Patrick Courbe, "Droit civil - Les biens" (2009), Dalloz-Sirey
- Roland Norer, "Lebendiges Agrarrecht" (2005), Springer-Verlag
- Wolfgang Winkler, "Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Pachten in der Landwirtschaft" (1987), AgraR