본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Associations Between L2 Proficiency and Efficacy of Corrective Feedback Types

Yusuke Sato
아시아테플 (AsiaTEFL (The Asian Association of Teachers of English As a Foreign Language))|2022.06|Journal of Asia TEFL|제19권 제2호|pp. 563-576

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

corrective feedbacksecond language proficiencypast progressive

초록

This study examined the relative effectiveness of recasts, explicit correction, and metalinguistic prompts on developing English past progressive forms among second language (L2) learners, and whether the effectiveness of each feedback type was differently associated with L2 proficiency. A total of 197 Japanese learners of English as a foreign language were divided into recast, explicit correction, metalinguistic prompt, task-only, and test control groups. The first three groups performed tasks and received corrective feedback (CF). The task-only group performed the same tasks as the CF groups but did not receive CF. The test control group did not perform the tasks and solely took pretests and posttests. The results showed that explicit types of feedback (explicit correction and metalinguistic prompts) were more effective than implicit feedback (recasts). Further, simple regression analyses showed that L2 proficiency was significantly associated with gains in scores of the recast and metalinguistic prompt groups but not the explicit correction group. These results suggest that L2 proficiency differentially influences the effectiveness of different CF types.

Abstract

This study examined the relative effectiveness of recasts, explicit correction, and metalinguistic prompts on developing English past progressive forms among second language (L2) learners, and whether the effectiveness of each feedback type was differently associated with L2 proficiency. A total of 197 Japanese learners of English as a foreign language were divided into recast, explicit correction, metalinguistic prompt, task-only, and test control groups. The first three groups performed tasks and received corrective feedback (CF). The task-only group performed the same tasks as the CF groups but did not receive CF. The test control group did not perform the tasks and solely took pretests and posttests. The results showed that explicit types of feedback (explicit correction and metalinguistic prompts) were more effective than implicit feedback (recasts). Further, simple regression analyses showed that L2 proficiency was significantly associated with gains in scores of the recast and metalinguistic prompt groups but not the explicit correction group. These results suggest that L2 proficiency differentially influences the effectiveness of different CF types.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Ammar, A., "One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.543~574 (2006)[DOI]
  2. Bowles, M. A., "Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), pp.247~271 (2011)[DOI]
  3. DeKeyser, R., "Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction", pp.94~112 (2015), Routledge
  4. DeKeyser, R., "The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition", pp.15~32 (2017), Routledge
  5. Ellis, R., "Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, pp.141~172 (2005)[DOI]
  6. Ellis, R., "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching", pp.31~64 (2009), Multilingual Matters
  7. Ellis, R., "Understanding second language acquisition" (2015), Oxford University Press
  8. Ellis, R., "Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, pp.339~368 (2006)[DOI]
  9. Erlam, R., "Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge : An empirical validation study", Applied Linguistics, 27, pp.464~491 (2006)[DOI]
  10. "Test Results" (2019)[URL]
  11. Iizuka, T., "Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and feedback exposure conditions", Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 4(1), pp.3~48 (2020)[DOI]
  12. Li, H., "The role of recasts and negotiated prompts in an FL learning context in China with non-English major university students", Language Teaching Research (2019)[DOI]
  13. Li, S., "The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60, pp.309~365 (2010)[DOI]
  14. Li, S., "The interface between feedback type, L2 proficiency, and the nature of the linguistic target", Language Teaching Research, 18(3), pp.373~396 (2014)[DOI]
  15. Long, M. H., "Handbook of second language acquisition", pp.413~468 (1996), Academic Press
  16. Lyster, R., "Different effects of prompts and effects in form-focused instruction", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, pp.399~432 (2004)[DOI]
  17. Lyster, R., "Corrective feedback and learner uptake", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, pp.37~66 (1997)[DOI]
  18. Lyster, R., "Oral feedback in classroom SLA : A meta-analysis", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, pp.265~302 (2010)[DOI]
  19. Lyster, R., "Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition", pp.71~92 (2013), John Benjamins
  20. Mackey, A., "Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?", Modern Language Journal, 82, pp.338~356 (1998)[DOI]
  21. Mackey, A., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies", pp.407~452 (2007), Oxford University Press
  22. Pawlak, M., "The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching", pp.733~753 (2021), Cambridge University Press
  23. Révész, A., "Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures", Language Learning, 62, pp.93~132 (2012)[DOI]
  24. Sagarra, N., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies", pp.229~248 (2007), Oxford University Press
  25. Yusuke Sato, "Effects of Recasts, Explicit Correction and Metalinguistic Prompts on L2 Knowledge of the English Past Tense", Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(2), pp.390~405 (2021), 아시아테플
  26. Schmidt, R. W., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.1~63 (1995), University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center
  27. Schmidt, R. W., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.3~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  28. Sheen, Y., "Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies", pp.301~322 (2007), Oxford University Press
  29. Sheen, Y., "Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2)", pp.593~610 (2011), Routledge
  30. Shirahata, T., "Eigoshidoo ni okeru koukatekina ayamari teisei: Daini gengo syuutoku kenkyuu no chiken kara" (2015), Taishukan Shoten
  31. Yang, Y., "Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), pp.235~263 (2010)[DOI]
  32. Yılmaz, Y., "The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes", Language Learning, 62, pp.1134~1169 (2012)[DOI]
  33. Zhang, R., "Measuring university-level L2 learners’ implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37(3), pp.1~30 (2014)[DOI]
  34. Zhao, Y., "The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study", Language Teaching Research, 26(3), pp.361~381 (2022)[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)

Fostering University Students to Deal with Conflict through Critical Literacy in EFL Reading ClassDumrong Adunyarittigunpp. 398-413Korean Secondary EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Development through the Student-generated Reading Comprehension Test Development: From the Learning-oriented Assessment ApproachGi Jung Kimpp. 414-430Classroom Activities, Classroom Anxiety and Teacher Roles: Three Dimensions Revealing Class Reality of a University English CourseQiang Huangpp. 431-450Investigating Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety Levels Among Saudi Tertiary Students: Gender and Year Level DifferencesMohammad N. Khreisatpp. 451-468English Language Learning Anxiety in Online and Face-to-Face ClassesBehnam Behforouz, Marilyn C. Gallema, Rhona Maria A. Waga, Saif Al Weshahipp. 469-488
원문 보기