본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on State Duties under UNGPs Ensuring Human Rights in the Ship-Recycling Industry

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The adverse human rights impact in the South Asian ship-recycling yards is not uncommon for international shipping industry since beginning of 2000s. Even if preventive measures under the Basel Convention has been established to ensure human rights in these beaching yards, the deteriorated conditions over human rights have rarely experienced improvements for workers and residents. Thus, this paper slightly deviates from current international instruments regulating ship-recycling activities, and then focus on the state duties under IHRL to ensure human rights through UNGPs. Particularly, UNGPs, in order to ensure human rights under the current regime of IHRL including the UDHR and other legal instruments, provides principles which can be applied in relation to business activities of transnational corporate. In particular, as state duties, the UNGPs prescribes state duty to protect against human rights abuses caused by the business activities and to ensure access to effective remedy for the victims. While the UNGPs has not created new obligations of states since it is not an international legal instrument, these obligations should be looked upon derived from the existing international human rights law. Therefore, this paper will examines the state duties under the UNGPs focusing on how to ensure these duties in the ship-recycling industry of South Asia where especially human rights abuses have been severe. These includes development of a new treaty for implementation of the UNGPs for a long-term and domestic measures ensuring effective remedy to the victims for a short- to mid-term.

Abstract

The adverse human rights impact in the South Asian ship-recycling yards is not uncommon for international shipping industry since beginning of 2000s. Even if preventive measures under the Basel Convention has been established to ensure human rights in these beaching yards, the deteriorated conditions over human rights have rarely experienced improvements for workers and residents. Thus, this paper slightly deviates from current international instruments regulating ship-recycling activities, and then focus on the state duties under IHRL to ensure human rights through UNGPs. Particularly, UNGPs, in order to ensure human rights under the current regime of IHRL including the UDHR and other legal instruments, provides principles which can be applied in relation to business activities of transnational corporate. In particular, as state duties, the UNGPs prescribes state duty to protect against human rights abuses caused by the business activities and to ensure access to effective remedy for the victims. While the UNGPs has not created new obligations of states since it is not an international legal instrument, these obligations should be looked upon derived from the existing international human rights law. Therefore, this paper will examines the state duties under the UNGPs focusing on how to ensure these duties in the ship-recycling industry of South Asia where especially human rights abuses have been severe. These includes development of a new treaty for implementation of the UNGPs for a long-term and domestic measures ensuring effective remedy to the victims for a short- to mid-term.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Flag States And Human Rights; A Study on Flag State Practice in Monitoring, Reporting and Enforcing Human Rights Obligations On Board Vessels, "Anthony Morelli", The University of Bristol Human Rights Implementation Centre in partnership with Human Rights At Sea, ~ (2018)
  2. Donald R. Rothwell, "International Law; Cases and Materials with Australian Perspectives" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  3. Emilio Rafael Izquierdo Mino, "Report of the fifth session of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights", UN GAOR, Human Rights Council, ~ (2020)
  4. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, "Gro Harlem Brundtland", UN GAOR, ~ (1987)
  5. International Bar Association, "IBA Practical Guide on Business and Human Rights for Business Lawyers, Business and Human Rights; The Role of the Legal Profession", ~ (2016)
  6. International Justice Resource Centre, "Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies in the United Nations System", ~ (2017)
  7. International Labour Organization, "Ship-breaking: a hazardous work", ~ (2020)
  8. Shipbreaking Practices in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: An Investor Perspective on the Human Rights and Environmental Impacts of Beaching, "International Law and Policy Institute", ~ (2016)
  9. James Crawford, "Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law" (2012), Oxford University Press
  10. John Knox, "Report of the Independent Expert on the issue of human rights obligations relating to the enjoyment of a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment", ~ (2012)
  11. John Ruggie, "Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights:Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy”Framework, HRCOR, 17th session, Agenda Item 3, UN Doc A", HRC, 31, 2011[DOI]
  12. John Ruggie, "Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights" (2013), Norton & Company
  13. John Ruggie, "Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights, HRCOR, 8th sess, Agenda item 3, UN Doc A", HRC, 5, 2008[DOI]
  14. "Annual Report 17", NGO Shipbreaking Platform, ~ (2018)
  15. "Impact Report 2018", 2019, 2020
  16. Okechukwu Ibeanu, "Adverse effects of the illicit movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous products and wastes on the enjoyment of human rights, UN Doc E", CN.4, 45 and Add.1 (8 December 2004) (2005), 2009[DOI]
  17. Pini Pavel Miretski, "Global Business and Human Rights – The UN Norms on the Responsibility of Transnational Corporates and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights – A Requiem’", Deakin Law Review, 17, pp.5~ (2012)
  18. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the adverse effects of the movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous products and wastes on the enjoyment of human rights, "UN HRC", ~ (2009)
  19. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the implications for human rights of the environmentally sound management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes on his mission to Denmark and Greenland, "UN HRC", ~ (2018)
  20. Sarah Joseph, "Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation" (2004), Hart Publishing
  21. UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, "General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of health (Art. 12)", ~ (2000)
  22. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, "General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water (Arts, 11 and 12 of the Covenant), UN CESCROR, 29th sess, UN Doc E", C.12, 11 (2002), 2003[DOI]
  23. UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, "General Comment No. 23 (2016) on the right to just and favourable conditions of work (article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), UN ESCOR, UN Doc E", C.12, 23, 2016[DOI]
  24. UNCTAD, "Review of Maritime Transport 2018", ~ (2018)
  25. 민영훈, "A Case Study On Human Rights Issues In The Ship Recycling Industry", 해사법연구, 30(3), pp.201~228 (2018), 한국해사법학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)