본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Pre-Task Planning in L2 Writing: Pedagogical Benefits and Practical Concerns

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

While previous pre-task planning (PTP) studies tended to adopt a quantitative method (testing, survey), examining its effects on linguistic measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity, qualitative studies that explored students’ perceptions of PTP in practicing L2 writing have been scarce. In an attempt to bridge this gap, this qualitative study, including students’ essays, their reflections, and semi-interviews, was adopted for data collection. A total of three EFL college Vietnamese students were qualified to collect data for indepth analysis. The findings show that students of various levels of English all have positive perceptions of PTP, which helps them reduce cognitive demand and manage time while writing. In addition, PTP has a measurable influence on the quality of writing with regard to higher-level writing skills (content, organization of ideas) in general. For example, students provide relevant information and develop ideas with specific examples in their written performance. It should be noted, however, that composition teachers should consider providing students with explicit instructions and training on how to do PTP appropriately. Students will then know how to apply PTP effectively to their writing practice based on their learning styles. These pedagogical benefits and practical concerns are discussed.

Abstract

While previous pre-task planning (PTP) studies tended to adopt a quantitative method (testing, survey), examining its effects on linguistic measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity, qualitative studies that explored students’ perceptions of PTP in practicing L2 writing have been scarce. In an attempt to bridge this gap, this qualitative study, including students’ essays, their reflections, and semi-interviews, was adopted for data collection. A total of three EFL college Vietnamese students were qualified to collect data for indepth analysis. The findings show that students of various levels of English all have positive perceptions of PTP, which helps them reduce cognitive demand and manage time while writing. In addition, PTP has a measurable influence on the quality of writing with regard to higher-level writing skills (content, organization of ideas) in general. For example, students provide relevant information and develop ideas with specific examples in their written performance. It should be noted, however, that composition teachers should consider providing students with explicit instructions and training on how to do PTP appropriately. Students will then know how to apply PTP effectively to their writing practice based on their learning styles. These pedagogical benefits and practical concerns are discussed.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Alharthi, S., "From instructed writing to free writing : A study of EFL learners", SAGE Open, 11(1), pp.1~15 (2021)[DOI]
  2. Alkhatib, N., "First year university students' writing : A one year journey of English writing development", Asian EFL Journal, 28(1), pp.9~29 (2021)
  3. Bui, P. H., "Depicting and outlining as pre-writing strategies : Experimental results and learners' opinions", International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), pp.451~464 (2018)[DOI]
  4. Phuong Thi Hong Cao, "Task-Based Language Teaching: Affordances and Challenges in TBLT Implementation at the Vietnamese Tertiary Level", Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), pp.510~515 (2018), 아시아테플
  5. Christison, M., "What English language teachers need to know Vol. III: Designing Curriculum" (2014), Routledge
  6. Yoonhee Choe, "Effects of Pre-Task Planning and Source Texts on Korean EFL College Learners’ Summary Writing", Journal of Asia TEFL, 19(1), pp.109~124 (2022), 아시아테플
  7. De Smet, M. J., "Effects of electronic outlining on students' argumentative writing performance", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(6), pp.557~574 (2011)[DOI]
  8. Do, H. M., "Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies on second language Vietnamese undergraduates", Arab World English Journal, 12(1), pp.90~112 (2021)[DOI]
  9. Do, H. M., "Does collaborative prewriting discussion always help", L2 Journal, 15(1), pp.1~7 (2023)[DOI]
  10. Do, H. M., "Pedagogical benefits and practical concerns of writing portfolio assessment : Suggestions for teaching L2 writing", TESL-EJ, 27(1), pp.1~20 (2023)[DOI]
  11. Duong, T. M., "Implementing task-based language teaching in Vietnamese secondary schools : What hinders EFL teachers", TESL-EJ, 25(2), pp.1~15 (2021)
  12. Ellis, R., "The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), pp.59~84 (2004)[DOI]
  13. Ellis, R., "Planning and task performance in a second language (Vol. 11)" (2005), John Benjamins Publishing
  14. Ellis, R., "The effects of pre-task planning on second language writing : A systematic review of experimental studies", Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 44(2), pp.131~165 (2021)[DOI]
  15. Ellis, R., "Does planning before writing help? Options for pre-task planning in the teaching of writing", ELT Journal, 76(1), pp.77~87 (2022)[DOI]
  16. Hashempour, Z., "The effect of brainstorming as a pre-writing strategy on EFL advanced learners’ writing ability", Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(1), pp.86~99 (2015)[DOI]
  17. Hinkel, E., "Effective curriculum for teaching L2 writing: Principles and techniques" (2015), Routledge
  18. Huang, X., "The effect of online collaborative prewriting via DingTalk group on EFL Learners’ writing anxiety and writing performance", International Symposium on Emerging Technologies for Education, pp.48~60 (2021), Springer
  19. Joaquin, A. D. L., "Examining prewriting strategies in L2 writing: Do they really work?", Asian EFL Journal, 18(2), pp.156~181 (2016)
  20. Johnson, M. D., "Does planning really help? Effectiveness of planning in L2 writing", Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 3(1), pp.107~118 (2014)
  21. Johnson, M. D., "The effect of planning sub-processes on L2 writing fluency, grammatical complexity, and lexical complexity", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(3), pp.264~282 (2012)[DOI]
  22. Kellogg, R. T., "Attentional overload and writing performance: Effects of rough draft and outline strategies", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2), pp.355~365 (1988)[DOI]
  23. Kellogg, R. T., "Effectiveness of prewriting strategies as a function of task demands", The American Journal of Psychology, 103(3), pp.327~342 (1990)
  24. Kellogg, R. T., "The Science of Writing", pp.57~71 (1996)
  25. Kellogg, R., "Training writing skills : A cognitive developmental perspective", Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), pp.1~26 (2008)[DOI]
  26. Kieft, M., "The effects of adapting a writing course to students’ writing strategies", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, pp.565~578 (2011)[DOI]
  27. Mokhtari, K., "Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies", Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), pp.249~259 (2002)[DOI]
  28. Neumann, H., "Exploring student interaction during collaborative prewriting discussions and its relationship to L2 writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, pp.84~104 (2015)[DOI]
  29. Nguyen, P. N. T., "Learning to write: Effects of prewriting tasks on English writings of Vietnamese students", Asian EFL journal, 20(9-1), pp.57~74 (2018)
  30. Nguyen, P. N. T., "Effects of rhetorical text analysis on idea generation and text quality", ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171(2), pp.280~306 (2020)[DOI]
  31. Thi Thuy Loan Nguyen, "Learning EFL Writing in Vietnam: Voices from An Upper-Secondary School’s Students", Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(4), pp.1195~1210 (2021), 아시아테플
  32. Ojima, M., "Concept mapping as pre-task planning : A case study of three Japanese ESL writers", System, 34(4), pp.566~585 (2006)[DOI]
  33. Rao, Z., "Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills", ELT journal, 61(2), pp.100~106 (2007)[DOI]
  34. Rostamian, M., "The effect of planning time on cognitive processes, monitoring behavior, and quality of L2 writing", Language Teaching Research, 22(4), pp.418~438 (2018)[DOI]
  35. Tabari, M. A., "The effects of planning time on complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexical variety in L2 descriptive writing", Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), pp.1~15 (2016)[DOI]
  36. Tabari, M. A., "Task preparedness and L2 written production : Investigating effects of planning modes on L2 learners’ focus of attention and output", Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, pp.1~14 (2021)[DOI]
  37. Thorne, S., "Prewriting : A basic skill for basic writers", Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 20(1), pp.31~36 (1993)
  38. Tomlinson, B., "The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to EFL methodology", Language Teaching Research, 8(2), pp.199~222 (2004)[DOI]
  39. Tompkins, G. E., "Literacy for the 21st century : A balanced approach" (2001), Merrill Prentice Hall
  40. Tonogbanua, J. R., "Exploring collaborative e-portfolio project for teaching and learning academic writing", Asian EFL Journal Research Article, 20(12.3), pp.173~193 (2018)
  41. Torrance, M., "The writing strategies of graduate research students in the social sciences", Higher Education, 27, pp.379~392 (1994)
  42. Walvoord, B. E., "Functions of outlining among college students in four disciplines", Research in the Teaching of English, pp.390~421 (1995)
  43. Weigle, S. C., "Assessing writing" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  44. Weigle, S. C., "Considerations for teaching second language writing. In M", ~ (2014)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)