인공와우이식 아동의 운율 특성 - 조음속도와 쉼, 지속시간을 중심으로 -
The Prosodic Characteristics of Children with Cochlear Implant with Respect to the Articulation Rate, Pause, and Duration
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research reports the prosodic characteristics (including articulation speech rate, pause characteristics, duration) of children with cochlear implants with reference to those of children with normal hearing. Subjects are 8-to 10-year-old children,balancing each number of gender as 24. Dialogue speech data are comprised of four types of sentence patterns. Results show that 1) there’s a statistically meaningful difference on articulation speech rate between the two groups. 2) On pauses, they are not observed in exclamatory and declarative sentences in normal children. While imperative sentences show no statistical difference on the number of pauses between the two groups, interrogative sentences do. 3) Declarative, exclamatory, and interrogative sentences reveal statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the sentence's final two-syllable word duration, showing no difference on imperative sentences. 4) When it comes to the RFP (duration ratio of sentence final syllable to penultimate syllable), we no statistically meaningful difference between the two groups in all types of sentences exists. 5)Lastly, RWS (the ratio of sentence final two syllable word duration to that of whole sentence duration) shows statistical difference between two groups in imperative sentences, but not in all the rest types.
Abstract
This research reports the prosodic characteristics (including articulation speech rate, pause characteristics, duration) of children with cochlear implants with reference to those of children with normal hearing. Subjects are 8-to 10-year-old children,balancing each number of gender as 24. Dialogue speech data are comprised of four types of sentence patterns. Results show that 1) there’s a statistically meaningful difference on articulation speech rate between the two groups. 2) On pauses, they are not observed in exclamatory and declarative sentences in normal children. While imperative sentences show no statistical difference on the number of pauses between the two groups, interrogative sentences do. 3) Declarative, exclamatory, and interrogative sentences reveal statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the sentence's final two-syllable word duration, showing no difference on imperative sentences. 4) When it comes to the RFP (duration ratio of sentence final syllable to penultimate syllable), we no statistically meaningful difference between the two groups in all types of sentences exists. 5)Lastly, RWS (the ratio of sentence final two syllable word duration to that of whole sentence duration) shows statistical difference between two groups in imperative sentences, but not in all the rest types.
참고문헌 (40)
- 고현주, "한국어에서의 공손함을 나타내는 운율적 특성에 관한 연구", 말소리, (45), pp.15~22 (2003), 대한음성학회
- 김선철, "발화 속도에 따른 운율 단위의 빈도 변이에 대한 시험적 연구", 언어학, (53), pp.225~254 (2009), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 김선희, "한국어 원거리 음성의 지속시간 연구", 말소리, (54호), pp.1~14 (2005), 대한음성학회
- 김진영, "최중도 청각장애아동과 건청아동의 올림조와 내림조 억양의 산출 비교", 석사, pp.2003
- 성철재, "한국어 대화체 음성의 운율 분석 - 낭독체와의 비교를 통하여", 한글, (239), pp.75~94 (1998)
- 오순영, "인공와우 이식(Cochlear Implant) 아동의 운율 특성 : 발화속도와 억양기울기를 중심으로", 석사, pp.2011
- 오순영, "인공와우이식 아동의 운율 특성 - 발화속도와 억양기울기를 중심으로 -", 말소리와 음성과학, 3(3), pp.157~165 (2011), 한국음성학회
- 윤미선, "와우이식 후 아동의 말 명료도에 영향을 주는 와우이식 관련 요인", 아시아-태평양 와우이식 및 관련 과학 심포지엄, pp.84~89 (2001)
- 윤미선, "청각장애인과 건청인의 말 속도와 쉼 특성 비교", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 9(1), pp.15~29 (2004), 한국언어청각임상학회
- 윤미선, "청력수준에 따른 초등학교 아동의 기본주파수 비교", 말소리, 0(52), pp.49~60 (2004), 대한음성학회
- 이숙향, "한국어 운율구조와 관련한 모음 및 음절길이", 말소리, (35), pp.13~24 (1998)
- 김수진, "뇌성마비 성인 발화의 운율특징", 대한음성학회 한국음성과학회 공동학술대회, pp.49~51 (2007), 대한음성학회, 한국음성과학회
- 최은아, "심도 청각장애 아동의 발성특성: 강도, 음도 및 그 변동률을 중심으로", 말소리와 음성과학, 2(1), pp.135~145 (2010), 한국음성학회
- 최현주, "심도 청각장애아동과 정상아동의 소리내어 읽기속도와 쉼특성 비교", 석사, pp.2001
- 정행임, "인공와우 이식 아동과 건청 아동의 이중모음 산출에 대한 음향학적 특성 비교", 석사, pp.2010
- Adi-Bensaid, L, "The acquisition of theprosodic word by children with hearing loss using a cochlearimplant", The Volta Review, 109(1), pp.5~31 (2009)
- Allen, G. D., "Production ofsentence-final intonation contours by hearing-impaired children", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 43, pp.441~455 (2000)
- Blamey, P. J., "Phonetic inventorydevelopment in young cochlear implant users 6 years postoperation", Journal of Speech, Language, and HearingResearch, 44, pp.73~79 (2001)
- (2011)[URL]
- Dawson, P. W., "A clinical report onspeech production of cochlear implant users", Ear & Hearing, 16, pp.551~561 (1995)
- Ertmer, D. J., "Beginning to talk at 20months: Early vocal development in a young cochlear implantrecipient", Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, pp.192~206 (2001)
- Ertmer, D. J., "Speech production andvariability in young cochlear implant recipients: comparisonswith typically developing age-peers", Journal of Speech,Language, and Hearing Research, 54, pp.177~189 (2011)
- Geers, A. E., "Effects of cochlear implantsand tactile aids on the development of speech production skillsin children with profound hearing impairment", The VoltaReview, 94(5), pp.135~163 (1992)
- Leder, S. B., "Speaking rate of adventitiously deafmale cochlear implant candidates", Journal of the AcousticSociety of America, 82, pp.843~846 (1987)
- Lenden, J. M., "Prosody and voicecharacteristics of children with cochlear implants", Journal ofCommunication disorders, 40(1), pp.66~81 (2007)
- Mondain, M., "Speech perception skills andspeech production intelligibility French children with prelingualdeafness and cochlear implants", Journal of Otolaryngology,Head & Neck Surgery, 123, pp.181~184 (1997)
- Munro, M. J, "Modeling perceptions ofthe accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech-The roleof speaking rate", Studies on Second Language Aquisition, 23, pp.451~468 (2001)
- Osberger, M. J., "Speech intelligibility in the hearingimpaired: Research and clinical implications, In Intelligibility in Speech Disorders" (1992), JohnBenjamins
- Osberger, M. J., "Speech productioncharacteristics of the hearing impaired", Speech and Language, 8, pp.221~283 (1982)
- Osberger, M. J, "Speechintelligibility of children with cochlear implants, tactile aids, orhearing aids", Journal of Speech, Language, and HearingResearch, 36, pp.186~203 (1993)
- Peng, S. C., "Imitative production of rising speech intonation in pediatriccochlear implant recipients", Journal of Speech, Language, andHearing Research, 50, pp.1210~1227 (2007)
- Sehgal, S. T., "Imitative consonant feature production bychildren with multichannel sensory aids", Ear and Hearing, 19(1), pp.72~84 (1998)
- Seyfried, D., "Language and speach of thedeaf and hard of hearing, In Introduction to audiological rehabilitation" (1996), Allyn and Bacon
- Snow, D., "The development of intonation inyoung children with cochlear implants: a preliminary study ofthe influence of age at implantation and length of implantexperience", Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(9), pp.665~679 (2009)
- Svirsky, M. A., "Speech production, In Cochlear implants" (2000), Thieme
- Tobey, E. A., "Speech production performance inchildren with multichannel cochlear implants", AmericanJournal of Otology, 12(S), pp.165~173 (1991)
- Tobey, E. A., "Factors associated with development of speechproduction skills in children implanted by age five", Ear andHearing, 24, pp.36~45 (2003)
- Tsao, Y. C, "Interspeaker variation inhabitual speaking rate: Evidence for a neuromuscularcomponent", Journal of Speech, Language, and HearingResearch, 40, pp.858~866 (1997)
- Tye-Murray, N, "Vowel and diphthongproduction by young users of cochlear implants and therelationship between the phone level evaluation andspontaneous speech", Journal of Speech, Language, and HearingResearch, 36(3), pp.488~502 (1993)
- Tye-Murray, N., "Aquisitionof speech by children who have prolonged cochlear implantexperience", Journal of Speech, Language, and HearingResearch, 38, pp.327~337 (1995)