음성 신호 분류에 따른 장애 음성의 변동률 분석, 비선형 동적 분석, 캡스트럼 분석의 유용성
The Utility of Perturbation, Non-linear dynamic, and Cepstrum measures of dysphonia according to Signal Typing
2
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current study assessed the utility of acoustic analyses the most commonly used in routine clinical voice assessmentincluding perturbation, nonlinear dynamic analysis, and Spectral/Cepstrum analysis based on signal typing of dysphonic voicesand investigated their applicability of clinical acoustic analysis methods. A total of 70 dysphonic voice samples wereclassified with signal typing using narrowband spectrogram. Traditional parameters of %jitter, %shimmer, and signal-to-noiseratio were calculated for the signals using TF32 and correlation dimension(D2) of nonlinear dynamic parameter andspectral/cepstral measures including mean CPP, CPP_sd, CPPf0, CPPf0_sd, L/H ratio, and L/H ratio_sd were also calculatedwith ADSV(Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and VoiceTM). Auditory perceptual analysis was performed by two blindedspeech-language pathologists with GRBAS. The results showed that nearly periodic Type 1 signals were all functionaldysphonia and Type 4 signals were comprised of neurogenic and organic voice disorders. Only Type 1 voice signals werereliable for perturbation analysis in this study. Significant signal typing-related differences were found in all acoustic andauditory-perceptual measures. SNR, CPP, L/H ratio values for Type 4 were significantly lower than those of other voicesignals and significant higher %jitter, %shimmer were observed in Type 4 voice signals(p<.001). Additionally, with increaseof signal type, D2 values significantly increased and more complex and nonlinear patterns were represented. Nevertheless,voice signals with highly noise component associated with breathiness were not able to obtain D2. In particular, CPP, washighly sensitive with voice quality ‘G', 'R', 'B' than any other acoustic measures. Thus, Spectral and cepstral analyses may beapplied for more severe dysphonic voices such as Type 4 signals and CPP can be more accurate and predictive acousticmarker in measuring voice quality and severity in dysphonia.
Abstract
The current study assessed the utility of acoustic analyses the most commonly used in routine clinical voice assessmentincluding perturbation, nonlinear dynamic analysis, and Spectral/Cepstrum analysis based on signal typing of dysphonic voicesand investigated their applicability of clinical acoustic analysis methods. A total of 70 dysphonic voice samples wereclassified with signal typing using narrowband spectrogram. Traditional parameters of %jitter, %shimmer, and signal-to-noiseratio were calculated for the signals using TF32 and correlation dimension(D2) of nonlinear dynamic parameter andspectral/cepstral measures including mean CPP, CPP_sd, CPPf0, CPPf0_sd, L/H ratio, and L/H ratio_sd were also calculatedwith ADSV(Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and VoiceTM). Auditory perceptual analysis was performed by two blindedspeech-language pathologists with GRBAS. The results showed that nearly periodic Type 1 signals were all functionaldysphonia and Type 4 signals were comprised of neurogenic and organic voice disorders. Only Type 1 voice signals werereliable for perturbation analysis in this study. Significant signal typing-related differences were found in all acoustic andauditory-perceptual measures. SNR, CPP, L/H ratio values for Type 4 were significantly lower than those of other voicesignals and significant higher %jitter, %shimmer were observed in Type 4 voice signals(p<.001). Additionally, with increaseof signal type, D2 values significantly increased and more complex and nonlinear patterns were represented. Nevertheless,voice signals with highly noise component associated with breathiness were not able to obtain D2. In particular, CPP, washighly sensitive with voice quality ‘G', 'R', 'B' than any other acoustic measures. Thus, Spectral and cepstral analyses may beapplied for more severe dysphonic voices such as Type 4 signals and CPP can be more accurate and predictive acousticmarker in measuring voice quality and severity in dysphonia.
참고문헌 (17)
- Awan, S. N., "Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia", Journal of Voice, 19(2), pp.268~282 (2005)
- Awan, S. N., "Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech : application of a multi-parameter spectral", cepstral model, 2009, pp.23(11), 825~841
- Awan, S. N., "Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral", cepstral-based acoustic index : comparison with auditory-perceptual judgments from the CAPE-V, 2010, pp.24(9), 742~758
- Balasubramanium, R. K., "Cepstral analysis of voice in unilateral adductor vocal fold palsy", Journal of Voice, 25(3), pp.326~329 (2011)
- Carding, P. N., "The reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality", Clinical Otolaryngology and allied Sciences, 29(5), pp.538~544 (2004)
- Choi, S. H., "Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis", Journal of Voice, 26(5), pp.566~576 (2012)
- Heman-Ackah, Y. D., "Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia", The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 112(4), pp.324~333 (2003)
- Jiang, J. J., "Chaos in voice, from modeling to measurement", Journal of Voice, 20, pp.2~17 (2006)
- 강영애, "성대마비로 인한 기식 음성에 대한 Cepstral 분석", 말소리와 음성과학, 4(2), pp.89~94 (2012), 한국음성학회[DOI]
- Maryn, Y., "Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality : a meta-analysis", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(5), pp.2619~2634 (2009)
- Radish, K. B., "Cepstral analysis of voice in persons with vocal nodules", Journal of Voice, 24(6), pp.651~653 (2010)
- 서인효, "연결발화에서 마비말화자의 음질 특성", 말소리와 음성과학, 5(4), pp.33~41 (2013), 한국음성학회[DOI]
- 심희정, "식도발성화자 음성의 spectral & cepstral 분석", 말소리와 음성과학, 6(2), pp.47~54 (2014), 한국음성학회[DOI]
- Sprecher, A., "Updating signal typing in voice : addition of type 4 signals", Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 127(6), pp.3710~3716 (2010)
- Titze, I. R., "Workshop on acoustic voice analysis: Summary statement" (1995), National Center for Voice and Speech
- Yang, A. C., "Cognitive and neuropsychiatric correlates of EEG dynamic complexity in patients with Alzheimer's disease", Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology, 47, pp.52~61 (2013)
- Zhang, Y., "Acoustic analyses of sustained and running voices from patients with laryngeal pathologies", Journal of Voice, 22, pp.1~9 (2008)