발화조건에 따른 기본주파수 및 음성강도 변동의 특징
Variance characteristics of speaking fundamental frequency and vocal intensity depending on utterance conditions
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to characterize and determine variances of speaking fundamental frequency and vocal intensity depending on gender and three utterance conditions (spontaneous speech, reading, and counting). A total of 65undergraduate students (32 male students, 33 female students) attending universities in Daegu, South Korea participated in this study. The subjects were all in their 20s. This study used KayPENTAX’s Visi-Pitch Ⅳ (Model 3950) to measure the variances of speaking fundamental frequency (SFF0) and vocal intensity (VI). As a result, this study came to the following conclusions. First, it was found that both males and females showed no significant difference in SFF0 and vocal intensity among three utterance conditions. Second, this study sought to analyze differences in the variances of SFF0 between males and females. As a result, it was found that females showed significantly higher levels of four measured variances (SFF0 SD**, SFF0range***, Min SFF0*** and Max SFF0***) than males on spontaneous speech. However, it was found that there was no significant difference between males and females in SFF0 range on reading or in SFF0 SD and SFF0 range on counting. It was found that there was no significant difference between males and females in the level of measured variances of vocal intensity depending on utterance conditions. Finally, this study made a comparison and analysis on differences in the variances of SFF0 and vocal intensity among utterance conditions. As a result, it was found that all the measured variances of SFF0 in males were most significantly reduced depending upon spontaneous speech which was followed by reading and counting respectively (SFF0 SD: p<.001, SFF0 range: p<.05, Max SFF0: p<.05). Females however, show no significant difference in the measured variances of SFF0 depending upon three utterance conditions. It was also found that the measured variances of vocal intensity in females were most significantly reduced depending on spontaneous speech that was followed by reading and counting (VI SD: p<.001, VI range: p<.001, Min VI: p<.01 Max VI: p<.05), while males showed no significant difference in the measured variances of vocal intensity depending on three utterance conditions. In sum, these findings suggest that variances of SFF0 in males are affected by three utterance conditions, while variances of vocal intensity in females are affected by three utterance conditions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to characterize and determine variances of speaking fundamental frequency and vocal intensity depending on gender and three utterance conditions (spontaneous speech, reading, and counting). A total of 65undergraduate students (32 male students, 33 female students) attending universities in Daegu, South Korea participated in this study. The subjects were all in their 20s. This study used KayPENTAX’s Visi-Pitch Ⅳ (Model 3950) to measure the variances of speaking fundamental frequency (SFF0) and vocal intensity (VI). As a result, this study came to the following conclusions. First, it was found that both males and females showed no significant difference in SFF0 and vocal intensity among three utterance conditions. Second, this study sought to analyze differences in the variances of SFF0 between males and females. As a result, it was found that females showed significantly higher levels of four measured variances (SFF0 SD**, SFF0range***, Min SFF0*** and Max SFF0***) than males on spontaneous speech. However, it was found that there was no significant difference between males and females in SFF0 range on reading or in SFF0 SD and SFF0 range on counting. It was found that there was no significant difference between males and females in the level of measured variances of vocal intensity depending on utterance conditions. Finally, this study made a comparison and analysis on differences in the variances of SFF0 and vocal intensity among utterance conditions. As a result, it was found that all the measured variances of SFF0 in males were most significantly reduced depending upon spontaneous speech which was followed by reading and counting respectively (SFF0 SD: p<.001, SFF0 range: p<.05, Max SFF0: p<.05). Females however, show no significant difference in the measured variances of SFF0 depending upon three utterance conditions. It was also found that the measured variances of vocal intensity in females were most significantly reduced depending on spontaneous speech that was followed by reading and counting (VI SD: p<.001, VI range: p<.001, Min VI: p<.01 Max VI: p<.05), while males showed no significant difference in the measured variances of vocal intensity depending on three utterance conditions. In sum, these findings suggest that variances of SFF0 in males are affected by three utterance conditions, while variances of vocal intensity in females are affected by three utterance conditions.
참고문헌 (30)
- Andrews, M. L., "Manual of voice treatment: Pediatricsthrough geriatrics" (2006), Delmar Publishers
- Aronson, A. E., "Clinical voicedisorders" (2009), Thieme MedicalPublishers, Inc
- Awan, S. N., "The voice diagnostic protocol: Apractical guide to the diagnosis of voice disorders" (2001), Pro-Ed Inc
- Awan, S. N., "Superimposition of speaking voicecharacteristics and phonetograms in untrained and trainedvocal groups", Journal of Voice, 7, pp.30~37 (1993)
- Baken, R., "Clinical measurement ofspeech and voice" (2000), SingularPublishing Group, Inc
- Benjamin, B. J., "Frequency variability in the agedvoice", Journal of Gerontology, 36, pp.722~726 (1981)
- Boone, D. R., "The voice and voice therapy" (2009), Allyn and Bacon
- Brown, W. S., "Phonational profiles of female professional singersand nonsingers", Journal of Voice, 7, pp.219~226 (1993)
- Carole, T. F., "Speech Science: An Integrated approachto theory and clinical practice" (2006), Allynand Bacon
- Case, J. L., "Clinical Management of Voice Disorders" (2002), Pro-Ed Inc
- Chen, S. H., "Sex differences in frequency and intensityin reading and voice range profiles for Taiwanese adultspeakers", Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 59, pp.1~9 (2007)
- Colton, R. H., "Understanding voice problems: A physiological perspectivefor diagnosis and treatment" (2006), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Duffy, J. R., "Motor speech disorder: Substrates,differential diagnosis, and management" (2005), Elsevier Inc
- Fitch, J. L., "Consistency of fundamental frequency andperturbation in repeated phonations of sustained vowels,reading, and connected speech", Journal of Speech andHearing Disorders, 55, pp.360~363 (1990)
- Gelfer, M. P, "Comparisons ofintensity measures and their stability in male and femalespeakers", Journal of Voice, 11, pp.178~186 (1997)
- Hacki, T., "Comparative speaking, shouting and singingvoice range profile measurements: physiological andpathological aspects", Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 21, pp.123~129 (1996)
- Hirano, M., "Clinical examination of voice" (1981), Springer-Verlag
- Hollien, H., "Effects ofthree parameters on speaking fundamental frequency", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, pp.2984~2992 (1997)
- Hudson, A. I., "A study of the readingfundamental vocal frequency of young black adults", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, pp.197~201 (1981)
- Ma, E., "Reliability of speaking and maximumvoice range measures in screening for dysphonia", Journalof Voice, 21, pp.397~406 (2006)
- Morris, R. J., "Age-related differencesin speech intensity among adult female", Folia Phoniatricaet Logopaedica, 46, pp.64~69 (1984)
- Morris, R. J., "Phonational profiles of male trained singers andnonsingers", Journal of Voice, 9, pp.142~148 (1995)
- Murray, T., "Patterns offundamental frequency for three types of voice samples", Journal of Voice, 9, pp.282~289 (1995)
- Pegoraro Krook, M. I, "Speaking fundamentalfrequency characteristics of normal Swedish subjectsobtained by glottal frequency analysis", Folia Phoniatrica etLogopaedica, 40, pp.82~90 (1988)
- Robb, M., "Developmental trends invocal fundamental frequency of young children", Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, pp.420~429 (1985)
- Sapienza, C. M., "Aerodynamic and acousticcharacteristics of the adult African American voice", Journalof Voice, 77, pp.410~416 (1997)
- Shrivastav, R., "Effectsof stimulation techniques on vocal responses: implicationsfor assessment and treatment", Journal of Voice, 14, pp.322~330 (2000)
- Titze, I. R., "Physiologic and acoustic differencesbetween male and female voices.", Journal of AcousticalSociety of America, 85, pp.1699~1707 (1989)
- Zraick, R. I., "The effect of task on determination of maximumphonational frequency range", Journal of Voice, 14, pp.154~160 (2000)
- Zraick, R. I., "The effects of task on determination of habitualloudness", Journal of Voice, 18, pp.176~182 (2004)