Assessment of Upper Extremity Function in People With Stroke Based on the Framework of the ICF: A Narrative Review

키워드

참고문헌 (77)

1. Long AF, "Measuring health status and outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis within routine clinical practice", Br J Rheumatol, 33, pp.682~685 (1994)
2. Metcalf C, "A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF", Musculoskelet Care, 5, pp.160~173 (2007)
3. World Health Organization (WHO), "International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)" (2001), World Health Organization
4. Gladstone DJ, "The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke : a critical review of its measurement properties", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 16, pp.232~240 (2002)
5. Brunnstrom S, "Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia : based on sequential recovery stages", Phys Ther, 46, pp.357~375 (1966)
6. Twitchell TE, "The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man", Brain, 74, pp.443~480 (1951)
7. Fugl-Meyer AR, "The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance", Scand J Rehabil Med, 7, pp.13~31 (1975)
8. Poole JL, "Assessments of motor function post stroke", Phys Occup Ther Geriatr, 19, pp.1~22 (2001)
9. Kwakkel G, "Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials : consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable", Int J Stroke, 12, pp.451~461 (2017)
10. Hiragami S, "Minimal clinically important difference for the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity in convalescent stroke patients with moderate to severe hemiparesis", J Phys Ther Sci, 31, pp.917~921 (2019)
11. Page SJ, "Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke", Phys Ther, 92, pp.791~798 (2012)
12. Arya KN, "Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients", Top Stroke Rehabil, 18(Suppl 1), pp.599~610 (2011)
13. Santisteban L, "Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies : a systematic literature review", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0154792~ (2016)
14. See J, "A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and its implications for clinical trials", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 27, pp.732~741 (2013)
15. Kim Tae-lim, "The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45(2), pp.83~98 (2021), 대한재활의학회[DOI]
16. Tran VD, "Kinematic measures for upper limb robot-assisted therapy following stroke and correlations with clinical outcome measures : a review", Med Eng Phys, 53, pp.13~31 (2018)
17. Sivan M, "Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke", J Rehabil Med, 43, pp.181~189 (2011)
18. Kwakkel G, "Standardized measurement of quality of upper limb movement after stroke : consensus-based core recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable", Int J Stroke, 14, pp.783~791 (2019)
19. Yozbatiran N, "A standardized approach to performing the Action Research Arm Test", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22, pp.78~90 (2008)
20. Van der Lee JH, "The intra-and interrater reliability of the Action Research Arm Test : a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, pp.14~19 (2001)
21. Hsieh CL, "Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research Arm Test in stroke patients", Age Ageing, 27, pp.107~113 (1998)
22. Morris DM, "The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82, pp.750~755 (2001)
23. Wolf SL, "Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients", Exp Neurol, 104, pp.125~132 (1989)
24. Lang CE, "Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89, pp.1693~1700 (2008)
25. 박창식, "한글판 Wolf 운동 기능 검사의 검사자간 및 검사자 내 신뢰도", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(3), pp.317~322 (2005), 대한재활의학회
26. Park CS, "Validity and reliability of Korean Wolf Motor Function Test", J Korean Soc Occup Ther, 12, pp.49~60 (2004)
27. Jebsen RH, "An objective and standardized test of hand function", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 50, pp.311~319 (1969)
28. Hackel ME, "Changes in hand function in the aging adult as determined by the Jebsen Test of Hand Function", Phys Ther, 72, pp.373~377 (1992)
29. Culicchia G, "Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test in an Italian population", Rehabil Res Pract, 2016, pp.8970917~ (2016)
30. Lin SH, "Use of standardized assessments and online resources in stroke rehabilitation", Open J Occup Ther, 7, pp.1~22 (2019)
31. Sığırtmaç İC, "Investigation of reliability, validity, and cutoffvalue of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test", J Hand Ther, 34, pp.396~403 (2021)
32. Schaefer SY, "Within-session practice effects in the Jebsen Hand Function Test(JHFT)", Am J Occup Ther, 72, pp.7206345010~ (2018)
33. Kim B, "Assessment of hand function in normal Korean children by Jebsen Hand Function Test", J Korean Acad Rehabil Med, 11, pp.102~106 (1987)
34. Kim Y, "Assessment of hand function in normal Korean adults by Jebsen Hand Function Test", J Korean Acad Rehabil Med, 8, pp.109~114 (1984)
35. Tiffin J, "The Purdue Pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity", J Appl Psychol, 32, pp.234~247 (1948)
36. Reddon JR, "Purdue Pegboard : test-retest estimates", Percept Mot Skills, 66, pp.503~506 (1988)
37. Strauss E, "A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms, and commentary" (2006), Oxford University Press
38. Kang Y, "Purdue Pegboard standardization for occupational evaluation of persons with disabilities", Disabil Employ, 14, pp.85~96 (2004)
39. Lindstrom D, "Examining the Purdue Pegboard Test for occupational therapy practice", Open J Occup Ther, 3 (2015)
40. Sommerfeld DK, "Spasticity after stroke : its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations", Stroke, 35, pp.134~139 (2004)
41. Wang YC, "Assessing dexterity function : a comparison of two alternatives for the NIH Toolbox", J Hand Ther, 24, pp.313~320 (2011)
42. Chen HM, "Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 23, pp.435~440 (2009)
43. da Silva LC, "Nine-hole peg test for evaluation of hand function : the advantages and shortcomings", Neurol India, 65, pp.1033~1034 (2017)
44. Desrosiers J, "Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people : reliability, validity, and norms studies", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, pp.751~755 (1994)
45. Mathiowetz V, "Box and Block Test of manual dexterity : norms for 6-19 year olds", Can J Occup Ther, 52, pp.241~245 (1985)
46. Liang KJ, "Measurement properties of the Box and Block Test in children with unilateral cerebral palsy", Sci Rep, 11, pp.20955~ (2021)
47. Oliveira CS, "Use of the Box and Block Test for the evaluation of manual dexterity in individuals with central nervous system disorders : a systematic review", Man Ther Posturolog Rehabil J, 14, pp.436~ (2016)
48. Higgins J, "Upper-limb function and recovery in the acute phase poststroke", J Rehabil Res Dev, 42, pp.65~76 (2005)
49. Ashford S, "Evaluation of functional outcome measures for the hemiparetic upper limb : a systematic review", J Rehabil Med, 40, pp.787~795 (2008)
50. Taub E, "Constraint-induced movement therapy and massed practice", Stroke, 31, pp.986~988 (2000)
51. Chen S, "Minimal detectable change of the actual amount of use test and the Motor Activity Log : the EXCITE Trial", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 26, pp.507~514 (2012)
52. Uswatte G, "Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use", Stroke, 36, pp.2493~2496 (2005)
53. Lloyd-Jones D, "Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update : a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee", Circulation, 119, pp.e21~e181 (2009)
54. Chumney D, "Ability of Functional Independence Measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population : systematic review", J Rehabil Res Dev, 47, pp.17~29 (2010)
55. Linacre JM, "The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, pp.127~132 (1994)
56. Black TM, "Using the Functional Independence Measure instrument to predict stroke rehabilitation outcomes", Rehabil Nurs, 24, pp.109~114 (1999)
57. Ottenbacher KJ, "The reliability of the Functional Independence Measure : a quantitative review", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 77, pp.1226~1232 (1996)
58. Hsueh IP, "Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure, 5 item Barthel Index, and 10 item Barthel Index in patients with stroke", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 73, pp.188~190 (2002)
59. Beninato M, "Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87, pp.32~39 (2006)
60. 정한영, "한글판 수정바델지수(K-MBI)의 개발: 뇌졸중 환자 대상의 다기관 연구", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31(3), pp.283~297 (2007), 대한재활의학회
61. Shah S, "Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation", J Clin Epidemiol, 42, pp.703~709 (1989)
62. Hsieh YW, "Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 21, pp.233~238 (2007)
63. Audebert HJ, "Effects of the implementation of a telemedical stroke network : the Telemedic Pilot Project for Integrative Stroke Care(TEMPiS)in Bavaria, Germany", Lancet Neurol, 5, pp.742~748 (2006)
64. Duncan PW, "The Stroke Impact Scale version 2. 0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change", Stroke, 30, pp.2131~2140 (1999)
65. Duncan PW, "Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale : the Stroke Impact Scale", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, pp.950~963 (2003)
66. Jenkinson C, "The Stroke Impact Scale : validation in a UK setting and development of a SIS short form and SIS index", Stroke, 44, pp.2532~2535 (2013)
67. Mulder M, "Stroke Impact Scale", J Physiother, 62, pp.117~ (2016)
68. Lin KC, "Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Stroke Impact Scale in stroke patients", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 24, pp.486~492 (2010)
69. Stewart JC, "Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke", Stroke, 44, pp.1111~1116 (2013)
70. 최성욱, "Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(3), pp.387~393 (2017), 대한재활의학회
71. Fisher AG, "Assessment of Motor and Process Skills: Volume 1: Development, standardization, and administration manual" (2010), Three Star Press
72. Law M, "The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure : an outcome measure for occupational therapy", Can J Occup Ther, 57, pp.82~87 (1990)
73. Yang SY, "The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with stroke : a systematic review", J Phys Ther Sci, 29, pp.548~555 (2017)
74. Chan CC, "Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure", Occup Ther Int, 4, pp.231~249 (1997)
75. Cup EH, "Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients", Clin Rehabil, 17, pp.402~409 (2003)
76. Jansa J, "The use of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure(COPM)in clients with an acute stroke", World Fed Occup Ther Bull, 50, pp.18~23 (2004)
77. Toomey M, "The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure", Can J Occup Ther, 62, pp.242~249 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천