KODISA Journals and Strategies
1
조회
0
다운로드
18
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose –The purpose of this study was to review and analyze the four major journals of KODISA and all of their published articles of 2014 and to revise and update the existing publication standards and practices in order to improve the overall quality and reputation of these journals. Research design, data, and methodology – This study applied an analytical approach, a case study method, to analyze and examine the published articles and the publication standards and practices of four KODISA journals, JDS (1999), IJIDB (2010), EAJBM (2011), and JAFEB (2014), from their first publication. Results – In 2014, KODISA journals published a total of 171 papers – JDS (122), IJIDB and EAJBM (16 each), and JAFEB (17): 94 articles in general business and 77 articles in economics. Conclusions – KODISA journals continuously revised and updated their publication standards and practices and adopted technological support systems to enable its journals to remain independent and open access in order to ultimately become one of the world’s reputable journals.
Abstract
Purpose –The purpose of this study was to review and analyze the four major journals of KODISA and all of their published articles of 2014 and to revise and update the existing publication standards and practices in order to improve the overall quality and reputation of these journals. Research design, data, and methodology – This study applied an analytical approach, a case study method, to analyze and examine the published articles and the publication standards and practices of four KODISA journals, JDS (1999), IJIDB (2010), EAJBM (2011), and JAFEB (2014), from their first publication. Results – In 2014, KODISA journals published a total of 171 papers – JDS (122), IJIDB and EAJBM (16 each), and JAFEB (17): 94 articles in general business and 77 articles in economics. Conclusions – KODISA journals continuously revised and updated their publication standards and practices and adopted technological support systems to enable its journals to remain independent and open access in order to ultimately become one of the world’s reputable journals.
참고문헌 (5)
- 황희중, "KODISA 연구윤리의 표절 판단기준과 글로벌 학술지 가이드라인", 유통과학연구, 12(6), pp.15~20 (2014), 한국유통과학회
- "Academic Institution Statistics" (2015)[URL]
- 오세희, "학술지 평가제도 개선 방안", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 12(4), pp.495~509 (2012), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Park, Hun, "The improvement Plan of Tax Law Journals:Focused", Seoul Tax Law Review(STLR), 18(3), pp.740~758 (2012)
- 윤명길, "국제저널 육성 방향과 전망: KODISA Journals를 중심으로", 유통과학연구, 12(6), pp.5~13 (2014), 한국유통과학회