예방적 항생제 사용 양상과 수술부위감염률의 관련성
Association between the Pattern of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use and Surgical Site Infection Rate for Major Surgeries in Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between the pattern of prophylactic antibiotic use (PAU) and the surgical site infection (SSI) rate for major surgeries in Korea. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent cardiac, colon and gastric surgery, hysterectomies and hip/knee replacements at 20 hospitals, and inclusive of over 500 beds. We randomly sampled 60 cases per surgery type for patients discharged between September and November, 2006. A total fo 2,924 cases were included in our analysis. Cox s proportional hazard analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between the pattern of PAU and SSI rate. Results : The proportion of patients who received their first prophylactic antibiotics (PA) 1 hour before incision was 65.5%, who received inappropriate PAs was 80.8%, and the proportion of patients whose PA was discontinued within 24 hours of surgery was 0.5%. The average duration of PAU after surgery was 9 days. The relative risk (RR) of SSI in patients who received their first PA more than 1 hour before incision was significantly higher than for those who received it within 1 hour prior to incision (RR=8.20, 95% CI=4.81-13.99). Inappropriate PA selection increased SSI rate, albeit with marginal significance (RR=1.97, 95% CI=0.96-4.03). Also, prolonged PAU following surgery had no effect on SSI rate. Conclusions : These results suggest that the pattern of PAU in the surgeries examined was not appropriate. Errors in the timing of PAU and of PA selection increase SSI rate. SSI rate remained unaltered following prolonged PAU after surgery.
Abstract
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to analyze the association between the pattern of prophylactic antibiotic use (PAU) and the surgical site infection (SSI) rate for major surgeries in Korea. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent cardiac, colon and gastric surgery, hysterectomies and hip/knee replacements at 20 hospitals, and inclusive of over 500 beds. We randomly sampled 60 cases per surgery type for patients discharged between September and November, 2006. A total fo 2,924 cases were included in our analysis. Cox s proportional hazard analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between the pattern of PAU and SSI rate. Results : The proportion of patients who received their first prophylactic antibiotics (PA) 1 hour before incision was 65.5%, who received inappropriate PAs was 80.8%, and the proportion of patients whose PA was discontinued within 24 hours of surgery was 0.5%. The average duration of PAU after surgery was 9 days. The relative risk (RR) of SSI in patients who received their first PA more than 1 hour before incision was significantly higher than for those who received it within 1 hour prior to incision (RR=8.20, 95% CI=4.81-13.99). Inappropriate PA selection increased SSI rate, albeit with marginal significance (RR=1.97, 95% CI=0.96-4.03). Also, prolonged PAU following surgery had no effect on SSI rate. Conclusions : These results suggest that the pattern of PAU in the surgeries examined was not appropriate. Errors in the timing of PAU and of PA selection increase SSI rate. SSI rate remained unaltered following prolonged PAU after surgery.
참고문헌 (27)
- Kim JM, "1996 national nosocomial infection surveillance in Korea", Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control, 2(2), pp.157~176 (1997)
- Mangram AJ, "Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999", Am J Infect Control, 27(2), pp.97~132 (1999), Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee
- Lee SY, "Risk factor for surgical site infection among patients in ageneral hospital", Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control, 12(1), pp.9~20 (2007)
- Barie PS, "Surgical site infections: Epidemiology and prevention", Surg Infect, 3, pp.S9~21 (2002)
- Oliveira AC, "Postdischarge surveillance: The impact on surgical site infection incidence in a Brazilian university hospital", Am J Infect Control, 32(6), pp.358~361 (2004)
- Bratzler DW, "Use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: Baseline results from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project", Arch Surg, 140(2), pp.174~182 (2005)
- Fry DE, "The surgical infection prevention project: Processes, outcomes, and future impact", Surg Infect, 7(3), pp.S17~26 (2006)
- Park ES, "The economic impacts of surgical site infections", Korean J Nosocomial Infect Control, 10(2), pp.57~64 (2005)
- Zoutma D, "Total and attributable costs of surgical wound infections at a Canadian tertiary-care center", Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 19(4), pp.254~259 (1998)
- Wenzel RP, "Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis", N Engl J Med, 326(5), pp.337~339 (1992)
- Kirkland KB, "The impact of surgical infection in 1990s: Attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs", Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 20(11), pp.725~730 (1999)
- Merle V, "Assessment of prolonged hospital stay attributable to surgical site infection using appropriateness evaluation protocol", Am J Infect Control, 28(2), pp.109~115 (2000)
- Engemann JJ, "Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection", Clin Infect Dis, 36(5), pp.592~598 (2003)
- Khan NA, "Association of postoperative complications with hospital costs and length of stay in a tertiary care center", J Gen Intern Med, 21(2), pp.177~180 (2006)
- Yoshida M, "Technology and the prevention surgical site infections", J Surg Educ, 64(5), pp.302~310 (2007)
- Classen DC, "Timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and risk of surgical wound infection", N Engl J Me, 326(5), pp.281~286 (1992)
- Burke JP, "Maximizing appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical patients: An update from LDS hospital, Salt Lake City", Clin Infect Dis, 33(2), pp.S78~83 (2001)
- Page CP, "Antimi-crobial prophylaxis for surgical wounds", Arch Surg, 128(4), pp.79~88 (1993)
- Fukatsu K, "Influences of type and duration of antimicrobial prophylaxis on an outbreak of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and on the incidence of wound infection", Arch Surg, 132(12), pp.1320~1325 (1997)
- Bratzler DW, "Antimicrobial porphylaxis for surgery: An advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project", Clin Infect Dis, 38(12), pp.1706~1715 (2004)
- Barie PS, "Surgical site infections", Surg Clin North Am, 85(6), pp.1115~1135 (2005)
- Nelson CL, "One day versus seven days of preventive antibiotic therapy in orthopedic surgery", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 176, pp.258~263 (1983)
- Scher KS, "Studies on the duration of antibiotic administration for surgical prophylaxis", Am Surg, 63(1), pp.59~62 (1997)
- Kim CK, "Pilot Study of Surgical Site Infection Prevention" (2006), Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs
- Horan TC, "CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site definitions 1992: A modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections", Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 13(10), pp.606~608 (1992)
- Kanter G, "A system and process redesign to improve perioperative antibiotic administration", Anesth Analg, 103(6), pp.1517~1521 (2006)
- Stone HH, "Antibiotic prophylaxis in gastric, biliary and colonic surgery", Ann Surg, 184(4), pp.443~452 (1976)