본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Charlson 동반질환의 ICD-10 알고리즘 예측력 비교연구

Comparative Study on Three Algorithms of the ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index with Myocardial Infarction Patients

1

조회

0

다운로드

32

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: To compare the performance of three International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision translations of the Charlson comorbidities when predicting in-hospital among patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: MI patients ≥20 years of age with the first admission during 2006 were identified(n=20,280). Charlson comorbidities were drawn from Heath Insurance Claims Data managed by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Korea. Comparisions for various conditions included (a) three algorithms (Halfon, Sundararajan, and Quan algorithms), (b)lookback periods (1-, 3- and 5-years), (c) data range (admission data, admission and ambulatory data), and (d) diagnosis range (primary diagnosis and first secondary diagnoses, all diagnoses). The performance of each procedure was measured with the cstatistic derived from multiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, admission type and Charlson comorbidity index. A bootstrapping procedure was done to determine the approximate 95% confidence interval. Results: Among the 20,280 patients, the mean age was 63.3 years, 67.8% were men and 7.1% died while hospitalized. The Quan and Sundararajan algorithms produced higher prevalences than the Halfon algorithm. The c-statistic of the Quan algorithm was slightly higher, but not significantly different, than that of other two algorithms under all conditions. There was no evidence that on longer lookback periods, additional data, and diagnoses improved the predictive ability. Conclusions: In health services study of MI patients using Health Insurance Claims Data, the present results suggest that the Quan Algorithm using a 1-year lookback involving primary diagnosis and the first secondary diagnosis is adequate in predicting in-hospital mortality.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the performance of three International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision translations of the Charlson comorbidities when predicting in-hospital among patients with myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: MI patients ≥20 years of age with the first admission during 2006 were identified(n=20,280). Charlson comorbidities were drawn from Heath Insurance Claims Data managed by Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service in Korea. Comparisions for various conditions included (a) three algorithms (Halfon, Sundararajan, and Quan algorithms), (b)lookback periods (1-, 3- and 5-years), (c) data range (admission data, admission and ambulatory data), and (d) diagnosis range (primary diagnosis and first secondary diagnoses, all diagnoses). The performance of each procedure was measured with the cstatistic derived from multiple logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, admission type and Charlson comorbidity index. A bootstrapping procedure was done to determine the approximate 95% confidence interval. Results: Among the 20,280 patients, the mean age was 63.3 years, 67.8% were men and 7.1% died while hospitalized. The Quan and Sundararajan algorithms produced higher prevalences than the Halfon algorithm. The c-statistic of the Quan algorithm was slightly higher, but not significantly different, than that of other two algorithms under all conditions. There was no evidence that on longer lookback periods, additional data, and diagnoses improved the predictive ability. Conclusions: In health services study of MI patients using Health Insurance Claims Data, the present results suggest that the Quan Algorithm using a 1-year lookback involving primary diagnosis and the first secondary diagnosis is adequate in predicting in-hospital mortality.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Charlson ME, "A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation", J Chronic Dis, 40(5), pp.373~383 (1987)
  2. Elixhauser A, "Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data", Med Care, 36(1), pp.8~27 (1998)
  3. Zhang JX, "The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims", Med Care, 37(11), pp.1128~1139 (1999)
  4. Preen DB, "Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data", J Clin Epidemiol, 59(9), pp.940~946 (2006)
  5. 김경훈, "건강보험 청구자료에서 동반질환 보정방법과 관찰기간 비교 연구 : 경피적 관상동맥 중재술을 받은 환자를 대상으로", 예방의학회지, 42(4), pp.267~273 (2009), 대한예방의학회
  6. Stukenborg GJ, "Comparison of the performance of two comorbidity measures, with and without information from prior hospitalization", Med Care, 39(7), pp.727~739 (2001)
  7. Schneeweiss S, "Improved comorbidity adjustment for predicting mortality in Medicare populations", Health Serv Res, 38(4), pp.1103~1120 (2003)
  8. Birim O, "Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary nonsmall cell lung cancer", Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 23(1), pp.30~34 (2003)
  9. Birim O, "Charlson comorbidity index as a predictor of long-term outcome after surgery for nonsmall cell lung cancer", Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 28(5), pp.759~762 (2005)
  10. Sundararajan V, "-national comparative performance of three versions of the ICD-10 Charlson index", Med Care, 45(12), pp.1210~1215 (2007)
  11. Deyo RA, "Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases", J Clin Epidemiol, 45(6), pp.613~619 (1992)
  12. Romano PS, "Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectives", J Clin Epidemiol, 46(10), pp.1975~1079 (1993)
  13. D’Hoore W, "Risk adjustment in outcome assessment: The Charlson comorbidity index", Methods Inf Med, 32(5), pp.382~387 (1993)
  14. Halfon P, "Measuring potentially avoidable hospital readmissions", J Clin Epidemiol, 55(6), pp.573~587 (2002)
  15. Sundararajan V, "New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality", J Clin Epidemiol, 57(12), pp.1288~1294 (2004)
  16. Quan H, "Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data", Med Care, 43(11), pp.1130~1139 (2005)
  17. 경민호, "위암환자에서 의무기록과 행정자료를 활용한 Charlson Comorbidity Index의 1년 이내 사망 및 재원일수 예측력 연구", 예방의학회지, 42(2), pp.117~122 (2009), 대한예방의학회
  18. 최원호, "Charlson Comorbidity Index를 활용한 고관절치환술 환자의 건강결과 예측", 병원경영학회지, 14(1), pp.23~35 (2009), 한국병원경영학회
  19. "Seoul University", 2008
  20. "Korea University", 2008
  21. Zhang JX, "The performance of different lookback periods and sources of information for Charlson comorbidity adjustment in Medicare claims", Med Care, 37(11), pp.1128~1139 (1999)
  22. Kim JY, "Development of Risk Adjustment and Prediction Methods for Care Episodes using National Health Insurance Database" (2007), Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)