Cost Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Screening for colorectal cancer is considered cost effective, but is underutilized in the U.S. Information on the efficiency of “tailored interventions” to promote colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings is limited. The paper reports the results of a cost effectiveness analysis that compared a survey-only control group to a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) web-based intervention (screen for life) and to a tailored interactive computer-based intervention. Methods: A randomized controlled trial of people 50 and over, was conducted to test the interventions. The sample was 1224 partcipants 50-70 years of age, recruited from Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, a large multi-specialty clinic in Houston,Texas. Screening status was obtained by medical chart review after a 12-month follow-up period. An “intention to treat”analysis and micro costing from the patient and provider perspectives were used to estimate the costs and effects. Analysis of statistical uncertainty was conducted using nonparametric bootstrapping. Results: The estimated cost of implementing the web-based intervention was $40 per person and the cost of the tailored intervention was $45 per person. The additional cost per person screened for the web-based intervention compared to no intervention was $2602 and the tailored intervention was no more effective than the web-based strategy. Conclusions: The tailored intervention was less cost-effective than the web-based intervention for colorectal cancer screening promotion. The web-based intervention was less cost-effective than previous studies of in-reach colorectal cancer screening promotion. Researchers need to continue developing and evaluating the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening.
Abstract
Objectives: Screening for colorectal cancer is considered cost effective, but is underutilized in the U.S. Information on the efficiency of “tailored interventions” to promote colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings is limited. The paper reports the results of a cost effectiveness analysis that compared a survey-only control group to a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) web-based intervention (screen for life) and to a tailored interactive computer-based intervention. Methods: A randomized controlled trial of people 50 and over, was conducted to test the interventions. The sample was 1224 partcipants 50-70 years of age, recruited from Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, a large multi-specialty clinic in Houston,Texas. Screening status was obtained by medical chart review after a 12-month follow-up period. An “intention to treat”analysis and micro costing from the patient and provider perspectives were used to estimate the costs and effects. Analysis of statistical uncertainty was conducted using nonparametric bootstrapping. Results: The estimated cost of implementing the web-based intervention was $40 per person and the cost of the tailored intervention was $45 per person. The additional cost per person screened for the web-based intervention compared to no intervention was $2602 and the tailored intervention was no more effective than the web-based strategy. Conclusions: The tailored intervention was less cost-effective than the web-based intervention for colorectal cancer screening promotion. The web-based intervention was less cost-effective than previous studies of in-reach colorectal cancer screening promotion. Researchers need to continue developing and evaluating the effectiveness and costeffectiveness of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening.
참고문헌 (30)
- "National Cancer Institute. Colon and rectal cancer" (2011)[URL]
- Seifeldin R, "The economic burden associated with colon cancer in the United States", Clin Ther, 21(8), pp.1370~1379 (1999)
- Smith RA, "American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001-testing for early lung cancer detection", CA Cancer J Clin, 51(1), pp.38~75 (2001)
- Levin B, "Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology", CA Cancer J Clin, 58(3), pp.130~160 (2008)
- "US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer" (2011)[URL]
- "Colorectal cancer screening tests" (2011)[URL]
- "Healthy people 2010 targets"[URL]
- "Transtheoretical model: detailed overview of the transtheoretical model" (2011)[URL]
- Sequist TD, "Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial", Arch Intern Med, 169(4), pp.364~371 (2009)
- Chirikos TN, "Cost-effectiveness of an intervention to increase cancer screening in primary care settings", Prev Med, 39(2), pp.230~238 (2004)
- Lairson DR, "effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use", Cancer, 112(4), pp.779~788 (2008)
- Andersen MR, "Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotion", Cancer, 101(5), pp.1229~1238 (2004)
- Vernon SW, "A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same", Ann Behav Med[DOI]
- Bartholomew LK, "Intervention mapping: a process for developing theory-and evidencebased health education programs", Health Educ Behav, 25(5), pp.545~563 (1998)
- Prochaska JO, "Standardized, individualized, interactive, and personalized self-help programs for smoking cessation", Health Psychol, 12(5), pp.399~405 (1993)
- Velicer WF, "An expert system intervention for smoking cessation", Addict Behav, 18(3), pp.269~290 (1993)
- Lairson DR, "Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 13(5), pp.476~484 (2006)
- "Colorectal (colon) cancer: screen for life print materials" (2011)[URL]
- Andersen MR, "Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities", Health Educ Behav, 29(6), pp.755~770 (2002)
- Drummond MF, "Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Briggs AH, "Pulling costeffectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a nonparametric approach to confidence interval estimation", Health Econ, 6(4), pp.327~340 (1997)
- Briggs A, "Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data", Health Econ, 12(5), pp.377~392 (2003)
- Albada A, "Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: a systematic review", Patient Educ Couns, 77(2), pp.155~171 (2009)
- Myers RE, "A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening", Cancer, 110(9), pp.2083~2091 (2007)
- Ling BS, "Physicians encouraging colorectal screening: a randomized controlled trial of enhanced office and patient management on compliance with colorectal cancer screening", Arch Intern Med, 169(1), pp.47~55 (2009)
- Sequist TD, "Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening", Med Care, 48(6), pp.553~557 (2010)
- Godin G, "Asking questions changes behavior: mere measurement effects on frequency of blood donation", Health Psychol, 27(2), pp.179~184 (2008)
- Sarfaty M, "How to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in practice", CA Cancer J Clin, 57(6), pp.354~366 (2007)
- McQueen A, "Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening", J Gen Intern Med, 24(11), pp.1228~1235 (2009)
- Briggs AH, "O’Brien BJ. The death of cost-minimization analysis", Health Econ, 10(2), pp.179~184 (2001)