Applying Innovative Model and Optimize Business Management for Product Market
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose – Product purpose for optimal values solution for synthesize evaluative criteria and optimize product design values. In addition, product designer has to consider the product design to conform to project, laws and regulations, authentication, from the product design stage. Research design, data, methodology – How to use an evaluative criteria model’s imprecise market data by evaluative criteria research design; product mapping relationships between design parameters and customer requirements using product predicted value method. An evaluative criteria model and their associated criteria status, product evaluative criteria model of results. Results – Therefore, after the enterprise product design project analysis, effectiveness and the customer degree of satisfaction must be appraised to obtain the maximum value for the benefit on behalf of the implementation goals, the promotion product level and market competition strength. Conclusions – In multi criterion decision making (MCDM), using its searching software capacity to obtain the optimal solution.
Abstract
Purpose – Product purpose for optimal values solution for synthesize evaluative criteria and optimize product design values. In addition, product designer has to consider the product design to conform to project, laws and regulations, authentication, from the product design stage. Research design, data, methodology – How to use an evaluative criteria model’s imprecise market data by evaluative criteria research design; product mapping relationships between design parameters and customer requirements using product predicted value method. An evaluative criteria model and their associated criteria status, product evaluative criteria model of results. Results – Therefore, after the enterprise product design project analysis, effectiveness and the customer degree of satisfaction must be appraised to obtain the maximum value for the benefit on behalf of the implementation goals, the promotion product level and market competition strength. Conclusions – In multi criterion decision making (MCDM), using its searching software capacity to obtain the optimal solution.
참고문헌 (11)
- David, A., "Innovation, creativity and governance: Social dynamics of economic performance in city-regions", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 2(10), pp.170~182 (2008)
- Huang, J., "Optimal fuzzy multi-criteria expansion of competence sets using multi-objectives evolutionary algorithms", Expert Systems with Application, 2(30), pp.739~745 (2006)
- John, H., "Csiro: Partnering for the future", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 2(9), pp.146~158 (2007)
- Judith, L., "SECTION 1: Innovation and the food industry volume", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 1(10), pp.2~3 (2008)
- Lee, S., "Inter-technology networks to support innovation strategy : An analysis of Korea’s new growth engines", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 1(12), pp.88~104 (2010)
- Lin, C., "Evaluating vehicle telematics system by using a novel MCDM techniques with dependence and feedback", Expert Systems with Applications, 37(10), pp.6723~6736 (2010)
- Narelle, K., "CSIRO and Australian innovation: a business commentary", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 2(9), pp.203~214 (2007)
- Paul, K., "Lost in translation? Building science and innovation city strategies in Australia and the UK", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 2(10), pp.211~223 (2008)
- Rogers, E., "Diffusions of innovations" (1995), The Free Press
- Stefan, H., "The role of promoters in effecting innovation in higher education institutions", Innovation Management Policy and Practice, 2(12), pp.180~191 (2010)
- Tzeng, G., "Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs : A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL", Expert systems with Applications, 4(32), pp.17~ (2007)