Trade Structure Analysis in the Auto Distribution Industry between Korea and the U.S
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose – To accelerate economic cooperation, this study investigates trade structures of Korea and the United States and identifies trade discrepancies. Such discoveries can lead to increases in trade volume by improving policies, eventually uncovering ways for trade expansion. Research design, data, and methodology – The Index of trade intensity, from trade intensity theory, is used to analyze the trade decision factors. Even though specific factors should materialize in the analysis, realistically, concrete explanations are difficult as there are so many unsolved factors and diversifications. Results – First, the Index of A value/ B value positions Korean against the United States in terms of market share and Korea against world market share, which thereby reveals comparative market intensity. Second, Korea is taking comparative advantage of export specialization. Third, real comparative advantage indices are considerably improved since early 2000. Conclusions - This study uses quantitative measurements and trade intensity theory and trade specialization to come up with a comparative advantage index to see how inter-trade relations between Korea and the United States have changed over the past 10 years.
Abstract
Purpose – To accelerate economic cooperation, this study investigates trade structures of Korea and the United States and identifies trade discrepancies. Such discoveries can lead to increases in trade volume by improving policies, eventually uncovering ways for trade expansion. Research design, data, and methodology – The Index of trade intensity, from trade intensity theory, is used to analyze the trade decision factors. Even though specific factors should materialize in the analysis, realistically, concrete explanations are difficult as there are so many unsolved factors and diversifications. Results – First, the Index of A value/ B value positions Korean against the United States in terms of market share and Korea against world market share, which thereby reveals comparative market intensity. Second, Korea is taking comparative advantage of export specialization. Third, real comparative advantage indices are considerably improved since early 2000. Conclusions - This study uses quantitative measurements and trade intensity theory and trade specialization to come up with a comparative advantage index to see how inter-trade relations between Korea and the United States have changed over the past 10 years.
참고문헌 (23)
- Baik, Chang-Jae, "Diversity for production globalization: comparative analysis for USA-Japan auto industry", Korea Politics Review, 21(1), pp.307~331 (2012)
- Cha, Oon-A, "Comparison between US enterprise and Japanese enterprise for diversification and enterprise accomplishment", Economic Research, 31(4), pp.157~178 (2013)
- Chu, Jung-Gil, "A study on smartwork introduction strategy through USA & Japan’s introduction case", Economics & Business Research, 31(2), pp.1~28 (2013)
- "2014 Annual Export & Import Statistics Reports" (2013)[URL]
- Jeong, Jin-Ho, "Variability transfer and comparative research of interrelation change in Japan-USA stock market", Financial Engineering Research, 11(1), pp.1~16 (2012)
- Joo, Ro-Jong, "International competitive order in 21th century and a study on fair society : focus on USA and Japan", International Region Research, 16(1), pp.123~146 (2012)
- Kang, Jin-Goo., "Empirical study for Japanese subsidiary company working at USA Market", International Management Research, 24(1), pp.24~50 (2013)
- 김진웅, "1945-1948년 남한과 일본에서의 미국의 농지정책 비교", 역사교육논집, (49), pp.387~418 (2012), 역사교육학회
- Kim, Mi-Jeong, "Influence that practical exchange rate affect trade balance for USA and Japan-effect analysis for J-curve", International Region Research, 17(3), pp.285~308 (2013)
- Kim, Yeon-Jeong, "Status & policy analysis of social enterprise : focus on creating the age employment in Japan & USA", Asia Review, 15(3), pp.189~210 (2012)
- Lee, Chang-Je, "From North east Asian Economic Cooperations to East Asian Economic Integration", KIEP Research Review, 11(02), pp.150~157 (2011)
- 이홍배, "한중일 3국간 무역불균형 현상의 구조적 요인분석", 한일경상논집, 37, pp.61~88 (2007), 한일경상학회
- Lee, Hong-Bae, "Production Network Change and Character between Korean and Japanese Industries", Korea-Japan Economy & Commerce Review, 3, pp.25~29 (2012)
- Lim, Cheon-Seok, "Structural Change on East Asian Economy and Ways on Economic Cooperations between Korea and Japan", Korea-Japan Economy & Commerce Review, 14, pp.225~232 (1997)
- Mizuno, Junko, "A study on Korea against Japan trade deficit", Asia Economy Review, 5, pp.45~59 (2010)
- Oh, Dong-Yun, "Analysis on intermediary goods’ manufacturing technology structure and trade dependence relationship between Korea and China", Research on North East Asian Economy, 24(3), pp.85~93 (2012)
- Park. Hae-Sik, "USA Exit Strategy and Japan’s Abenomics, Are there complementary cooperation?", Weekly Financial Brief, 22(30), pp.8~9 (2013)
- Song, Young-Uk, "Influence that Korean Japanese origin image make Chinese consumer’s brand character and purchase intention", Research on Industrial Economy, 22(5), pp.2512~2522 (2009)
- "2012 Annual Statistics Reports" (2012)[URL]
- "2012 Annual Statistics Reports" (2012)[URL]
- Yamazawa, I., "Intensity Analysis of World Trade Flow", Histotsubashi Journal of Economics, 2, pp.212~221 (2010)
- Yoko Uchida, "Vertical Specialization in East Asia: Some Evidence from East Asia Using Asian International Input-Output Tables from 1975 to 2000", Journal of Developing Economies, 7, pp.3~28 (2008)
- 유준, "中國․日本 간 鐵鋼産業의 貿易構造에 관한 硏究", 한일경상논집, 56, pp.111~127 (2012), 한일경상학회