농업분야 소규모 협동조합 유통체계 구축을 위한 우선순위 평가
Evaluating Policy Priorities in Small Agricultural Cooperatives for Distribution Systems
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose – Domestic cooperatives tend to increase during the establishment of cooperatives and gradually through the basic law of social needs. However, only cooperatives’ qualitative grow this secured without blessings, and their quantitative growth through government support is questionable. The purpose of this study is to analyze the agricultural cooperatives established through the Distribution System Cooperatives Basic Law, which was enacted in January 2012. Subsequently, establishing agricultural cooperatives was done briskly. However, cooperatives established rapidly after the founding of the Basic Law encountered problems. Research design, data, and methodology – To assess the performance of selected agricultural cooperatives, data were analyzed using the methodological Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. The AHP is a set of systematic procedures to hierarchically analyze the elements of any problem. Using a survey on expertise, a series of comparative determinations of each pair is performed to evaluate the relative strengths and the strengths of the impact between elements within the hierarchy. A survey was conducted on 10 small agricultural cooperatives using AHP analysis for the examination. The purpose of such research and analysis is to recommend a direction for future policies aimed at small agricultural cooperatives. Result – This study applied three types of policy evaluation criterion, including market expansions, organizations, and cooperative projects, and 12 types of small agricultural cooperative pol-icy measures. Market expansion policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four categories: school meals, direct transactions, shopping malls, and wholesale markets. Organizational policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four types: existing sales channel management, education, preventing free riding, and enlarging members. Cooperative project policies in agricultural cooperatives are classified into four policy areas: cooperation between cooperatives, community contribution, joint businesses, and government links. In this paper, the growth priority in agricultural cooperative policies is analyzed by applying policy evaluation criteria on the basis of a survey on expertise. The priorities of the policy program are also analyzed using a decision analytic hierarchy process. The results indicate that market expansion is the most important policy evaluation criterion therefore, improving direct transactions, school meals, management of existing sales channels, and shopping malls are crucial policy measures. In contrast, the cooperation of cooperatives, expansion of union members, and cooperation with the government were found to have low priority. Conclusions – Agricultural cooperatives should develop plans as follows. Small agricultural cooperatives need to secure school meals and direct transactions for market expansion, restructure marketing strategies to manage existing sales channels, and, finally, increase education and training for sustainable organizational development. This study has the following limitations. Because the subject of the investigation is a new cooperative, determining its sustainable growth is difficult. Therefore, through analysis and a continuous study of cooperatives, future research is expected to show that modifying the direction of agriculture cooperatives is necessary.
Abstract
Purpose – Domestic cooperatives tend to increase during the establishment of cooperatives and gradually through the basic law of social needs. However, only cooperatives’ qualitative grow this secured without blessings, and their quantitative growth through government support is questionable. The purpose of this study is to analyze the agricultural cooperatives established through the Distribution System Cooperatives Basic Law, which was enacted in January 2012. Subsequently, establishing agricultural cooperatives was done briskly. However, cooperatives established rapidly after the founding of the Basic Law encountered problems. Research design, data, and methodology – To assess the performance of selected agricultural cooperatives, data were analyzed using the methodological Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) approach. The AHP is a set of systematic procedures to hierarchically analyze the elements of any problem. Using a survey on expertise, a series of comparative determinations of each pair is performed to evaluate the relative strengths and the strengths of the impact between elements within the hierarchy. A survey was conducted on 10 small agricultural cooperatives using AHP analysis for the examination. The purpose of such research and analysis is to recommend a direction for future policies aimed at small agricultural cooperatives. Result – This study applied three types of policy evaluation criterion, including market expansions, organizations, and cooperative projects, and 12 types of small agricultural cooperative pol-icy measures. Market expansion policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four categories: school meals, direct transactions, shopping malls, and wholesale markets. Organizational policies for agricultural cooperatives are classified into four types: existing sales channel management, education, preventing free riding, and enlarging members. Cooperative project policies in agricultural cooperatives are classified into four policy areas: cooperation between cooperatives, community contribution, joint businesses, and government links. In this paper, the growth priority in agricultural cooperative policies is analyzed by applying policy evaluation criteria on the basis of a survey on expertise. The priorities of the policy program are also analyzed using a decision analytic hierarchy process. The results indicate that market expansion is the most important policy evaluation criterion therefore, improving direct transactions, school meals, management of existing sales channels, and shopping malls are crucial policy measures. In contrast, the cooperation of cooperatives, expansion of union members, and cooperation with the government were found to have low priority. Conclusions – Agricultural cooperatives should develop plans as follows. Small agricultural cooperatives need to secure school meals and direct transactions for market expansion, restructure marketing strategies to manage existing sales channels, and, finally, increase education and training for sustainable organizational development. This study has the following limitations. Because the subject of the investigation is a new cooperative, determining its sustainable growth is difficult. Therefore, through analysis and a continuous study of cooperatives, future research is expected to show that modifying the direction of agriculture cooperatives is necessary.
참고문헌 (15)
- 최경식, "농업분야 신생 협동조합의 현황과 유형별 특징", 농촌지도와 개발, 21(4), pp.967~1006 (2014), 한국농촌지도학회
- 김창환, "산지유통조직의 차이점 분석을 통한 산지조직화 활성화 방안 연구", 유통과학연구, 12(12), pp.65~73 (2014), 한국유통과학회
- 김창환, "친환경·GAP· HACCP이 농업 생산자조직에 미치는 영향", 유통과학연구, 13(6), pp.97~104 (2015), 한국유통과학회
- 김창환, "산지유통조직의 유형별 활성화 조건에 관한 연구", 식품유통연구, 31(4), pp.1~19 (2014), 한국식품유통학회
- 김정섭, "협동조합기본법 시행과 농업법인 관련 법제 개선 방향", 농촌지도와 개발, 21(1), pp.1~34 (2014), 한국농촌지도학회[DOI]
- 김경환, "농산물 도매시장의 물류체계 개선방안에 관한 연구", 농업경영.정책연구, 41(4), pp.837~859 (2014), 한국농식품정책학회
- 김태완, "계층분석과정(AHP)에 의한 지역농업정책의 우선순위 결정 : 창녕지역을 중심으로", 한국국제농업개발학회지, 22(1), pp.8~14 (2010), 한국국제농업개발학회
- 권혁인, "지속가능한 생태계 조성을 위한 국내 협동조합의 주요 특징과 핵심 과제 연구", 한국협동조합연구, 32(3), pp.59~89 (2014), 한국협동조합학회
- 이진홍, "새싹·베이비 채소 생산농가의 판매처 우선순위 설정", 농업경영.정책연구, 35(4), pp.849~870 (2008), 한국농식품정책학회
- 나란희, "AHP법을 이용한 농촌전통테마마을사업의 성과", 농업생명과학연구, 44(4), pp.57~68 (2010), 농업생명과학연구원
- 네모토마사쯔구, "사회적 경제 네트워크를 통한 로컬푸드 운동의 활성화 방안: 한ㆍ일 비교를 중심으로", 지방정부연구, 18(1), pp.57~73 (2014), 한국지방정부학회
- 노재선, "AHP를 이용한 약용작물 산업정책의 우선순위 평가", 농업경영.정책연구, 40(2), pp.491~510 (2013), 한국농식품정책학회
- Satty, T. L., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process" (1980), McGraw-Hill Book Co
- Satty, T. L., "How to make a Decision the Analytic Hierarchy Process", European Journal of Operational Research, 48, pp.9~26 (1990)
- 염찬희, "협동조합적 지역사회의 지속가능 조건 탐색: 캐나다 서스캐처원지역 사례를 통해서", 한국협동조합연구, 32(3), pp.151~177 (2014), 한국협동조합학회
