본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

물류협력지수의 개발 및 측정에 관한 연구: 공동물류사업을 중심으로

A Study on the Development and Measurement of Logistics Partners Cooperation Index(LPCI): Focused on the Joint Logistics

송광석|박종우|Sang-Sok Suh
한국유통과학회 (Korea Distribution Science Association)|2016.06|유통과학연구 (Journal of Distribution Science)|제14권 제6호|pp. 107-118|DOI 10.15722/jds.14.6.201606.107

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Logistics PerformanceJoint Logistics BusinessLogistics Partners Cooperation IndexLPCI.

초록

Purpose – Over 90% of Domestic logistics industry is small enterprise and they are experiencing growth stagnation due to price-based competition structure rather than constructing logistics service of high added value. In order to get over this situation and pursue the development of logistics industry, strengthening its competitiveness, through inter-enterprise cooperative network build-up, would be a key alternative. Therefore, in this study, an index for measuring inter-enterprise cooperation level of Joint logistics business will be developed as a typical collaborative business model in logistics industry. Moreover, a strengthening competitiveness method suggests a developmental step and a key management index to mature in logistics industry. Research Design, Data, Methodology – This study is an index development research for measuring inter-enterprise cooperation level of logistics industry. Such a level was measured by performing a survey by targeting enterprises that participated in Joint logistics business. The targeting enterprises are typical cooperative models in logistics industry. Measurement items were developed which were based on the presented items in existing research. Question items were composed of selection type questions as answering Yes/No. They measures implementation status of corporate activity and detailed activity items measuring qualitative level. Total samples were based on 116 enterprise samples including 90 logistics enterprises and 26 shippers. In addition, by evaluating the importance for Joint logistics business recognition with personnel working level, the weight of measuring variable was extracted. This study has built an assessment tools (LPCI) on Joint logistics business cooperation level in a situation where there are no previous studies on joint logistics business, this study is meaningful for other studies. Results – As a result of analyzing LPCI presented in this study, the score of logistics enterprise was represented as 59.9 points based on full score of 100 points and that of shippers as 47.2 points and cooperation level among enterprises participated in Joint logistics business was revealed to be very low. In particular, as a result of measuring the importance between logistics enterprise and shippers, the difference by each measurement standard was represented among those enterprises. This difference is considered to be a key factor that cooperative operational conformity between logistics enterprises and shippers is represented to be low. Conclusions – As most joint logistics business, being promoted at present, is sharing facility and information with joint logistics business, it is hard to find such a joint logistics business in reality based on cooperative business model in main cooperation agents. Therefore, competitiveness of logistics industry could be strengthened by promoting joint logistics business based on their mutual cooperation among enterprises. In other words, it is to secure sustainable competitiveness of joint logistics business together with creation of new market by inter-enterprise cooperation based on integration of basic logistics business.

Abstract

Purpose – Over 90% of Domestic logistics industry is small enterprise and they are experiencing growth stagnation due to price-based competition structure rather than constructing logistics service of high added value. In order to get over this situation and pursue the development of logistics industry, strengthening its competitiveness, through inter-enterprise cooperative network build-up, would be a key alternative. Therefore, in this study, an index for measuring inter-enterprise cooperation level of Joint logistics business will be developed as a typical collaborative business model in logistics industry. Moreover, a strengthening competitiveness method suggests a developmental step and a key management index to mature in logistics industry. Research Design, Data, Methodology – This study is an index development research for measuring inter-enterprise cooperation level of logistics industry. Such a level was measured by performing a survey by targeting enterprises that participated in Joint logistics business. The targeting enterprises are typical cooperative models in logistics industry. Measurement items were developed which were based on the presented items in existing research. Question items were composed of selection type questions as answering Yes/No. They measures implementation status of corporate activity and detailed activity items measuring qualitative level. Total samples were based on 116 enterprise samples including 90 logistics enterprises and 26 shippers. In addition, by evaluating the importance for Joint logistics business recognition with personnel working level, the weight of measuring variable was extracted. This study has built an assessment tools (LPCI) on Joint logistics business cooperation level in a situation where there are no previous studies on joint logistics business, this study is meaningful for other studies. Results – As a result of analyzing LPCI presented in this study, the score of logistics enterprise was represented as 59.9 points based on full score of 100 points and that of shippers as 47.2 points and cooperation level among enterprises participated in Joint logistics business was revealed to be very low. In particular, as a result of measuring the importance between logistics enterprise and shippers, the difference by each measurement standard was represented among those enterprises. This difference is considered to be a key factor that cooperative operational conformity between logistics enterprises and shippers is represented to be low. Conclusions – As most joint logistics business, being promoted at present, is sharing facility and information with joint logistics business, it is hard to find such a joint logistics business in reality based on cooperative business model in main cooperation agents. Therefore, competitiveness of logistics industry could be strengthened by promoting joint logistics business based on their mutual cooperation among enterprises. In other words, it is to secure sustainable competitiveness of joint logistics business together with creation of new market by inter-enterprise cooperation based on integration of basic logistics business.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. 안영효, "물류네트워크 설계 방법 및 적용 사례에 대한 연구", POSRI경영경제연구, 10(1), pp.61~87 (2010), 포스코경영연구소
  2. Connecting to compete. Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. The Logistics Performance Index and Its indicators, "Arvis, J. F.", The World Bank, ~ (2014)
  3. Averbakh, I., "Parallel NC‐Algorithms for Multi Facility Location Problems with Mutual Communication and their Applications", Networks, 40(1), pp.1~12 (2002)
  4. Bowersox, D. J., "Logistics Paradigms : the Impact of Information Technology", Journal of Business logistics, 16(1), pp.65~76 (1995)
  5. Chen, X., "Joint logistics and financial services by a 3PL firm", European Journal of Operational Research, 214, pp.579~587 (2011)
  6. 정태원, "물류공동화사업 운영성과 지표개발에 관한 실증적 연구", 물류학회지, 17(3), pp.97~118 (2007), 한국물류학회
  7. Damme, D. M. J., "Outsourcing Logistics Management Activities", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), pp.85~94 (1996)
  8. Ellram, L. M., "Partnering Characteristics : A Dyadic Perspective", Journal of Business Logistics, 16(1), pp.41~64 (1995)
  9. Fleischmann, M., "Reverse Logistics Network Structures and Design", Erasmus Research Institute of Management, pp.11~21 (2001)
  10. Fleischmann, M., "Quantitative models for reverse logistics : A Review", European Journal of Operational Research, 103, pp.1~17 (1997)
  11. Frankel, R., "Alliance Formation Motives : A Comparison of International Perspectives", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 7(2), pp.19~32 (1996)
  12. 한승철, "AHP를 이용한 제주지역 중소기업 물류공동화사업 활성화를 위한 우선순위분석 연구", 물류학회지, 19(3), pp.77~107 (2009), 한국물류학회
  13. 한승철, "물류전략이 파트너십, 물류공동화, 물류성과에 미치는 영향: 제주지역 중소기업을 중심으로", 물류학회지, 21(1), pp.203~228 (2011), 한국물류학회
  14. 한용호, "비즈니스 프로세스 관리 시스템을 기반으로 한 CPFR의 구현", 정보시스템연구, 17(4), pp.321~340 (2008), 한국정보시스템학회
  15. 한용호, "역물류 네트워크 모델의 최적화를 위한 협력적 공진화 알고리즘", 경영과학, 27(3), pp.15~31 (2010), 한국경영과학회
  16. 홍명호, "균형성과표와 분석 네트워크 프로세스를 기반으로 한 공동물류센터의 물류서비스 성과측정 모형 개발", 물류학회지, 16(4), pp.5~42 (2006), 한국물류학회
  17. 홍명호, "공동물류센터의 생산성 평가모형에 관한 연구- 수도권 및 부산권 내륙화물기지(복합화물터미널 및 ICD)를 중심으로 -", 물류학회지, 16(4), pp.79~101 (2006), 한국물류학회
  18. Ji, S. J., "A Study on the Factors Influencing Jointed Logistics", Korean Journal of Logistics, 9(2), pp.1~14 (2001)
  19. Jim Wu, Y. C., "Assessment of Technological Innovations in Patenting for 3rd Party Logistics Providers", Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19(5), pp.504~524 (2006)
  20. 전준수, "물류기업 중심의 기업 간 협력네트워크가 정보공유 및 관계만족에 미치는 영향", 무역학회지, 32(3), pp.221~245 (2007), 한국무역학회
  21. 정영훈, "역물류 환경을 고려한 복수차고지 다용량 차량경로문제", 경영과학, 29(1), pp.89~99 (2012), 한국경영과학회
  22. SCM Report, "KCCI.", KCCI, ~ (2012)
  23. 김광석, "물류공동화 활성화를 위한 중요요인과 장애요인에 관한 연구 - 인천남동공단 물류공동화를 중심으로 -", 물류학회지, 19(1), pp.5~34 (2009), 한국물류학회
  24. 김영일, "자동차부품업계의 물류공동화에 관한 연구 -대구경북지역 기업을 중심으로", 물류학회지, 20(3), pp.229~251 (2010), 한국물류학회
  25. 김영민, "물류기기 공동이용사업의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 14(3), pp.191~215 (2004), 한국물류학회
  26. 김영민, "농산물 물류기기 공동이용사업의 문제점과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 14(2), pp.119~140 (2004), 한국물류학회
  27. Ko, H. J., "A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward", reverse logistics network for 3PLs, 2007, pp.34(2), 346~366
  28. Ko, H. J., "A Genetic Algorithm Approach for Logistics Network Integrating Forward and Reverse Flows", IE Interfaces, 17, pp.141~151 (2004)
  29. Joint Logistics and target Industry, "KOTI", KOTI, ~ (2013)
  30. Joint Logistics and target Industry, "KOTI", KOTI, ~ (2013)
  31. KSA, "KNQA Management System", KSA Media, ~ (2008)
  32. 권오철, "물류정보화 수준이 물류성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 유통과학연구, 5(1), pp.57~74 (2007), 한국유통과학회[DOI]
  33. Lambert, D. M., "Strategic Logistics Management" (1993), Irwin
  34. Laporte, G., "An exact algorithm for minimizing routing and operating costs in depot location", European Journal of Operational Research, 6(2), pp.224~226 (1981)
  35. Laporte, G., "Models and exact Solutions for a Class of Stochastic Location-Routing Problems", European Journal of Operational Research, 39(1), pp.71~78 (1989)
  36. Lee, B., "CPFR : Strategic Collaboration Aimed on Minimizing the Demand and Supply Discrepancy", Samsung SDS Journal of IT Services, 4(2), pp.184~199 (2007)
  37. 이도현, "국내 유통기업의 CPFR 적용 사례연구", 한국SCM학회지, 6(1), pp.37~48 (2006), 한국SCM학회
  38. Lee, H. S., "SPSS 16.0 Manual" (2010), Bobmunsa
  39. 이효진, "국가산업단지 물류공동화 전략에 관한 연구", 박사, 경영학, pp.2003
  40. 이재원, "중국 중심의 동북아 6개국 무역물류 공동화 전략 수립에 관한 연구", 해운물류연구, 27(2), pp.265~286 (2011), 한국해운물류학회
  41. 이수일, "우리나라 도료산업의 공동물류합리화에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 18(1), pp.179~199 (2008), 한국물류학회
  42. 이영찬, "중소유통업의 물류공동화에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 13(1), pp.123~144 (2003), 한국물류학회
  43. Ok, S. J., "A Reference to the Efficiency of Logistic Standardization Policy", Korea Logistics Review, 10(1), pp.177~195 (2000)
  44. 박정수, "화주기업과 물류기업의 공동 핵심성과지표 관리방법에 대한 연구", 유통경영학회지, 13(1), pp.69~89 (2010), 한국유통경영학회[DOI]
  45. Park, M. S., "A Study on the Public Warehousing in Manufacturing Companies", Korean Management Review, 29(1), pp.1~18 (2000)
  46. 박수명, "공동물류센터의 생산성 평가모형에 관한 연구 - 수도권 및 부산권 내륙화물기지(복합화물터미널 및 ICD)를 중심으로-", 물류학회지, 18(1), pp.55~83 (2008), 한국물류학회
  47. 박원근, "DEA모델을 이용한 공동물류센터 이용업체의 효율성분석 : 수도권을 중심으로", 유통경영학회지, 16(1), pp.79~87 (2013), 한국유통경영학회[DOI]
  48. Pittiglio, Rabin, "Supply-Chain Operation Reference Model(SCOR) : The First Cross-Industry Framework for Integrated Supply-Chain Management", Logistics Information Management, 10(2), pp.62~67 (1994)
  49. Tuzun, D., "A Two-Phase Tabu search Approach to the location Routing Problem", European journal of Operational Research, 116(1), pp.87~99 (1999)
  50. Wisner, J. D., "Principles of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach" (2012), South Western Cengage Learning
  51. 윤명길, "A Study on Joint Logistics of Local Pharmaceutical Wholesale Businesses", 물류학회지, 18(3), pp.111~140 (2008), 한국물류학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

Trends in the Home Meal Replacement MarketJong-Woo Choi, Seong-Jin Park, Ernest Baskin, Seong-Yoon Heopp. 5-15The Effect of Store Selection Attributes and Consumption Emotion on Revisit Intention to Traditional Market under Retail Regulation정락채, 박종호pp. 17-26A Study on the Improvement Plan of Business District Information System송하령, 김영기, 김승희pp. 27-37Competition of Islamic Bank in IndonesiaHardius Usman, Syafaqatul Humairohpp. 39-44브랜드농산물에 대한 소비자인식 및 만족도 연구김민균, 김판진, 정기영pp. 45-52
원문 보기