본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성장기 II급 부정교합자에서 골격 형태에 따른 액티베이터 사용 효과에 관한 연구

Effects of activator treatment on different skeletal patterns in growing class II malocclusion patients

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

본 연구는 성장기 II급 부정교합자를 골격 형태에 따라 분류하여 액티베이터 사용 효과를 비교, 분석하고 그 결과를 진단, 치료 계획 수립 등 임상 과정에 연계시키기 위해 시행되었다. 실험은 수완부 방사선 사진상 Fishman 분류의 2, 3, 4 단계로 최대성장기 이전의 II급 부정교합자를 대상으로 하였다. 대조군은 ANB 3도 이상이며 악정형 장치 치료를 받지 않고 치열교정 치료만 받은 환자로 총 25명(남자 15명, 여자 10명)이고 실험군은 액티베이터 치료를 받은 환자로 총 116명(남자 53명, 여자 63명)이었다. Articular angle과 gonial angle을 이용하여 골격 형태를 hyperdivergent type과 hypodivergent type으로 분류하여 액티베이터 치료효과를 비교한 결과 hypodivergent한 골격 형태를 가진 환자에서 더 큰 효과를 보였다. 따라서 성장기 II급 부정교합자의 진단과 치료계획 수립 시 안모의 골격 형태 분류를 통해 액티베이터의 효과를 예측할 수 있다고 생각한다. (대치교정지 2007;37(1):29-43)

Abstract

Objective: To establish proper diagnosis and treatment plan for skeletal Class II malocclusions, some important factors to consider are the patient's skeletal morphology, prognosis as well as the treatment effects. Therefore, the present study analyzed the effects of activator treatment on different skeletal patterns in growing Class II malocclusion patients. Methods: A total of 116 patients (53 boys & 63 girls) in the experimental group were treated with the activator appliance. The experimental group was classified into either hyperdivergent or hypodivergent groups according to articular and gonial angles. Results: Patients with hypodivergent growth patterns showed good effects of activator treatment. Conclusion: It seems conceivable that through classifying adolescent Class II malocclusion patients into different skeletal patterns, activator treatment effects may be predicted during the diagnosis and treatment planning stage. (원 저 대치교정지 2006;36(3):178-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Korean J Orthod 2007;37(1):29-43)

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Craig CE, "The skeletal patterns characteristic of Class I and Class II Division I malocclusion in normal lateralis", pp.44~56
  2. Bishara SE, "Mandibular changes in persons with untreated and treated Class II division 1 malocclusion", 113, pp.661~673 (1998)
  3. You ZH, "Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated Class II persons", 120, pp.598~607 (2001)
  4. Rothstein T, "Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of females and males with Class II Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14(revisited). Part II. Anteroposterior and vertical circumpubertal growth", 120, pp.542~555 (2001)
  5. Bjork A, "Facial growth in man studied with the aid of metallic implants", pp.9~34
  6. Perillo L, "Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions", 109, pp.132~139 (1996)
  7. Terp S, "A laminagraphic study of the alterations of the temporo-mandibular joint following activator treatment", pp.257~66
  8. "A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment", pp.125~34
  9. Arena SA, "A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire", pp.269~76
  10. Angle Orthod 1964, "Vertical growth versus anteroposterior growth as related to function and treatment", pp.75~93
  11. Isaacson JR, "Extreme variation in vertical facial growth and associated variation in skeletal and dental relations", pp.219~29
  12. "Vertical proportions and the palatal plane in anterior open-bite", pp.273~82
  13. Lee HK, "A Roentgenocephalometric study of craniofacial characteristics of the skeletal class III malocclusions classified by mandibular plane", pp.205~227
  14. You ZH, "Dentoalveolar changes related to mandibular forward growth in untreated Class II persons", 120, pp.598~607 (2001)
  15. Tanguay R, "A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth description and comparison of adolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malscclusion", pp.437~42
  16. McNamara JA Jr, "Long-term mandibular adaptations to protrusive function an experimental study in Macaca mulatta", pp.98~108
  17. Forsberg CM, "Skeletal and soft tissue response to activator treatment", pp.247~53
  18. "Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions", ep, pp.242~51
  19. McDowell F, "The Frankel appliance- avoidance of lower incisor proclination", pp.3~4
  20. Angle Orthod 1983, "Treatment effects of Frankel Effects of activator treatment on different skeletal patterns in growing class II malocclusion patientsJun-Hun Kim To establish proper diagnosis and treatment plan for skeletal Class II malocclusions some important factors to consider are the patient's skeletal morphology prognosis as well as the treatment effects the present study analyzed the effects of activator treatment on different skeletal patterns in gro", pp.107~21

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)