Effects of conventional and modified facemask therapies on dentofacial structures
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the dentofacial effects of conventional and modified facemask therapies with rapid maxillary expansion, in a group of Class III patients; and compared with an untreated control group. Methods: The conventional facemask group (Group 1) comprised of 24 patients, 13 girls and 11 boys (mean age, 9.2 ± 1.4 years); the modified facemask treatment group (Group 2) comprised of 24 patients, 12 girls and 12 boys (mean age, 9.3 ± 1.6 years); and the control group (Group 3) comprised of 21 subjects, 11 girls and 10 boys (mean age, 9.8 ± 1.9 years). Treatment and control changes within the groups and the differences between the groups were analyzed statistically. Intra-group comparisons were evaluated using the non-parametric Wilcoxon's test and intergroup changes were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The statistical significance of intergroup differences was further assessed with the Mann-Whitney test for independent samples and applying Bonferroni's correction (p ＜ 0.016). Results: In group 1, SNB changes were less than the control. There were increases in SNA, ANB, SN-MP, A to N perp and Upper lip to E plane. In group 2, SNB, U1-NA (mm) U1-NA (o) and Pog to N perp (mm) changes were less than the control. There were increases in SNA, ANB, SN-MP, A to N perp and Upper lip to E plane. Conclusions: Modified facemask appliance can be used effectively in Class III patients with a retrognathic maxilla. Facemask therapies with expansion resulted in an anterior advancement and translation of maxilla without rotation; and the mandible moved downward and backward in both treatment groups. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(6):432-443)
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the dentofacial effects of conventional and modified facemask therapies with rapid maxillary expansion, in a group of Class III patients; and compared with an untreated control group. Methods: The conventional facemask group (Group 1) comprised of 24 patients, 13 girls and 11 boys (mean age, 9.2 ± 1.4 years); the modified facemask treatment group (Group 2) comprised of 24 patients, 12 girls and 12 boys (mean age, 9.3 ± 1.6 years); and the control group (Group 3) comprised of 21 subjects, 11 girls and 10 boys (mean age, 9.8 ± 1.9 years). Treatment and control changes within the groups and the differences between the groups were analyzed statistically. Intra-group comparisons were evaluated using the non-parametric Wilcoxon's test and intergroup changes were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The statistical significance of intergroup differences was further assessed with the Mann-Whitney test for independent samples and applying Bonferroni's correction (p ＜ 0.016). Results: In group 1, SNB changes were less than the control. There were increases in SNA, ANB, SN-MP, A to N perp and Upper lip to E plane. In group 2, SNB, U1-NA (mm) U1-NA (o) and Pog to N perp (mm) changes were less than the control. There were increases in SNA, ANB, SN-MP, A to N perp and Upper lip to E plane. Conclusions: Modified facemask appliance can be used effectively in Class III patients with a retrognathic maxilla. Facemask therapies with expansion resulted in an anterior advancement and translation of maxilla without rotation; and the mandible moved downward and backward in both treatment groups. (Korean J Orthod 2010;40(6):432-443)
참고문헌 (30)
- Ngan P, "Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 109, pp.38~49 (1996)
- Guyer EC, "Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents", Angle Orthod, 56, pp.7~30 (1986)
- Ellis E 3rd, "Components of adult Class III malocclusion", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 42, pp.295~305 (1984)
- Jackson GW, "Experimental and postexperimental response to anteriorly directed extraoral force in young Macaca nemestrina", Am J Orthod, 75, pp.318~33 (1979)
- Kambara T, "Dentofacial changes produced by extraoral forward force in the Macaca irus", Am J Orthod, 71, pp.249~77 (1977)
- Keles A, "Effect of varying the force direction on maxillary orthopedic protraction", Angle Orthod, 72, pp.387~96 (2002)
- Mermigos J, "Protraction of the maxillofacial complex", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98, pp.47~55 (1990)
- McNamara JA Jr, "Orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in the mixed dentition", pp.285~93 (1993), Needham Press
- Hickham JH, "Maxillary protraction therapy: diagnosis and treatment", J Clin Orthod, 25, pp.102~13 (1991)
- Ishii H, "Treatment effect of combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in severe skeletal Class III cases", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 92, pp.304~12 (1987)
- Hata S, "Biomechanical effects of maxillary protraction on the craniofacial complex", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 91, pp.305~11 (1987)
- Nanda R, "Biomechanical and clinical considerations of a modified protraction headgear", Am J Orthod, 78, pp.125~39 (1980)
- Alcan T, "The effects of a modified protraction headgear on maxilla", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 117, pp.27~38 (2000)
- Göyenç Y, "The effect of a modified reverse headgear force applied with a facebow on the dentofacial structures", Eur J Orthod, 26, pp.51~7 (2004)
- Petit H, "Adaptations following accelerated facial mask therapy. In Clinical alteration of the growing face. Monograph no. 14, Craniofacial growth series", Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 48~59 (1983)
- Erbay EF, "Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tissue analyses", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121, pp.57~64 (2002)
- Swlerenga D, "Cephalometric values for adult Mexican-Americans", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106, pp.146~55 (1994)
- Takada K, "Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal", Eur J Orthod, 15, pp.211~21 (1993)
- Kapust AJ, "Cephalometric effects of face mask", expansion therapy in Class III children: a comparison of three age groups, 1998, pp.113, 204~12
- Kajiyama K, "Comparison of orthodontic and orthopedic effects of a modified maxillary protractor between deciduous and early mixed dentitions", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, pp.23~32 (2004)
- Baccetti T, "Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118, pp.404~13 (2000)
- Baik HS, "Clinical results of the maxillary protraction in Korean children", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 108, pp.583~92 (1955)
- Yüksel S, "Early and late facemask therapy", Eur J Orthod, 23, pp.559~68 (2001)
- Merwin D, "Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112, pp.292~9 (1997)
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.456~9 (1993), Mosby
- Haas AJ, "The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the midpalatal suture", Angle Orthod, 35, pp.200~17 (1965)
- Kiliçoglu H, "Profile changes in patients with class III malocclusions after Delaire mask therapy", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113, pp.453~62 (1998)
- Battagel JM, "Class III malocclusion: the post-retention findings following a non-extraction treatment approach", Eur J Orthod, 15, pp.45~55 (1993)
- Macdonald KE, "Cephalometric changes after the correction of class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion", facemask therapy, 1999, pp.116, 13~24
- Ngan P, "Stickel B. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion", Quintessence Int, 23, pp.197~207 (1992)