본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of postoperative changes in the distal and proximal segments between conventional and sliding mini-plate fixation following mandibular setback

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative three-dimensional (3D) changes in the proximal segments after mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy and to compare the changes between the conventional mini-plate fixation and semi-rigid sliding plate fixation. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were used to evaluate the postoperative 3D changes in the proximal segments during the healing process. CBCT images were superimposed using the symphysis and the lower anterior mandible as references. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the conventional mini-plate and semi-rigid sliding plate groups (p > 0.05). With respect to the distribution of changes greater than 2 mm in the landmarks, the right condylion, right coronoid process, and left condylion showed ratios of 55.6%, 50.0%, and 44.4%, respectively, in the semi-rigid sliding plate group; however, none of the landmarks showed ratios greater than 30% in the conventional mini-plate group. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative changes in the segments between the conventional mini-plate and semi-rigid sliding plate groups. Nevertheless, while selecting the type of fixation technique, clinicians should consider that landmarks with greater than 2 mm changes were higher in the semi-rigid sliding plate group than in the conventional mini-plate group. [Korean J Orthod 2016;46(6):372-378]

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the postoperative three-dimensional (3D) changes in the proximal segments after mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy and to compare the changes between the conventional mini-plate fixation and semi-rigid sliding plate fixation. Methods: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were used to evaluate the postoperative 3D changes in the proximal segments during the healing process. CBCT images were superimposed using the symphysis and the lower anterior mandible as references. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the conventional mini-plate and semi-rigid sliding plate groups (p > 0.05). With respect to the distribution of changes greater than 2 mm in the landmarks, the right condylion, right coronoid process, and left condylion showed ratios of 55.6%, 50.0%, and 44.4%, respectively, in the semi-rigid sliding plate group; however, none of the landmarks showed ratios greater than 30% in the conventional mini-plate group. Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative changes in the segments between the conventional mini-plate and semi-rigid sliding plate groups. Nevertheless, while selecting the type of fixation technique, clinicians should consider that landmarks with greater than 2 mm changes were higher in the semi-rigid sliding plate group than in the conventional mini-plate group. [Korean J Orthod 2016;46(6):372-378]

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Dolce C, "Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 58, pp.1219~1227 (2000)
  2. Mobarak KA, "Long-term stability of mandibular setback surgery:a follow-up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 15, pp.83~95 (2000)
  3. Costa F, "Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 16, pp.179~192 (2001)
  4. Kim MJ, "Positional stability following intentional posterior ostectomy of the distal segment in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 30, pp.35~40 (2002)
  5. Borstlap WA, "Stabilisation of sagittal split advancement osteotomies with miniplates: a prospective, multicentre study with two-year follow-up. Part III--condylar remodelling and resorption", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 33, pp.649~655 (2004)
  6. Politi M, "Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures:rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 62, pp.169~181 (2004)
  7. Chang-Hoon Rhee, "Correlation between skeletal and dental changes after mandibular setback surgery-first orthodontic treatment: Cone-beam computed tomography-generated half-cephalograms", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(2), pp.59~65 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
  8. Proffit WR, "Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 6, pp.7~18 (1991)
  9. Joss CU, "Stability after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy setback surgery with rigid internal fixation: a systematic review", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 66, pp.1634~1643 (2008)
  10. Wolford LM, "Concomitant temporomandibular joint and orthognathic surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61, pp.1198~1204 (2003)
  11. 손시은, "Miniscrews versus surgical archwires for intermaxillary fixation in adults after orthognathic surgery", 대한치과교정학회지, 45(1), pp.3~12 (2015), 대한치과교정학회
  12. Law JH, "Stability following combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies treated with rigid internal fixation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 47, pp.128~136 (1989)
  13. Stroster TG, "Assessment of condylar position following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with wire fixation or rigid fixation", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 9, pp.55~63 (1994)
  14. Kim YI, "Evaluation of intersegmental displacement according to osteosynthesis method for mandibular setback sagittal split ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomographic superimposition", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.2893~2898 (2012)
  15. Mavili ME, "Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages", Ann Plast Surg, 63, pp.396~403 (2009)
  16. Baek RM, "A new condyle repositionable plate for sagittal split ramus osteotomy", J Craniofac Surg, 21, pp.489~490 (2010)
  17. Proffit WR, "Stability after mandibular setback: mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 70, pp.e408~e414 (2012)
  18. Korkmaz HH, "Evaluation of different miniplates in fixation of fractured human mandible with the finite element method", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 103, pp.e1~e13 (2007)
  19. Tams J, "A three-dimensional study of bending and torsion moments for different fracture sites in the mandible: an in vitro study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 26, pp.383~388 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

골격성 3급 부정교합 환자에서 하악지시상분할골절단술 후 3D CT 영상을 이용한 하악과두 위치변화 분석국민석, 김방신, 박영준, 박홍주, 오희균, 유민기, 유선열, 장정록, 최근호대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2009 · 제35권 제5호Correlation between skeletal and dental changes after mandibular setback surgery-first orthodontic treatment: Cone-beam computed tomography-generated half-cephalograms김성식, 김용일, 박수병, 손우성, 최윤경, Chang-Hoon Rhee대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2015 · 제45권 제2호Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of the condylar remodeling occurring after mandibular set-back by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy and rigid fixation김성식, 김용일, 박수병, 손우성, Man-Hee Ha대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2013 · 제43권 제6호Effect of perioperative buccal fracture of the proximal segment on postoperative stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy양훈주, 이상윤, 한정준, 황순정대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2013 · 제39권 제5호Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular width after mandibular asymmetric setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomySeong-Sik Kim, Soo-Byung Park, Sung-Hun Kim, Yong-Il Kim대한치과교정학회 · 대한치과교정학회지2023 · 제53권 제2호Early removal of mini-plate for correction of condyle position in patient of orthognathic surgery김수관, 김원기, 박현춘, 신보수, 오지수, 유재식, 임형섭치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2016 · 제40권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)