국내 예방의학 분야의 공저자 · 핵심어 네트워크와 군집 양상-대한예방의학회지(1991~2006) 게재논문의 분석-
Co-author and Keyword Network and their Clustering Appearance in Preventive Medicine Fields in Korea: Analysis of Papers in the Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 1991~2006
2
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : This study evaluated knowledge structure and its effect factor by analysis of co-author and keyword networks in Korea’s preventive medicine sector. Methods : The data was extracted from 873 papers listed in the Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, and was transformed into a co-author and keyword matrix where the existence of a ‘link’ was judged by impact factors calculated by the weight value of the role and rate of author participation. Research achievement was dependent upon the author's status and networking index, as analyzed by neighborhood degree, multidimensional scaling, correspondence analysis, and multiple regression. Results : Co-author networks developed as randomness network in the center of a few high-productivity researchers. In particular, closeness centrality was more developed than degree centrality. Also, power law distribution was discovered in impact factor and research productivity by college affiliation. In multiple regression, the effect of the author’s role was significant in both the impact factor calculated by the participatory rate and the number of listed articles. However, the number of listed articles varied by sex. Conclusions : This study shows that the small world phenomenon exists in co-author and keyword networks in a journal, as in citation networks. However, the differentiation of knowledge structure in the field of preventive medicine was relatively restricted by specialization.
Abstract
Objectives : This study evaluated knowledge structure and its effect factor by analysis of co-author and keyword networks in Korea’s preventive medicine sector. Methods : The data was extracted from 873 papers listed in the Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, and was transformed into a co-author and keyword matrix where the existence of a ‘link’ was judged by impact factors calculated by the weight value of the role and rate of author participation. Research achievement was dependent upon the author's status and networking index, as analyzed by neighborhood degree, multidimensional scaling, correspondence analysis, and multiple regression. Results : Co-author networks developed as randomness network in the center of a few high-productivity researchers. In particular, closeness centrality was more developed than degree centrality. Also, power law distribution was discovered in impact factor and research productivity by college affiliation. In multiple regression, the effect of the author’s role was significant in both the impact factor calculated by the participatory rate and the number of listed articles. However, the number of listed articles varied by sex. Conclusions : This study shows that the small world phenomenon exists in co-author and keyword networks in a journal, as in citation networks. However, the differentiation of knowledge structure in the field of preventive medicine was relatively restricted by specialization.
참고문헌 (38)
- Bloor, D., "Knowledge and Social Imagery", pp.1~15 (1973), University of Chicago Press
- Milgram, S., "The small world problem", Psychol Today, 1(1), pp.61~67 (1967)
- Travers, J., "An Experimental study of the small world problem", Sociometry, 32(4), pp.425~443 (1969)
- Watts, D.J., "Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks", Nature, 393(6684), pp.440~442 (1998)
- Buchanan, M., "Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks", pp.235~ (2002), W. W. Norton & Company
- Erdös, P., "On the evolution of random graphs", Publ Math Inst Hung Acad Sci, 5, pp.17~61 (1960)
- Erdös, P., "On the strength of connectedness of a random graph", Publ Math Inst Hung Acad Sci, 12(1-2), pp.261~267 (1961)
- Merton, R.K., "The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations", pp.267~412 (1973), University of Chicago Press
- Collins, H., "The seven sex: A study in the sociology of a phenonmenon, or the replication of experiments in physics", Sociology, 9(2), pp.205~224 (1975)
- Garfield, E., "Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation", Science, 178(4060), pp.471~479 (1972)
- Garfield, E., "Of nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors", Theor Med, 13(2), pp.117~135 (1992)
- Yoon, B., "A text-mining-based patent network: Analytical tool for high-technology trend", J High Technol Manage Res, 15(1), pp.37~50 (2004)
- Li, M., "Weighted networks of scientific communication: The measurement and topological role of weight", Physica A, 350(2-4), pp.643~656 (2005)
- Malin, B., "A longitudinal social network analysis of the editorial boards of medical informatics and bioinformatics journals", J Am Med Inform Assoc, 14(3), pp.340~348 (2007)
- Lee CS, "A scientometric study of SCI impact factors of major Korean medical journals:1991-1999", Korea Soc Inf Manage, 18(1), pp.85~104 (2001)
- Glänzel, W., "Coauthorship patterns and trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications of database indexing and search strategies", Libr Trends, 50(3), pp.461~473 (2002)
- Yoo, Y.J., (2003), Korea: Yonsei Univ
- Cole, J., "Social Stratification in Science", pp.33~ (1973), University of Chicago Press
- Lindsey, D., "Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: The problem of multiple authorship", Soc Stud Sci, 10(2), pp.145~162 (1980)
- Bremholm, T.L., "Author productivity and citation frequency in the proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science", Proc Okla Acad Sci, 84, pp.53~66 (2004)
- Merton, R.K., "mattew effect in science", Science, 159(3810), pp.56~63 (1968)
- Barabasi, A.L., "The New Science of Networks", pp.41~92 (2002), Perseus
- Barnes, B., "Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis", pp.1~119 (1996), Athlone
- Wasserman, S., "Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications", pp.167~214 (1994), Cambridge University Press
- McDowell, J.M., "The determinants of coauthorship: An analysis of the economics literature", Rev Econ Stat, 65(1), pp.155~160 (1983)
- Lee, H.J., (2003), Yonsei Univ
- Lotka, A.J., "The frequency distribution of scientific productivity", J Wash Acad Sci, 16(12), pp.317~323 (1926)
- MacRoberts, M.H., "A Reevaluation of Lotka’s Law of scientific productivity", Soc Studies Sci, 12(3), pp.443~450 (1982)
- Sen, B.K., "Comments on measurement of organizational scientific productivity", Current Sci, 91(10), pp.1306~1307 (2006)
- Zipf, G.K., "Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology" (1965), Hafner Pub
- Price, D.J., "Networks of scientific papers", Science, 149(3683), pp.510~515 (1965)
- Huberman, B.A., "Growth dynamics of the world-wide web", Nature, 401(6749), pp.131~ (1999)
- Albert, R., "Diameter of the world-wide web", Nature, 401(6749), pp.130~ (1999)
- Barabasi, A.L., "Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations", Physica A, 311(3-4), pp.590~614 (2002)
- Newman, M.E.J., "Scientific collaboration networks: Ic%network construction and fundamental result", Phys Rev E, 64(1), pp.16~131 (2001)
- Newman, M.E.J., "Scientific collaboration networks: IIc%shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality", Phys Rev E, 64(1), pp.16~132 (2001)
- 김준연, "예방의학의 발전방향", 예방의학회지, 39(3), pp.185~189 (2006), 대한예방의학회
- 임현술, "예방의학의 발전을 위한 학술활동", 예방의학회지, 39(2), pp.105~109 (2006), 대한예방의학회