본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Part I. What drives Korean adults to seek orthodontic treatment: Reliability and validity of a measurement instrument for the perception of orthodontic treatment

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: To develop a standardized instrument to measure the level of cognition for orthodontic treatment in adults, and verify its reliability and validity for assessing perceptions of orthodontic treatment in adults. Methods: A total of 406 adults aged 19–64 years were surveyed by an internet research system. A tool was developed through the instrument development and verification stages. The data were analyzed by correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach’s α test. Results: The instrument consisted of 11 items covering four factors related to orthodontic treatment. Three items were related to general perception, four described the perception of the treatment for adults, two related to the treatment effects, and two related to the retention of orthodontic treatment. In the reliability test, Cronbach’s α was 0.845 for the 11 items. In assessments for individual components, Cronbach’s α was 0.764 for the general perception of orthodontic treatment, 0.705 for the perception of this treatment for adults, 0.707 for the effects of the treatment, and 0.701 for the retention of orthodontic treatment. Finally, a measurement instrument for the perception of orthodontic treatment in adults was designed to assess the 11 items on a four-point Likert scale. Conclusions: This study developed a standard measurement instrument for assessing the perception of orthodontic treatment in adults. The proposed instrument will enable additional studies on the influence of an adult’s perception of orthodontic treatment on the decision to undergo treatment.

Abstract

Objective: To develop a standardized instrument to measure the level of cognition for orthodontic treatment in adults, and verify its reliability and validity for assessing perceptions of orthodontic treatment in adults. Methods: A total of 406 adults aged 19–64 years were surveyed by an internet research system. A tool was developed through the instrument development and verification stages. The data were analyzed by correlation analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach’s α test. Results: The instrument consisted of 11 items covering four factors related to orthodontic treatment. Three items were related to general perception, four described the perception of the treatment for adults, two related to the treatment effects, and two related to the retention of orthodontic treatment. In the reliability test, Cronbach’s α was 0.845 for the 11 items. In assessments for individual components, Cronbach’s α was 0.764 for the general perception of orthodontic treatment, 0.705 for the perception of this treatment for adults, 0.707 for the effects of the treatment, and 0.701 for the retention of orthodontic treatment. Finally, a measurement instrument for the perception of orthodontic treatment in adults was designed to assess the 11 items on a four-point Likert scale. Conclusions: This study developed a standard measurement instrument for assessing the perception of orthodontic treatment in adults. The proposed instrument will enable additional studies on the influence of an adult’s perception of orthodontic treatment on the decision to undergo treatment.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. 김윤지, "Study on the perception of orthodontic treatment according to age: A questionnaire survey", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(4), pp.215~221 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
  2. 이신재, "성인교정환자의 내외통제소재와치료협조도에 대한 연구", 대한치과교정학회지, 32(2), pp.71~78 (2002), 대한치과교정학회
  3. Bagga DK, "Adult orthodontics versus adolescent orthodontics : an overview", J Oral Health Comm Dent, 4, pp.42~47 (2010)
  4. Hassan AH, "Association of orthodontic treatment needs and oral health-related quality of life in young adults", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp.42~47 (2010)
  5. Pabari S, "Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 140, pp.e263~e272 (2011)
  6. "AAO Economics of Orthodontists/Patient Census survey comparison results"[URL]
  7. Baik HS, "The distributions and trends in maloclusion patients - a 10 year study of 2155 patients from YDSH", Korean J Orthod, 25, pp.87~100 (1995)
  8. 임동혁, "서울대학교 치과병원 교정과에 내원한 부정교합 환자의 최근 경향", 대한치과교정학회지, 33(1), pp.63~72 (2003), 대한치과교정학회
  9. Al-Zubair NM, "The subjective orthodontic treatment need assessed with the aesthetic component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need", Saudi J Dent Res, 6, pp.9~14 (2015)
  10. Bellot-Arcís C, "Orthodontic treatment need in a Spanish young adult population", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 17, pp.e638~e643 (2012)
  11. Hamdan AM, "The relationship between patient, parent and clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment need", Eur J Orthod, 26, pp.265~271 (2004)
  12. Wedrychowska-Szulc B, "Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment--a questionnaire study", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.447~452 (2010)
  13. Bourne CO, "Orthodontic treatment needs in Caribbean dental clinics", Eur J Orthod, 34, pp.525~530 (2012)
  14. 임현우, "Time series analysis of patients seeking orthodontic treatment at Seoul National University Dental Hospital over the past decade", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(5), pp.298~305 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
  15. 이선영, "일반인의 교정치료에 대한 지식수준, 태도에 대한 연구", 한국치위생학회지, 12(2), pp.252~260 (2012), 한국치위생학회[DOI]
  16. Kim SS, "The effects of related factors and perception of malocclusion on orthodontic treatment timing", J Korean Dent Assoc, 38, pp.452~465 (2000)
  17. Lee SJ, "Recognition of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need of 7~18 year-old korean adolescent", Korean J Orthod, 24, pp.367~394 (1994)
  18. Population projections for provinces (2013~2040), "Statistics Korea", Statistics Korea, ~ (2014)
  19. DeVellis RF, "Scale development: theory and applications", pp.73~158 (2012), Sage Publications
  20. Hinkin TR, "A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires", Organ Res Methods, 1, pp.104~121 (1998)
  21. Bae BR, "Structural equation modeling with amos 17.0: principles and practice", pp.1~588 (2009), Chungram
  22. Lozano LM, "Effect of the number of response categories on the reliability and validity of rating scales", Methodology, 4, pp.73~79 (2008)
  23. Polit DF, "The content validity index : are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations", Res Nurs Health, 29, pp.489~497 (2006)
  24. Polit DF, "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations", Res Nurs Health, 30, pp.459~467 (2007)
  25. Noh GS, "Properly know and use: SPSS & AMOS 21", pp.288~333 (2014), Hanbit Academy Inc
  26. 강장미, "Effect of malocclusion or orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life in adults", 대한치과교정학회지, 44(6), pp.304~311 (2014), 대한치과교정학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)