Cone-beam computed tomography assessment of mandibular asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To determine whether there is any difference between the cleft and non-cleft sides of the mandible in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients, or the right and left sides in control patients; and to determine if there is any difference between the mandibular asymmetry of UCLP patients and that of control patients. Methods: We examined cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 15 patients with UCLP and 15 age- and gender-matched control patients. We evaluated 8 linear, 3 surface, and 3 volumetric measurements and compared the cleft/non-cleft sides of UCLP patients and the right/left sides of controls. Results: There were no statistically significant gender differences in any linear, surface, or volumetric measurement. The single significant side-to-side difference in UCLP patients was a longer coronoid unit on the cleft side than on the non-cleft side (p = 0.046). Body volume was significantly lower in the UCLP group than in the control group (p = 0.008). Conclusions: In general, UCLP patients have symmetrical mandibles, although the coronoid unit length is significantly longer on the cleft side than on the non-cleft side. UCLP patients and controls differed only in body volume.
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether there is any difference between the cleft and non-cleft sides of the mandible in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients, or the right and left sides in control patients; and to determine if there is any difference between the mandibular asymmetry of UCLP patients and that of control patients. Methods: We examined cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 15 patients with UCLP and 15 age- and gender-matched control patients. We evaluated 8 linear, 3 surface, and 3 volumetric measurements and compared the cleft/non-cleft sides of UCLP patients and the right/left sides of controls. Results: There were no statistically significant gender differences in any linear, surface, or volumetric measurement. The single significant side-to-side difference in UCLP patients was a longer coronoid unit on the cleft side than on the non-cleft side (p = 0.046). Body volume was significantly lower in the UCLP group than in the control group (p = 0.008). Conclusions: In general, UCLP patients have symmetrical mandibles, although the coronoid unit length is significantly longer on the cleft side than on the non-cleft side. UCLP patients and controls differed only in body volume.
참고문헌 (32)
- Liukkonen M, "Mandibular asymmetry in healthy children", Acta Odontol Scand, 63, pp.168~172 (2005)
- Pirttiniemi P, "Relationships of bicondylar position to occlusal asymmetry", Eur J Orthod, 13, pp.441~445 (1991)
- Van Elslande DC, "Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.183~192 (2008)
- Bishara SE, "Dental and facial asymmetries: a review", Angle Orthod, 64, pp.89~98 (1994)
- Laspos CP, "Mandibular asymmetry in noncleft and unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 34, pp.410~416 (1997)
- Smahel Z, "Differences in craniofacial morphology between complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate in adults", Cleft Palate J, 20, pp.113~127 (1983)
- Kurt G, "Mandibular asymmetry in cleft lip and palate patients", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.19~23 (2010)
- Horswell BB, "Craniofacial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: skeletal growth from eight to eighteen years", Cleft Palate J, 25, pp.114~121 (1988)
- Persson M, "Mandibular asymmetry of hereditary origin", Am J Orthod, 63, pp.1~11 (1973)
- Schmid W, "A computer-based assessment of structural and displacement asymmetries of the mandible", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, pp.19~34 (1991)
- Hwang HS, "Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.779~785 (2006)
- Van Elslande DC, "Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.183~192 (2008)
- Ziegler CM, "Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 31, pp.126~130 (2002)
- Scarfe WC, "Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice", J Can Dent Assoc, 72, pp.75~80 (2006)
- Kyrkanides S, "Cranial base and facial skeleton asymmetries in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 37, pp.556~561 (2000)
- Steiner CC, "Cephalometrics in clinical practice", Angle Orthod, 29, pp.8~29 (1959)
- Grummons DC, "A frontal asymmetry analysis", J Clin Orthod, 21, pp.448~465 (1987)
- You KH, "Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of mandibular morphology in patients with facial asymmetry and mandibular prognathism", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 138(540), pp.e1~8 (2010)
- Park W, "Architectural characteristics of the normal and deformity mandible revealed by three-dimensional functional unit analysis", Clinical Oral Investigations, 14(6), pp.691~698 (2010)
- Kyrkanides S, "Mandibular asymmetry and antigonial notching in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 39, pp.30~35 (2002)
- Severt TR, "The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina", Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, 12, pp.171~176 (1997)
- Maeda M, "3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformities", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102, pp.382~390 (2006)
- Kyrkanides S, "Skeletal asymmetries of the nasomaxillary complex in noncleft and postsurgical unilateral cleft lip and palate individuals", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 32, pp.428~433 (1995)
- da Silva Filho OG, "Mandibular growth in patients with cleft lip and", or cleft palate--the influence of cleft type, 1993, pp.104, 269~275
- Krogman WM, "Craniofacial growth in different cleft types from one month to ten years", Cleft Palate J, 19, pp.206~211 (1982)
- Laspos CP, "Mandibular and maxillary asymmetry in individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 34, pp.232~239 (1997)
- Athanasiou AE, "Frontal cephalometric evaluation of transverse dentofacial morphology and growth of children with isolated cleft palate", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 19, pp.249~253 (1991)
- Moss ML, "The role of the functional matrix in mandibular growth", Angle Orthod, 38, pp.95~103 (1968)
- Kwon TG, "Relationship between the masticatory muscles and mandibular skeleton in mandibular prognathism with and without asymmetry", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 65, pp.1538~1543 (2007)
- Smahel Z, "Craniofacial morphology in unilateral cleft lip and palate prior to palatoplasty", Cleft Palate J, 23, pp.225~232 (1986)
- Horswell BB, "Craniofacial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: skeletal growth from eight to eighteen years", Cleft Palate J, 25, pp.114~121 (1988)
- Lascala CA, "Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom)", Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 33, pp.291~294 (2004)