An evaluation of the gingival biotype and the width of keratinized gingiva in the mandibular anterior region of individuals with different dental malocclusion groups and levels of crowding
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: To evaluate the relationship of gingival thickness (GT) and the width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) with different malocclusion groups and the level of crowding. Methods: A total of 187 periodontally healthy subjects (121 females and 66 males) who presented at the Faculty of Dentistry in Yüzüncü Yıl University for orthodontic treatment were enrolled in the study. The individuals involved in the study were divided into three groups; Angle Class I malocclusion, Angle Class II malocclusion, and Angle Class III malocclusion. Each group was classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the level of crowding. WKG was determined as the distance between the mucogingival junction and the free gingival margin. GT was determined by the transgingival probing technique. Factorial variance analysis and the Duncan multiple comparison test were employed to identify the extent to which a difference was apparent between the groups according to these parameters. Results: It was determined that teeth in the mandibular anterior region display the thin gingival biotype. WKG and GT were observed as being higher at the mandibular incisor teeth in the severe crowding group and at the mandibular canine teeth in the mild crowding group. The GT of the mandibular right central and lateral incisors was found to be thinner in the Angle Class III group. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, the results demonstrate that, there is no significant relationship of WKG and the mean GT in the mandibular anterior region according to the Angle classification.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(3):176-185]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the relationship of gingival thickness (GT) and the width of keratinized gingiva (WKG) with different malocclusion groups and the level of crowding. Methods: A total of 187 periodontally healthy subjects (121 females and 66 males) who presented at the Faculty of Dentistry in Yüzüncü Yıl University for orthodontic treatment were enrolled in the study. The individuals involved in the study were divided into three groups; Angle Class I malocclusion, Angle Class II malocclusion, and Angle Class III malocclusion. Each group was classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the level of crowding. WKG was determined as the distance between the mucogingival junction and the free gingival margin. GT was determined by the transgingival probing technique. Factorial variance analysis and the Duncan multiple comparison test were employed to identify the extent to which a difference was apparent between the groups according to these parameters. Results: It was determined that teeth in the mandibular anterior region display the thin gingival biotype. WKG and GT were observed as being higher at the mandibular incisor teeth in the severe crowding group and at the mandibular canine teeth in the mild crowding group. The GT of the mandibular right central and lateral incisors was found to be thinner in the Angle Class III group. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, the results demonstrate that, there is no significant relationship of WKG and the mean GT in the mandibular anterior region according to the Angle classification.[Korean J Orthod 2017;47(3):176-185]
참고문헌 (29)
- La Rocca AP, "Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness", Implant Dent, 21, pp.507~515 (2012)
- Zawawi KH, "Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion", Saudi Med J, 33, pp.671~675 (2012)
- Cook DR, "Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 31, pp.345~354 (2011)
- 신연우, "Association of gingival biotype with the results of scaling and root planing", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 43(6), pp.283~290 (2013), 대한치주과학회
- Bains VK, "Accretion of gingival height by gingival thickness augmentation: A clinical report", Asian J Oral Health Allied Sci, 3, pp.25~31 (2013)
- Renkema AM, "Gingival labial recessions in orthodontically treated and untreated individuals: a case - control study", J Clin Periodontol, 40, pp.631~637 (2013)
- Chatzopoulou D, "Management of gingival recession in the orthodontic patients", Semin Orthod, 21, pp.15~26 (2015)
- Slutzkey S, "Gingival recession in young adults: occurrence, severity, and relationship to past orthodontic treatment and oral piercing", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.652~656 (2008)
- Renkema AM, "Gingival recessions and the change of inclination of mandibular incisors during orthodontic treatment", Eur J Orthod, 35, pp.249~255 (2013)
- Kamak G, "The effect of changes in lower incisor inclination on gingival recession", ScientificWorldJournal, 2015, pp.193206~ (2015)
- Yared KF, "Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 130, pp.6.e1~6.e8 (2006)
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.2~24 (2007), Mosby Elsevier
- Sayin MO, "Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population", Angle Orthod, 74, pp.635~639 (2004)
- Silness J, "Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition", Acta Odontol Scand, 22, pp.121~135 (1964)
- Löe H, "Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Pregnancy and severity", Acta Odontol Scand, 21, pp.533~551 (1963)
- Melsen B, "Factors of importance for the development of dehiscences during labial movement of mandibular incisors: a retrospective study of adult orthodontic patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 127, pp.552~561 (2005)
- Coatoam GW, "The width of keratinized gingiva during orthodontic treatment:its significance and impact on periodontal status", J Periodontol, 52, pp.307~313 (1981)
- Wennström JL, "Mucogingival considerations in orthodontic treatment", Semin Orthod, 2, pp.46~54 (1996)
- Stein JM, "The gingival biotype:measurement of soft and hard tissue dimensions - a radiographic morphometric study", J Clin Periodontol, 40, pp.1132~1139 (2013)
- Fu JH, "Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology", J Periodontol, 81, pp.569~574 (2010)
- Greenberg J, "Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level", J Periodontol, 47, pp.514~517 (1976)
- Kan JY, "Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.237~243 (2010)
- Hirschfeld I, "A study of skulls in the American museum of natural history in relation to periodontal disease", J Dent Res, 5, pp.241~265 (1923)
- Kolte R, "Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location", J Indian Soc Periodontol, 18, pp.478~481 (2014)
- Wara-aswapati N, "Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age", J Periodontol, 72, pp.1407~1412 (2001)
- Closs LQ, "Gingival margin alterations and the preorthodontic treatment amount of keratinized gingiva", Braz Oral Res, 21, pp.58~63 (2007)
- Proffit WR, "Contemporary orthodontics", pp.72~106 (2007), Mosby Elsevier
- Zawawi KH, "Gingival biotype in relation to incisors' inclination and position", Saudi Med J, 35, pp.1378~1383 (2014)
- Matarese G, "Periodontal biotype:characteristic, prevalence and dimensions related to dental malocclusion", Minerva Stomatol, 65, pp.231~238 (2016)