Comparison of tooth movement and biological response in corticotomy and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. Methods: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups. Results: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAPpositive osteoclasts. Conclusions: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the amount of tooth movement and histologic changes with different corticotomy designs and micro-osteoperforation in rabbits. Methods: The sample consisted of 24 rabbits divided into three experimental groups (triangular corticotomy [TC] and indentation corticotomy [IC] with flap, and flapless micro-osteoperforations [MP]) and a control. A traction force of 100 cN was applied by connecting the first premolars to the incisors. The amount of tooth movement was measured. Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess differences in tooth movement between the groups. Micro-computed tomography, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP) analysis were performed. Analysis of variance was applied to assess differences in TRAP-positive osteoclast count between the groups. Results: The amount of tooth movement increased by 46.5% and 32.0% in the IC and MP groups, respectively, while the bone fraction analysis showed 69.7% and 8.5% less mineralization compared to the control. There were no significant intergroup differences in the number of TRAPpositive osteoclasts. Conclusions: The micro-osteoperforation group showed no significant differences in the amount of tooth movement compared to the corticotomy groups, nor in the TRAP-positive osteoclast count compared to both corticotomy groups and control.
참고문헌 (30)
- Igarashi K, "Anchorage and retentive effects of a bisphosphonate(AHBuBP)on tooth movements in rats", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 106, pp.279~289 (1994)
- Işeri H, "Rapid canine retraction and orthodontic treatment with dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 127, pp.533~541 (2005)
- Liou EJ, "Rapid canine retraction through distraction of the periodontal ligament", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114, pp.372~382 (1998)
- Gantes B, "Effects on the periodontium following corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics. Case reports", J Periodontol, 61, pp.234~238 (1990)
- Chung KR, "Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics", J Clin Orthod, 35, pp.331~339 (2001)
- Suya H., "Mechanical and biological basics in orthodontic therapy", pp.207~226 (1991), Huthig Buch Verlag
- Kook YA, "Corticotomyassisted space closure in adult patients with missing lower molars", J Clin Orthod, 47, pp.85~95 (2013)
- McBride MD, "How does the amount of surgical insult affect bone around moving teeth", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 145, pp.S92~9 (2014)
- Mostafa YA, "Comparison of corticotomyfacilitated vs standard tooth-movement techniques in dogs with miniscrews as anchor units", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136, pp.570~577 (2009)
- Teixeira CC, "Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement", J Dent Res, 89, pp.1135~1141 (2010)
- Alikhani M, "Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 144, pp.639~648 (2013)
- Michele Cassetta, "The combined use of computer-guided, minimally invasive, flapless corticotomy and clear aligners as a novel approach to moderate crowding: A case report", 대한치과교정학회지, 47(2), pp.130~141 (2017), 대한치과교정학회
- Charavet C, "Localized piezoelectric alveolar decortication for orthodontic treatment in adults : a randomized controlled trial", J Dent Res, 95, pp.1003~1009 (2016)
- Ruso S, "Bone response to buccal tooth movements-with and without flapless alveolar decortication", Eur J Orthod, 36, pp.613~623 (2014)
- Swapp A, "Flapless cortical bone damage has no effect on medullary bone mesial to teeth being moved", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 147, pp.547~558 (2015)
- Lindskog-Stokland B, "Orthodontic tooth movement into edentulous ridge areas--a case series", Eur J Orthod, 35, pp.277~285 (2013)
- Nagaraj K, "Titanium screw anchorage for protraction of mandibular second molars into first molar extraction sites", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134, pp.583~591 (2008)
- Santos PBDD, "Movement of mandibular molar into edentulous alveolar ridge : a cone-beam computed tomography study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 151, pp.907~913 (2017)
- Kim T, "RANKL expression in rat periodontal ligament subjected to a continuous orthodontic force", Arch Oral Biol, 52, pp.244~250 (2007)
- 유지연, "Histologic effects of intentional-socket-assisted orthodontic movement in rabbits", 대한치과교정학회지, 42(4), pp.207~217 (2012), 대한치과교정학회[DOI]
- Chen YW, "Osteoclastogenesis in local alveolar bone in early decortication-facilitated orthodontic tooth movement", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0153937~ (2016)
- Alkebsi A, "Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class II malocclusion : a randomized controlled clinical trial", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, pp.771~785 (2018)
- Cheung T, "Ability of mini-implant-facilitated micro-osteoperforations to accelerate tooth movement in rats", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 150, pp.958~967 (2016)
- Buschang PH, "Interdisciplinary therapy: using contemporary approaches for complex cases", pp.135~165 (2016), The University of Michigan
- Aboul-Ela SM, "Miniscrew implant-supported maxillary canine retraction with and without corticotomy-facilitated orthodontics", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 139, pp.252~259 (2011)
- Roberts WE, "Bone tissue interface", Int J Oral Implantol, 5, pp.71~74 (1988)
- Mapara M, "Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research", Dent Res J(Isfahan), 9, pp.111~118 (2012)
- Castañeda S, "Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits", Skeletal Radiol, 35, pp.34~41 (2006)
- Chan E, "Physical properties of root cementum:part 26. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on orthodontic root resorption: a microcomputed tomography study", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 153, pp.204~213 (2018)
- Owen KM, "Elevation of a full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap alone accelerates orthodontic tooth movement", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 152, pp.49~57 (2017)