본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Strategic Resource Distribution in M&A: The Influence of Digitalization and TMT Overconfidence

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: This study examines the impact of digitalization on M&A investment activities, focusing on distribution processes and the moderating role of top management team (TMT) overconfidence. Based on Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) and Upper Echelons Theory, we analyze how digital technologies influence M&A decisions and how managerial cognitive biases affect this relationship. Research Design, Methodology, and Approach: We argue that digitalization enhances distribution efficiency by improving supply chain communication, streamlining operations, integrating advanced analytics, reducing transaction costs, and enabling better information processing. This can lead to improved M&A investments. Using a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms from 1994 to 2015, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed. Results: The findings show that digitalization positively affects M&Ainvestments and distribution efficiency. However, overconfident TMTs weaken this positive effect. Conclusions: Ourstudy highlights the importance of considering distribution and managerial traits in M&A decisions during the digital era. We acknowledge the limitation of not directly measuring distribution advantages due to a focus on manufacturing firms and suggest future research in settings where distribution effects are clearer.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the impact of digitalization on M&A investment activities, focusing on distribution processes and the moderating role of top management team (TMT) overconfidence. Based on Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) and Upper Echelons Theory, we analyze how digital technologies influence M&A decisions and how managerial cognitive biases affect this relationship. Research Design, Methodology, and Approach: We argue that digitalization enhances distribution efficiency by improving supply chain communication, streamlining operations, integrating advanced analytics, reducing transaction costs, and enabling better information processing. This can lead to improved M&A investments. Using a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms from 1994 to 2015, partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was employed. Results: The findings show that digitalization positively affects M&Ainvestments and distribution efficiency. However, overconfident TMTs weaken this positive effect. Conclusions: Ourstudy highlights the importance of considering distribution and managerial traits in M&A decisions during the digital era. We acknowledge the limitation of not directly measuring distribution advantages due to a focus on manufacturing firms and suggest future research in settings where distribution effects are clearer.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. "Digitalization, ecosystems, entrepreneurship, and policy" (2017)[URL]
  2. Bhandari, R., "Digital transformation and the use of digitalization for strategic decision making", Journal of Business Strategy, 32(4), pp.102135~ (2023)[DOI]
  3. Brieger, S. A., "How digital technologies change the dynamics of firms’ international expansion : The role of market orientation and digital capabilities", Journal of International Management, 28(4), pp.100949~ (2022)[DOI]
  4. Christensen, C. M., "The new M&A playbook", Harvard Business Review, 89(3), pp.48~57 (2011)
  5. Coase, R. H., "The nature of the firm", Economica, 4(16), pp.386~405 (1937)[DOI]
  6. Dana, J., "Internet penetration and capacity utilization in the US airline industry", American Economic Journal : Microeconomics, 6(4), pp.106~137 (2014)[DOI]
  7. D'Aveni, R. A., "Crisis and the content of managerial communications : A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), pp.634~657 (1990)[DOI]
  8. De Reuver, M., "The digital platform : a research agenda", Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), pp.124~135 (2018)[DOI]
  9. El-Khatib, R., "CEO network centrality and merger performance", Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), pp.349~382 (2015)[DOI]
  10. Etemad, H., "Internetization as the necessary condition for internationalization in the newly emerging economy", Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8, pp.319~342 (2010)[DOI]
  11. Gaughan, P. A., "Maximizing corporate value through mergers and acquisitions: A strategic growth guide" (2013), John Wiley & Sons
  12. Greve, H. R., "A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations : Evidence from shipbuilding", 46(6), pp.685~702 (2003)
  13. Hambrick, D. C., "Upper echelons : The organization as a reflection of its top managers", Academy of Management Review, 9(2), pp.193~206 (1984)[DOI]
  14. Hambrick, D. C., "Upper echelons theory : An update", Academy of Management Review, 32(2), pp.334~343 (2007)[DOI]
  15. Haspeslagh, P. C., "Managing acquisitions:creating value through corporate renewal" (1991), Free Press
  16. Hayward, M. L., "Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions : Evidence of CEO hubris", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), pp.103~127 (1997)
  17. Kang, T., "Beyond the numbers : The effect of 10-K tone on firms’ performance predictions using text analytics", Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), pp.370~381 (2018)[DOI]
  18. Klayman, J., "Overconfidence : It depends on how, what, and whom you ask", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79(3), pp.216~247 (1999)[DOI]
  19. Klenke, K., "Content analysis in leadership research, Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership" (2016), Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  20. Koh, P. S., "CEO confidence and unreported R&D", Management Science, 64(12), pp.5725~5747 (2018)[DOI]
  21. Koellinger, P., ""I think I can, I think I can" : Overconfidence and entrepreneurial behavior", Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4), pp.502~527 (2007)[DOI]
  22. Kuhn, P., "Is Internet job search still ineffective?", The Economic Journal, 124(581), pp.1213~1233 (2014)[DOI]
  23. Lu, Q., "Effects of e-commerce channel entry in a two-echelon supply chain : A comparative analysis of singleand dual-channel distribution systems", International Journal of Production Economics, 165, pp.100~111 (2015)[DOI]
  24. Malmendier, U., "Who makes acquisitions? CEO Overconfidence and the market's reaction", Journal of Financial Economics, 89(1), pp.20~43 (2008)[DOI]
  25. Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis:An expanded sourcebook" (1994), Sage Publications
  26. Moore, D. A., "The trouble with overconfidence", Psychological Review, 115(2), pp.502~517 (2008)[DOI]
  27. Mosch, P., "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier", International Journal of Production Economics, 236, pp.108141~ (2021)[DOI]
  28. Nadolska, A., "Good learners : How top management teams affect the success and frequency of acquisitions", Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), pp.1483~1507 (2014)[DOI]
  29. Nambisan, S., "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship : Progress, challenges and key themes", Research Policy, 46(4), pp.1029~1037 (2017)[DOI]
  30. Nagle, F., "Transaction cost economics in the digital economy : A research agenda", Strategic Organization (2024)[DOI]
  31. Pennebaker, J. W., "Linguistic styles : language use as an individual difference", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), pp.1296~1312 (1999)[DOI]
  32. Plaksina, Y., "The impact of achieved social status on M&A decisions", Journal of Financial Management, 64, pp.282~300 (2019)[DOI]
  33. Pirvulescu, P., "Supply chain management in the age of digitalization : Revealing the trends of SCM 4. 0", International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(2), pp.414~428 (2019)
  34. Roll, R., "The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers", Journal of Business, 59(2), pp.197~216 (1986)
  35. Sherman, A. J., "Mergers and acquisitions from A to Z" (2010), Amacom
  36. Simon, M., "The relationship among biases, misperceptions, and the introduction of pioneering products : Examining differences in venture decision contexts", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), pp.105~124 (2003)[DOI]
  37. Tilson, D., "Digital Infrastructures : The Missing IS Research Agenda", Information Systems Research, 21(4), pp.748~759 (2010)[DOI]
  38. Tu, W., "Can digital transformation facilitate firms’M&A : Empirical discovery based on machine learning", Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(1), pp.113~128 (2023)[DOI]
  39. Twardawski, T., "Board overconfidence in mergers and acquisitions", Journal of Business Research, 165, pp.114026~ (2023)[DOI]
  40. Wang, J., "Can digitalization facilitate cross-border M&A? Evidence from Chinese A-share listed companies", Research in International Business and Finance, 67, pp.102118~ (2024)[DOI]
  41. Weston, J. F., "Takeovers, restructuring, and corporate governance" (2004), Pearson Prentice Hall
  42. Williamson, O. E., "The economics of organization : The transaction cost approach", American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), pp.548~577 (1981)[DOI]
  43. Zhang, M., "The impact of digital transformation on corporate cross-border mergers and acquisitions", Finance Research Letters, 58, pp.104427~ (2023)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)