본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among patients aged 12–22 years: A retrospective study

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objective: This study aimed to establish the prevalence and patterns of nonsyndromic tooth agenesis in patients referred to a tertiary health care facility. Methods: The intraoral records and panoramic radiographs of 9,874 patients aged 12–22 years were evaluated. The study group included 716 patients (371 male, 345 female) with non-syndromic agenesis of at least one tooth (except the third molars). The study data were assessed using descriptive statistics, chisquare test, and Mann–Whitney U test, while patterns were evaluated using a tooth agenesis code (TAC) tool. Results: A total of 1,627 congenitally missing teeth, were found in patients with non-syndromic tooth agenesis, with an average of 2.27 missing teeth per patient. The prevalence of tooth agenesis was 7.25%, and the most commonly missing teeth were the left mandibular second premolars (10.17%). The age group comparison revealed no significant difference in the median number of missing teeth per patient according to the cutoff values for ages between 12 and 22 years. When the missing teeth were examined separately according to quadrants, 114 different tooth agenesis patterns (upper right quadrant = 28, upper left quadrant = 27, lower left quadrant = 31, and lower right quadrant = 28) were identified, and 81 of these patterns appeared only once. Conclusions: This study highlights the benefits of applying the TAC tool in a large sample population. The application of the TAC tool in such studies will enable the development of template treatment plans by determining homogenous patterns of tooth agenesis in certain populations.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to establish the prevalence and patterns of nonsyndromic tooth agenesis in patients referred to a tertiary health care facility. Methods: The intraoral records and panoramic radiographs of 9,874 patients aged 12–22 years were evaluated. The study group included 716 patients (371 male, 345 female) with non-syndromic agenesis of at least one tooth (except the third molars). The study data were assessed using descriptive statistics, chisquare test, and Mann–Whitney U test, while patterns were evaluated using a tooth agenesis code (TAC) tool. Results: A total of 1,627 congenitally missing teeth, were found in patients with non-syndromic tooth agenesis, with an average of 2.27 missing teeth per patient. The prevalence of tooth agenesis was 7.25%, and the most commonly missing teeth were the left mandibular second premolars (10.17%). The age group comparison revealed no significant difference in the median number of missing teeth per patient according to the cutoff values for ages between 12 and 22 years. When the missing teeth were examined separately according to quadrants, 114 different tooth agenesis patterns (upper right quadrant = 28, upper left quadrant = 27, lower left quadrant = 31, and lower right quadrant = 28) were identified, and 81 of these patterns appeared only once. Conclusions: This study highlights the benefits of applying the TAC tool in a large sample population. The application of the TAC tool in such studies will enable the development of template treatment plans by determining homogenous patterns of tooth agenesis in certain populations.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Nowak AJ, "Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence" (2019), Elsevier
  2. Endo T, "A survey of hypodontia in Japanese orthodontic patients", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.29~35 (2006)
  3. Goya HA, "An orthopantomographic study of hypodontia in permanent teeth of Japanese pediatric patients", J Oral Sci, 50, pp.143~150 (2008)
  4. Tan SP, "Severe hypodontia : identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis", Eur J Orthod, 33, pp.150~154 (2011)
  5. Arai K, "Tooth agenesis patterns in Japanese orthodontic patients with nonsyndromic oligodontia", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 156, pp.238~247 (2019)
  6. Káldy A, "Severe hypodontia in permanent dentition. Orthodontic treatment of oligodontia in children", Fogorv Sz, 105, pp.161~165 (2012)
  7. Filius MAP, "Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children diagnosed with oligodontia. A cross-sectional study", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16, pp.2371~ (2019)
  8. Locker D, "Oral health-related quality of life of children with oligodontia", Int J Paediatr Dent, 20, pp.8~14 (2010)
  9. Silva Meza R, "Radiographic assessment of congenitally missing teeth in orthodontic patients", Int J Paediatr Dent, 13, pp.112~116 (2003)
  10. Iezzi G, "Split crest technique for implant treatment of agenesis of the upper lateral incisors : results of a randomized pilot histological and clinical study at 24-month follow-up", Braz Oral Res, 34, pp.e118~ (2020)
  11. Sisman Y, "Hypodontia. Does the prevalence and distribution pattern differ in orthodontic patients?", Eur J Dent, 1, pp.167~173 (2007)
  12. Aren G, "The prevalence of dental anomalies in a Turkish population", J Istanb Univ Fac Dent, 49, pp.23~28 (2015)
  13. Cantekin K, "Prevalence and intra-oral distribution of agenesis of permanent teeth among Eastern Turkish children", Eur J Paediatr Dent, 13, pp.53~56 (2012)
  14. Kirzioğlu Z, "Clinical features of hypodontia and associated dental anomalies : a retrospective study", Oral Dis, 11, pp.399~404 (2005)
  15. Gökkaya B, "Prevalence and characteristics of non-syndromic hypodontia among Turkish orthodontic patient population", J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 5, pp.170~175 (2015)
  16. van Wijk AJ, "A numeric code for identifying patterns of human tooth agenesis : a new approach", Eur J Oral Sci, 114, pp.97~101 (2006)
  17. Souza-Silva BN, "Non-syndromic tooth agenesis patterns and their association with other dental anomalies : a retrospective study", Arch Oral Biol, 96, pp.26~32 (2018)
  18. Gkantidis N, "Patterns of nonsyndromic permanent tooth agenesis in a large orthodontic population", Arch Oral Biol, 79, pp.42~47 (2017)
  19. Park MK, "Prevalence of delayed tooth development and its relation to tooth agenesis in Korean children", Arch Oral Biol, 73, pp.243~247 (2017)
  20. Lauwers L, "Hypodontia: therapeutic strategy elaborated from 30 cases", Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac, 110, pp.263~268 (2009)
  21. Nunn JH, "The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia : background and role of paediatric dentistry", Br Dent J, 194, pp.245~251 (2003)
  22. Ota S, "Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among malocclusion classes in a Japanese orthodontic population", J Oral Sci, 61, pp.504~507 (2019)
  23. Konstantonis D, "A cross-sectional analysis of the prevalence of tooth agenesis and structural dental anomalies in association with cleft type in non-syndromic oral cleft patients", Prog Orthod, 18, pp.20~ (2017)
  24. Al-Abdallah M, "Prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies : a comparison between maxillary and mandibular tooth agenesis", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 148, pp.793~798 (2015)
  25. Zhang J, "Prevalence of tooth agenesis in adolescent Chinese populations with or without orthodontics", Chin J Dent Res, 18, pp.59~65 (2015)
  26. Bozga A, "A study of prevalence and distribution of tooth agenesis", J Med Life, 7, pp.551~554 (2014)
  27. Mani SA, "Prevalence and patterns of tooth agenesis among Malay children", Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health, 45, pp.490~498 (2014)
  28. Guan G, "Prevalence of tooth agenesis in orthodontic patient population in Western New York", N Y State Dent J, 79, pp.31~35 (2013)
  29. Celikoglu M, "Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population", Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 15, pp.e797~801 (2010)
  30. Dang HQ, "The prevalence of dental anomalies in an Australian population", Aust Dent J, 62, pp.161~164 (2017)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)