본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

피부사상균 이외의 진균이 배양된 손발톱진균증의 KONCPA 소견

KONCPA Findings of Onychomychotic Nail Samples Where Non-dermatophytic Fungi were Cultured

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류미생물학

초록

Background: When Candida species and molds (non-dermatophytic filamentous fungi) are cultured from the onychomycotic nail samples, it is sometimes difficult to consider whether they are the causative fungi or not. Although repeated culture is the most effective method to solve the problem, it is time-consuming and not cost-effective. But KONCPA (KOH + Nail clipping + PAS stain) is an inexpensive, quick, sensitive and very useful supportive test for considering whether the cultured non-dermatophytic fungi are real causative fungi or not. Objectives: This study was aimed to know whether KONCPA test would increase the diagnostic sensitivity of onychomycosis and whether KONCPA findings would be of help to diagnose the accurate causative fungi in case where the Candida species and molds were cultured. Methods: Nail samples were obtained from 213 patients with onychomycosis for fungus culture and KONCPA test. And the KONCPA findings were reviewd for the onychomycotic nail samples where the non-dermatophytic fugi such as Candida species and molds were cultured. Results: The results of this study were summarized as follows: 1. From 93 onychomycotic nail samples, dermatophytes were cultured in 24 (11.3%), Candida spp. in 36 (16.9%), and molds in 33 samples (15.5%). 2. Of the 36 samples where the Candida spp. were cultured, 24 (66.7%) showed findings of dermatophytes, 2 (5.6%) of Candida spp. and remaining 10 (27.7%) samples were inadequate for diagnosis. 3. Of 33 samples where the molds were cultured, 30 (90.9%) showed findings of dermatophytes, 1 (3.0%) of molds and remaining 2 (6.1%) samples were inadequate for diagnosis. Conclusions: Among 93 onychomycotic nail samples where the non-dermatopytic fungi were cultured, only 3 samples were compatible with KONCPA findings. Therefore, in cases where Candida spp. and molds were cultured and the KONCPA findings were not compatible with the cultured fungi, the cultured fungi should not be considered as the definite causative fungi until other material evidence was obtained.

Abstract

Background: When Candida species and molds (non-dermatophytic filamentous fungi) are cultured from the onychomycotic nail samples, it is sometimes difficult to consider whether they are the causative fungi or not. Although repeated culture is the most effective method to solve the problem, it is time-consuming and not cost-effective. But KONCPA (KOH + Nail clipping + PAS stain) is an inexpensive, quick, sensitive and very useful supportive test for considering whether the cultured non-dermatophytic fungi are real causative fungi or not. Objectives: This study was aimed to know whether KONCPA test would increase the diagnostic sensitivity of onychomycosis and whether KONCPA findings would be of help to diagnose the accurate causative fungi in case where the Candida species and molds were cultured. Methods: Nail samples were obtained from 213 patients with onychomycosis for fungus culture and KONCPA test. And the KONCPA findings were reviewd for the onychomycotic nail samples where the non-dermatophytic fugi such as Candida species and molds were cultured. Results: The results of this study were summarized as follows: 1. From 93 onychomycotic nail samples, dermatophytes were cultured in 24 (11.3%), Candida spp. in 36 (16.9%), and molds in 33 samples (15.5%). 2. Of the 36 samples where the Candida spp. were cultured, 24 (66.7%) showed findings of dermatophytes, 2 (5.6%) of Candida spp. and remaining 10 (27.7%) samples were inadequate for diagnosis. 3. Of 33 samples where the molds were cultured, 30 (90.9%) showed findings of dermatophytes, 1 (3.0%) of molds and remaining 2 (6.1%) samples were inadequate for diagnosis. Conclusions: Among 93 onychomycotic nail samples where the non-dermatopytic fungi were cultured, only 3 samples were compatible with KONCPA findings. Therefore, in cases where Candida spp. and molds were cultured and the KONCPA findings were not compatible with the cultured fungi, the cultured fungi should not be considered as the definite causative fungi until other material evidence was obtained.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Haneke E., "Fungal infections of the nail", Semin Dermatol, 10, pp.41~53 (1991)
  2. 서무규, "조갑진균증의 치료 및 예방", 의진균지, 6, pp.140~142 (2001)
  3. Midgley G, "Mycology of nail disorders", J Am Acad Dermatol, 31, pp.S68~74 (1994)
  4. Daniel CR 3rd, "The diagnosis of nail fungal infection", Arch Dermatol, 127, pp.1566~1567 (1991)
  5. Summerbell RC, "Onychomycosis, tinea pedis and tinea manuum caused by non¬dermatophytic filamentous fungi", Mycoses, 32, pp.609~619 (1989)
  6. 김정원, "피부진균의 임상적 및 균학적 관찰", 대피지, 11, pp.139~150 (1973)
  7. 임경진, "피부사상균증의 임상적 및 병학적 조사연구", 대피지, 16, pp.435~442 (1978)
  8. 정상립, "줄을 이용한 조갑 백선의 원인균의 분리법", 대피지, 24, pp.613~617 (1986)
  9. 김종순, "피부진균증의 임상 및 균학적 연구 (1988-1990)", 대피지, 30, pp.68~75 (1992)
  10. 이학규, "표재성 피부진균증의 임상적 및 균학적 관찰", 대피지, 31, pp.559~566 (1993)
  11. Liu HN, "a new method for diagnosing tinea unguium", Dermatology, 187, pp.166~168 (1993)
  12. English MP, "Nails and fungi", Br J Dermatol, 94, pp.697~701 (1976)
  13. Barranco V, "Proceedings and transactions of onycho- mycosis", Int J Dermatol, 33, pp.292~299 (1994)
  14. Greer DL, "Evolving role of nondermatophytes in onychomycosis", Int J Dermatol, 34, pp.521~524 (1995)
  15. Clayton YM, "Clincal and mycological diagnostic aspects of onychomycoses and dermatomycoses", Clin Exp Dermatol, 17(1), pp.37~40 (1992)
  16. Willemsen M, "Changing patterns in superficial fungal infections: focuson onychomycosis(suppl 2)", J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, pp.6~11 (1993)
  17. Kemna ME, "epidemiologic survey of superficial fungal disease", J Am Acad Dermatol, 35, pp.539~542 (1996)
  18. 임성욱, "조갑진균증의 임상 양상 및 원인균 동정 (1999-2002)", 대피지, 42, pp.53~60 (2004)
  19. Pierard GE, "Present and potential diagnostic techniques in onychomycosis", J Am Acad Dermatol, 34, pp.273~277 (1996)
  20. 김승용, "조갑진균증의 원인균 및 배양법에 관한 고찰", 대피지, 29, pp.50~55 (1991)
  21. 권오찬, "조갑진균증 진단에서 중합효소연쇄반응 방법의 의의: 진균 배양 및 KONCPA 검사와의 비교", 대피지, 37, pp.1457~1465 (1999)
  22. Suarez SM, "Histologic evaluation of nail clippings for diagnosing onyhomycosis", Arch Dermatol, 127, pp.1517~1519 (1991)
  23. 김성욱, "조갑진균증에서 진균 배양과 병리조직 소견의 비교 검토", 의진균지, 2, pp.31~42 (1997)
  24. 권윤희, "조갑진균증의 진단에 있어 KONCPA 검사의 임상적 의의", 대피지, 34, pp.527~537 (1996)
  25. 권경술, "조갑진균증의 진단에 있어 KOH 도말검사, 배양검사, KONCPA 검사 및 Fungi-Fluor® 염색법의 비교관찰", 의진균지, 3, pp.125~131 (1998)
  26. Hageage GJ, "Use of calcofluor white in clinical mycology", Lab Med, 15, pp.109~112 (1984)
  27. Kim YK, "Evaluation of calcofluor white stain for detection of Pneumocystis carinii", Diagn Microbol Infect Dis, 13, pp.307~310 (1990)
  28. Arrese JE, "Fungi in onychomycosis: a study by immunohistochemistry and dual flow cytometry", J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 4, pp.123~130 (1995)
  29. Baek SC, "Detection and differentiation of causative fungi of onychomycosis using PCR amplification and restric- tion enzyme analysis", Int J Dermatol, 37, pp.682~686 (1998)
  30. 조백기, "표재성 진균증의 진단 및 감별진단", 의진균지, 6, pp.49~56 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)