본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Corporate Entrepreneurship Perspective for the Internet of Things

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this paper is to establish an underlying framework for undertaking entrepreneurial initiatives within an established corporation, using the new Internet of Things(IoT) as the grounding example. We find that successful IoT initiatives require that management finds new customers and new use cases against which to innovate, invests in the development of new IoT-centric platforms, and considers new business model relative to the company’s traditional revenue and resource strategies. Collectively, these can represent the development of a new business within an established business, e.g. corporate entrepreneurship. The case study method was primary source field research, where we conducted a series of interviews with key managers involved in company strategy and new product development. These cases represent the spectrum of small, medium, and large size corporations, with outcomes that include new market applications’ technologies in the form of new product lines and services. The framework proposed is grounded in company experience and makes it the basis for further empirical research. This paper also has important implications for practitioners who are planning and implementing IoT innovations in their own respective companies. A market, platform, and business model changes must be integrated into a single comprehensive strategy to produce desired entrepreneurial outcomes.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to establish an underlying framework for undertaking entrepreneurial initiatives within an established corporation, using the new Internet of Things(IoT) as the grounding example. We find that successful IoT initiatives require that management finds new customers and new use cases against which to innovate, invests in the development of new IoT-centric platforms, and considers new business model relative to the company’s traditional revenue and resource strategies. Collectively, these can represent the development of a new business within an established business, e.g. corporate entrepreneurship. The case study method was primary source field research, where we conducted a series of interviews with key managers involved in company strategy and new product development. These cases represent the spectrum of small, medium, and large size corporations, with outcomes that include new market applications’ technologies in the form of new product lines and services. The framework proposed is grounded in company experience and makes it the basis for further empirical research. This paper also has important implications for practitioners who are planning and implementing IoT innovations in their own respective companies. A market, platform, and business model changes must be integrated into a single comprehensive strategy to produce desired entrepreneurial outcomes.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Abercrombie, N., "The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology" (1984), Penguin
  2. Baldwin, C. Y., "Design Rules: The Power of Modularity" (2000), MIT Press
  3. Christensen, C., "The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail" (2013), Harvard Business Review Press
  4. Cooper, R. G., "Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products", Business Horizons, pp.44~54 (1990)
  5. Corbett, A., "Corporate Entrepreneurship:State‐of‐the‐Art Research and a Future Research Agenda", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), pp.812~820 (2013)
  6. Dess, G. G., "Emerging Issues in Corporate Entrepreneurship", Journal of Management, 29(3), pp.351~378 (2003)
  7. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Better Stories and Better Constructs: The Case of Rigor and Comparative Logic", Academy of Management Review, 16(3), pp.620~627 (1991)
  8. Eisenhardt, K. M., "Building Theories from Case Study Research", Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp.532~550 (1989)
  9. Gummesson, E., "Qualitative Methods in Management Research" (2000), Sage Publications
  10. Gawer, A., "Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), pp.417~433 (2014)
  11. Henderson, B., "The Experience Curve Reviewed: The Growth Share Matrix of the Product Portfolio" (1973), The Boston Consulting Group
  12. Jin, J., "An Information Framework for Creating a Smart City through Internet of Things", IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(2), pp.112~121 (2014)
  13. "A New Framework for Business Models" (2010)[URL]
  14. Kim, W., "Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant" (2005), Harvard Business School Press
  15. Kuratko, D. F., "Strategic Entrepreneurship: Exploring Different Perspectives of an Emerging Concept", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), pp.1~17 (2009)
  16. Leonard, D., "The Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining Sources of Innovation" (1998), Harvard Business School Press
  17. Meyer, M. H., "The Product Family and the Dynamics of Core Capability", Sloan Management Review, 34(3), pp.29~54 (1993)
  18. Meyer, M. H., "The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership" (1997), The Free Press
  19. Meyer, M. H., "Does Product Platforming Pay Off?", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(2), pp.1~22 (2017)
  20. Ojasalo, J., "Management of Innovation Networks: A Case Study of Diffeent Approaches", European Jouranl of Innovation Management, 11(1), pp.51~86 (2008)
  21. Phan, P. H., "Corporate Entrepreneurship: Current Research and Future Directions", Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), pp.197~205 (2009)
  22. Porter, M., "Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors" (1980), The Free Press
  23. Prahalad, C. K., "The Core Competence of the Corporation", Harvard Business Review, 68(3), pp.79~91 (1990)
  24. Quinn, J. B., "Intelligent Enterprise: A Knowledge and Service Based Paradigm for Industry" (1992), Simon and Schuster
  25. Roberts, E. B., "Entering New Businesses: Selecting Strategies for Success", Sloan Management Review, 26(3) (1985)
  26. Rumelt, R. P., "Competitive Strategic Management" (1984), Prentice-Hall
  27. Sharma, P., "Toward a Reconciliation of the Definitional Issues in the Field of Corporate Entrepreneurship", Entrepreneurship: Concepts, theory and Perspective, 23(3), pp.11~27 (1999)
  28. Simpson, T. W., "Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design", Analysis and Manufacturing, 18(1), pp.3~20 (2004)
  29. Teece, D. J., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management", Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509~533 (1997)
  30. Thomke, S., "Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments", California Management Review, 41(1), pp.8~30 (1998)
  31. Tushman, M., "Winning Through Innovation" (1997), Harvard Business School Press
  32. Ulrich, K., "The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm", Research Policy, 244(3), pp.419~440 (1995)
  33. Utterback, J., "Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation" (1994), Harvard Business School Press
  34. Worren. N, "Modularity, Strategic Flexibility, and Firm Performance: A Study of the Home Appliance Industry", Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), pp.1123~1140 (2002)
  35. Yin, R. K., "Case Study Research. Design and Methods" (1984), Sage
  36. Zook, C., "Profit from the Core" (2001), Harvard Business School Press

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)