괴물, 유동하는 N개의 신체와 현대적 생성 - 영화 <킹덤>, <기묘한 가족>, <카고>를 중심으로
Monster, N bodies in floating and postmodern becoming - Focusing on the movies Kingdom, Weird Family, Cargo
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The new thing has no choice but to declare its very existence as truth because there is no standard by which to evaluate it. This is because reality is not captured by any perception. The very existence of an object is a reality. There is truth in substance, and this is the only way thought arrives. In this respect, zombies are not apocalyptic, but new Genesis. This study discusses physical malformations in zombies from the perspective of generative vision. What kind of forces are inherent in the zombie's body, and what kind of explosive power these forces ultimately have, and what they make possible now. This was divided into 1) The monopoly of monster nature and the politics of disease → 2) N power fluid bodies and revolutionary capacity → 3) Transpersonal hospitality and mutual care system. This corresponds to the three-stept change of 1) Monsters as Tragedy → 2) The monster as a point of revolution → 3) Monser as a vision of coexistence 3 of the monster nature. The disease politics that monopolizes monster nature ultimately leads to the creation of refugees. However, upon closer examination, the fluid body of a zombie can become the seat of a revolution. This is the area between creation and it responds to modern creation in which a new combination emerges by connecting with the outside. After all, zombies provide a valid reference point for coexistence with strangers. It is necessary to systematize mutual recognition and care. The problem of philosophy is no longer eternity, but novelty. We are still in danger of thinking only of external differences subordinated to conceptual similarity and identity. Vision often emerges from exclusion and marginalization. This is why it is called Genesis, which rewrites the monster nature of zombies.
Abstract
The new thing has no choice but to declare its very existence as truth because there is no standard by which to evaluate it. This is because reality is not captured by any perception. The very existence of an object is a reality. There is truth in substance, and this is the only way thought arrives. In this respect, zombies are not apocalyptic, but new Genesis. This study discusses physical malformations in zombies from the perspective of generative vision. What kind of forces are inherent in the zombie's body, and what kind of explosive power these forces ultimately have, and what they make possible now. This was divided into 1) The monopoly of monster nature and the politics of disease → 2) N power fluid bodies and revolutionary capacity → 3) Transpersonal hospitality and mutual care system. This corresponds to the three-stept change of 1) Monsters as Tragedy → 2) The monster as a point of revolution → 3) Monser as a vision of coexistence 3 of the monster nature. The disease politics that monopolizes monster nature ultimately leads to the creation of refugees. However, upon closer examination, the fluid body of a zombie can become the seat of a revolution. This is the area between creation and it responds to modern creation in which a new combination emerges by connecting with the outside. After all, zombies provide a valid reference point for coexistence with strangers. It is necessary to systematize mutual recognition and care. The problem of philosophy is no longer eternity, but novelty. We are still in danger of thinking only of external differences subordinated to conceptual similarity and identity. Vision often emerges from exclusion and marginalization. This is why it is called Genesis, which rewrites the monster nature of zombies.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김성훈, "<킹덤> 시즌 1", ASTORY, ~ (2019)
- 박인제, "<킹덤> 시즌 2", ASTORY, ~ (2020)
- 이민재, "기묘한 가족", 씨네주, 오스타10스튜디오, ~ (2019)
- 벤 하울링, "카고", Umbrella Entertainment, Addictive Pictures, Causeway Films, Head Gear Films, ~ (2017)
- 강덕봉, "들뢰즈의 해체적 사유가 내포된 가변적 신체 이미지 연구", 기초조형학연구, 21(4), pp.1~12 (2020), 한국기초조형학회[DOI]
- 강선형, "푸코의 생명관리정치와 아감벤의 생명정치", 철학논총, 78(4), pp.129~148 (2014), 새한철학회
- 김민수, "한나 아렌트의 인권의 정치와 환대의 윤리", 평화연구, 28(2), pp.189~221 (2020), 평화와 민주주의연구소[DOI]
- 김성범, "21세기 왜 다시 좀비 영화인가? : 잠재태와 현실태의 현현(顯現) 개념을 중심으로", 씨네포럼, (18), pp.127~160 (2014), 영상미디어센터
- 김애령, "이방인과 환대의 윤리", 현상학과 현대철학, (39), pp.175~205 (2008), 한국현상학회
- 김은성, "감각과 사물", pp.31~39 (2022), 갈무리
- 김은주, "들뢰즈의 신체 개념과 브라이도티의 여성 주체", 한국여성철학, 20, pp.65~94 (2013), 한국여성철학회[DOI]
- 리처드 커니, "이방인, 신, 괴물", pp.71~143 (2004), 개마고원
- 손달임, "코로나19 관련 뉴스 보도의 언어 분석 - 헤드라인에 반영된 공포와 혐오를 중심으로 -", 이화어문논집, (51), pp.137~166 (2020), 이화어문학회[DOI]
- 송아름, "괴물의 변화: ‘문화세대’와 ‘한국형 좀비’의 탄생", 대중서사연구, (30), pp.185~223 (2013), 대중서사학회[DOI]
- 쉬잔 엠 드 라코트, "들뢰즈 : 철학과 영화", pp.55~ (2004), 열화당
- 에마뉘엘 레비나스, "존재에서 존재자로", pp.138~ (2001), 민음사
- 왈쩌, "관용에 대하여", pp.23~32 (2004), 미토
- 울리히 벡, "글로벌 위험사회", pp.307~ (2010), 길
- 이송이, "현대 아이티 문학 및 아이티 이민문학에 나타난 “다중성” －경계 없는 육체와 새로운 지형도：르네 데페스트르(René Depestre), 스탄리 페앙(Stanley Péan)의 작품에 나타난 “좀비” 연구－", 서강인문논총, (41), pp.198~229 (2014), 인문과학연구소
- 이원진, "K-Drama <킹덤>이 전시하는 토속적 미래학: 순종의 열망과 잡종의 변이 혁명", 영상문화, (39), pp.291~317 (2021), 한국영상문화학회[DOI]
- 이유혁, "정치적 주체로서 난민에 대해서: 난민의 생명정치와 트랜스로컬 정치지형학 그리기", 다문화와 평화, 11(1), pp.194~224 (2017), 다문화평화연구소[DOI]
- 이찬웅, "들뢰즈, 변신의 괴물학", 불어불문학연구, (93), pp.241~261 (2013), 한국불어불문학회
- 이찬웅, "들뢰즈의 신체 개념‒결백한 괴물‒", 철학, (130), pp.127~153 (2017), 한국철학회[DOI]
- 이찬웅, "들뢰즈, 괴물의 사유", pp.42~ (2020), 이학사
- 조르조 아감벤, "예외상태", pp.166~ (2009), 새물결
- 조르조 아감벤, "목적없는 수단", pp.25~ (2009), 난장
- 질 들뢰즈, "천 개의 고원", pp.452~454 (2001), 새물결
- 최정민, "전염병의 서사와 가상공동체", 인문언어, (10), pp.367~389 (2008), 국제언어인문학회
- 최훈, "의식, 상상가능성, 좀비", 인지과학, 16(4), pp.225~242 (2005), 한국인지과학회
- 홍성만, "위험사회와 공공성 탐색: 불산가스 및 방사능 누출 위험사례를 중심으로", 한국정책연구, 13(2), pp.117~135 (2013), 경인행정학회
- 황수영, "시몽동의 철학에서 개체초월성의 두 의미", 철학, (135), pp.47~73 (2018), 한국철학회[DOI]
- "과학이야기 - 넙치의 유전자로 딸기를 만들면?" (2000)[URL]