VE제안의 가치향상 유형별 수치적 범위기준 제시
Numerical Range Criteria for Classification of Value Engineering Proposals based on Value Improvement Types
3
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since its introduction in Korea, design VE has widely been used as a means to enhance values in the construction industry. However, a greater emphasis is still placed on cost reduction in approach attitudes and performance evaluations on the implementation of design VE. In this regard, this study presented a performance evaluation method for cost, function, and value of VE proposals. Numerical criteria on the increase and decrease of cost and function that can classify the value enhancement type of VE proposals were proposed based on the performance evaluation method. It is expected that the use of numerical criteria for the type classification of VE proposal, and cost and performance evaluation method proposed in this study will make it possible to conduct a clear and more intuitive evaluation of VE proposal. However, it is appropriate to use the numerical criteria as a guideline to apply the new performance evaluation method for VE proposals. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a statistical analysis with a wider range of users after the repeated application of the findings of this study, and thus to carry out research for presenting the numerical criteria for various types of users.
Abstract
Since its introduction in Korea, design VE has widely been used as a means to enhance values in the construction industry. However, a greater emphasis is still placed on cost reduction in approach attitudes and performance evaluations on the implementation of design VE. In this regard, this study presented a performance evaluation method for cost, function, and value of VE proposals. Numerical criteria on the increase and decrease of cost and function that can classify the value enhancement type of VE proposals were proposed based on the performance evaluation method. It is expected that the use of numerical criteria for the type classification of VE proposal, and cost and performance evaluation method proposed in this study will make it possible to conduct a clear and more intuitive evaluation of VE proposal. However, it is appropriate to use the numerical criteria as a guideline to apply the new performance evaluation method for VE proposals. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a statistical analysis with a wider range of users after the repeated application of the findings of this study, and thus to carry out research for presenting the numerical criteria for various types of users.
참고문헌 (9)
- 김수용, "GFI를 활용한 건설공사 시공VE 대안평가 방법", 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 16(3), pp.3~10 (2015), 한국건설관리학회[DOI]
- 구선근, "기술제안입찰 참여자간의 협업지원을 위한 중점협업관리요소 도출", 한국건설관리학회 논문집, 17(5), pp.3~11 (2016), 한국건설관리학회[DOI]
- Nam, K. W, , Proceeding of Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction, pp.74~75 (2018), Korea Institute of Building Construction
- Um, I. J, "Construction VE Expert-basic Course", pp.219~ (2015), Korea Value Engineering Institute
- 이환철, "시나리오 플래닝을 활용한 설계VE 제안의 가치평가 모델 개발", 대한건축학회논문집 구조계, 27(04), pp.113~120 (2011), 대한건축학회
- Park, W. Y, , Construction Engineering and Management, 13(5), pp.53~57 (2012)
- Dell’Isola, A, "Value Engineering Practical Applications", pp.464~ (1997), Wiley
- Tukey, JW, "Exploratory Data Analysis", pp.712~ (1977), Pearson
- 김덕우, "사무소 건물의 에너지 사용량 상대 평가 방법", 대한건축학회논문집, 30(9), pp.223~233 (2014), 대한건축학회[DOI]
