본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Perspective of COVID-19 outbreak , herd immunity formation and future public health strategies

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In Korea, where the successful control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic have been implemented by the follow-up survey management (containment) of COVID-19-infected persons, the number of infected persons has increased rapidly, and a re-epidemic trend is emerging. The Korean government is strengthening epidemic prevention activities, such as increasing the social distance in the metropolitan area to four levels and increasing the vaccination rate. The public has been complaining of dissatisfaction with the atrophy of socioeconomic activities and of distrust of epidemic prevention policies. Australia started with an incidence similar to that of Korea, but its social activities are more flexible than those of Korea, where the incidence is maintained at approximately 0.1 per 100,000 people. In comparing the differences between both countries in terms of the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker Stringency Index, it was found that Australia effectively regulates the number of infected cases by high-intensity intermittent mitigation and the subsequent allowance of social activities. Korea has also recommended a high-intensity intermittent mitigation policy as in Australia until community herd immunity via vaccination is formed.

Abstract

In Korea, where the successful control of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic have been implemented by the follow-up survey management (containment) of COVID-19-infected persons, the number of infected persons has increased rapidly, and a re-epidemic trend is emerging. The Korean government is strengthening epidemic prevention activities, such as increasing the social distance in the metropolitan area to four levels and increasing the vaccination rate. The public has been complaining of dissatisfaction with the atrophy of socioeconomic activities and of distrust of epidemic prevention policies. Australia started with an incidence similar to that of Korea, but its social activities are more flexible than those of Korea, where the incidence is maintained at approximately 0.1 per 100,000 people. In comparing the differences between both countries in terms of the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker Stringency Index, it was found that Australia effectively regulates the number of infected cases by high-intensity intermittent mitigation and the subsequent allowance of social activities. Korea has also recommended a high-intensity intermittent mitigation policy as in Australia until community herd immunity via vaccination is formed.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Schuppert A, "Different spreading dynamics throughout Germany during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic : a time series study based on national surveillance data", Lancet Reg Health Eur, 6, pp.100151~ (2021)
  2. Davies NG, "Etimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2lineage B.1.1.7 in England", Science, 372, pp.eabg3055~ (2021)
  3. "Increased household transmission of COVID19 cases associated with SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern B. 1.617. 2: a national case-control study" (2021)[URL]
  4. Thompson RN, "SARS-CoV-2 incidence and vaccine escape", Lancet Infect Dis, 21, pp.913~914 (2021)
  5. Edridge AW, "Seasonal coronavirus protective immunity is short-lasting", Nat Med, 26, pp.1691~1693 (2020)
  6. Kissler SM, "Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period", Science, 368, pp.860~868 (2020)
  7. "A sustainable exit strategy: managing uncertainty, minimising harm" (2020)[URL]
  8. "Variation in government responses to COVID-19: version 6.0" (2020)[URL]
  9. "WHO coronavirus (COVID-19)dashboard"[URL]
  10. "Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker"[URL]
  11. Pero A, "COVID-19 : a perspective from clinical neurology and neuroscience", Neuroscientist, 26, pp.387~391 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (102건)