Words are not just words: how the use of media language in the COVID-19 era affects public health
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
OBJECTIVES: Language can shape the way we perceive the world. In this paper, we investigated how exposure to media texts containing alarming and militaristic language affects peoples’ notions regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the consequences of this effect for public health. METHODS: After reading a passage including either alarming and militaristic or neutral terminology on COVID-19, participants completed a questionnaire in which they answered 4 questions on a 7-point Likert scale. The questions assessed participants’ notions on the end of the pandemic, vaccine effectiveness, and the consequences of COVID-19 for economies and mental health. Ordinal regression models in R were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Individuals who were exposed to alarming and militaristic language expressed more pessimistic notions regarding COVID-19 than those who were exposed to more neutral language. However, both groups of individuals had similar notions regarding vaccine effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The media should redefine the language they use for the description of the pandemic, considering that the extensive use of alarming and militaristic terminology may have a negative impact on public health.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Language can shape the way we perceive the world. In this paper, we investigated how exposure to media texts containing alarming and militaristic language affects peoples’ notions regarding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the consequences of this effect for public health. METHODS: After reading a passage including either alarming and militaristic or neutral terminology on COVID-19, participants completed a questionnaire in which they answered 4 questions on a 7-point Likert scale. The questions assessed participants’ notions on the end of the pandemic, vaccine effectiveness, and the consequences of COVID-19 for economies and mental health. Ordinal regression models in R were used for the analysis. RESULTS: Individuals who were exposed to alarming and militaristic language expressed more pessimistic notions regarding COVID-19 than those who were exposed to more neutral language. However, both groups of individuals had similar notions regarding vaccine effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: The media should redefine the language they use for the description of the pandemic, considering that the extensive use of alarming and militaristic terminology may have a negative impact on public health.
참고문헌 (25)
- Georgiou GP, "How the language we speak determines the transmission of COVID-19", Ir J Med Sci, 190, pp.1343~1348 (2021)
- Haroon O, "COVID-19 : media coverage and financial markets behavior-a sectoral inquiry", J Behav Exp Finance, 27, pp.100343~ (2020)
- Romanò CL, "Loud and silent epidemics in the third millennium : tuning-up the volume", Int Orthop, 44, pp.1019~1022 (2020)
- Sasaki N, "Exposure to media and fear and worry about COVID-19", Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 74, pp.501~502 (2020)
- Chiang WY, "Conceptual metaphors for SARS: ‘war’between whom?", Discourse Soc, 18, pp.579~602 (2007)
- Larson BM, "Metaphors and biorisks : the war on infectious diseases and invasive species", Sci Commun, 26, pp.243~268 (2005)
- Williams Camus JT, "Metaphors of cancer in scientific popularization articles in the British press", Discourse Stud, 11, pp.465~495 (2009)
- Basnyat I, "Framing of influenza A(H1N1)pandemic in a Singaporean newspaper", Health Promot Int, 30, pp.942~953 (2015)
- Vasterman PL, "Pandemic alarm in the Dutch media : media coverage of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1)pandemic and the role of the expert sources", Eur J Commun, 28, pp.436~453 (2013)
- Wallis P, "Disease metaphors in new epidemics : the UK media framing of the 2003 SARS epidemic", Soc Sci Med, 60, pp.2629~2639 (2005)
- Cohn C, "Women and wars: contested histories, uncertain futures", pp.1~35 (2013), Wiley
- Annas GJ, "Reframing the debate on health care reform by replacing our metaphors", N Engl J Med, 332, pp.744~747 (1995)
- Cockburn C, "Sites of violence gender and conflict zones", pp.24~44 (2004), University of California Press
- Forester S, "Antidemocratic and exclusionary practices : COVID-19 and the continuum of violence", Politics Gend, 16, pp.1150~1157 (2020)
- Kelly JF, "Does it matter how we refer to individuals with substance-related conditions? A randomized study of two commonly used terms", Int J Drug Policy, 21, pp.202~207 (2010)
- Aslam F, "Sentiments and emotions evoked by news headlines of coronavirus disease(COVID-19)outbreak", Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 7, pp.23~ (2020)
- Warriner AB, "Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13, 915 English lemmas", Behav Res Methods, 45, pp.1191~1207 (2013)
- Olimat SN, "COVID-19 pandemic : euphemism and dysphemism in Jordanian Arabic", GEMA Online J Lang Stud, 20, pp.268~288 (2020)
- "R: a language and environment for statistical computing" (2018)[URL]
- "MASS: support functions and datasets for venables and Ripley’s MASS: version 7.3-53.1" (2021)[URL]
- "Least-squares means; version 2.30-0" (2018)[URL]
- Haas EJ, "Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel : an observational study using national surveillance data", Lancet, 397, pp.1819~1829 (2021)
- Lakoff G, "Metaphors we live by" (2003), University of Chicago Press
- Ricoeur P, "The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling", Crit Inq, 5, pp.143~159 (1978)
- Fitzpatrick KM, "How bad is it? Suicidality in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic", Suicide Life Threat Behav, 50, pp.1241~1249 (2020)