본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상사중재에 있어서 당사자자치의 역할

A Study on the Role of Party Autonomy in Commercial Arbitration

1

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

Abstract

This paper is to research on the role of party autonomy in the decision of applicable law for the arbitral proceeding, arbitral award and arbitration agreement, in the decision of the place of arbitration, in the composition of arbitration tribunal, and the choice of arbitral proceedings. The principle of party autonomy is fundamental to arbitration in general and to international arbitration in particular. Generally the term of party autonomy is used as the autonomy of the parties to decide all aspects of an arbitration procedure subject only to certain limitations of mandatory law. Party autonomy permits the parties to a commercial arbitration to choose the laws and make the rules which govern the arbitral proceedings. Party autonomy allows the parties freedom to choose the applicable laws for the arbitral proceeding and the place of arbitration. Party autonomy is recognized in relation to the choice of law for the merits of the dispute as well as for the arbitration agreement and the arbitration procedure. On the basis of the recognition of party autonomy in international treaties, national legislation and court decisions, arbitral practice has generally accepted and enforced party autonomy both regarding the procedure and the applicable substantive law. All modern institutional rules of arbitration follow that line. Today it is recognized by national legislators all over the world to the effect that the jurisdiction of national courts can be excluded by arbitration agreement and that the parties may choose the law applicable to arbitral proceedings. Limits on party autonomy are imposed by mandatory provisions of international or national law or of institutional arbitration rules regarding the procedure. Mandatory laws at the place of the arbitration or under any procedural law chosen by the parties may restrict party autonomy. These mandatory laws usually take the form of public policy considerations in the arbitration. Limitations on party autonomy have been reduced more and more, and the trend of modern national as well as international legislation on arbitration leans clearly in the direction of a maximum of party autonomy.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. 고범준, "국제상사중재법 해의" (1992), 대한상사중재원
  2. 대한상사중재원, "외국중재법규집 제1집", ~ (2005)
  3. 목영준, "상사중재법론" (2000), 박영사
  4. 법무부, "국제상사중재제도", ~ (1999)
  5. 양병희, "주석 중재법", 대한상사중재원, ~ (2005)
  6. 이순우, "상사중재론" (1998), 법경사
  7. 장문철, "현대중재법의 이해" (2000), 세창출판사
  8. 장문철, "UNCITRAL 모델중재법의 수용론" (1999), 세창출판사
  9. 정기인, "상사중재론" (1992), 무역경영사
  10. 최장호, "상사분쟁관리론" (2003), 도서출판 두남
  11. 中村達也, "國際商事仲裁入門" (2001), 中央經濟社
  12. 小島武司・高桑召, "注釋と論点 仲裁法" (2007), 靑林書院
  13. 松浦 馨・靑山善充, "現代仲裁法の論点" (1998), 有斐閣
  14. 中野俊一郞, "仲裁契約の準據法と仲裁法", JCA ジヤㄧナル (2004), 日本商事仲裁協會
  15. Böckstiegel,Karl-Heinz, "The Role of Party Autonomy in International Arbitration in Handbook on International Arbitration and ADR", American Arbitration Association, ~ (2006)
  16. Born, Grary, "International Commercial Arbitration" (2001), Transnational Publishers
  17. Carbonneau,Thomas E., "Handbook on Commercial Arbitration", Amercican Arbitration Association, 2006, ~ (2006)
  18. Caron,David D., "The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules; A Commentary" (2006), Oxford University Press
  19. Mosk,Richard M, "The Role of Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Handbook on Commercial Arbitration,", American Arbitration Association, ~ (2006)
  20. Tweeddale,Andrew, "Arbitration of Commercial Disputes" (2007), Oxford University Press
  21. UNCTAD, "WTO International Trade Centre", Arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, 2001

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)