본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

남북상사중재 제도 활성화를 위한 남북협력방안-북한의 대외경제중재법(1980) 평가를 중심으로-

A Study on Cooperation Ways of South-North Korea for Revitalization of Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration System - Centering around Evaluation of the Foreign Economic Arbitration Act(2008) of North Korea -

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

In 2008, North Korea revised its Foreign Economic Arbitration Act. To some extent, the new Act reflected such international standard of arbitration as UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. In this paper, the said Act will be evaluated. and then cooperation ways of South-North Korea on Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration will be suggested. In 2007, the Ministry of Unification has designated the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board as Inter-Korean Arbitration Committee and has made efforts to prepare follow-up measures on the two Agreements of Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration . In 2008 however, the follow-up measures has in fact been suspended. In order to revitalize the Inter-Korean commercial arbitration, some prerequisites must be satisfied. First, Inter-Korean Arbitration Committee for Inter-Korean commercial arbitration should re-open as soon as possible. Second, as North Korea recently shows interest in joining the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards(now so called New York Convention), Governmental Authority of Rep. of Korea should also actively assist and support their joining in New York Convention. Third, both Korean governments should carry out joint study on raising the efficiency of the arbitration system which they will use. Fourth, comparative study on arbitration systems used in both countries should be conducted. Also, it may is very timely to discuss the issue in international arbitration community such as "North-East Asia International Arbitration Conference" or other similar events.In conclusion, continuous study on prevention of commercial disputes between South-North Korea and ways to resolve disputes when they arise should be conducted.

Abstract

In 2008, North Korea revised its Foreign Economic Arbitration Act. To some extent, the new Act reflected such international standard of arbitration as UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. In this paper, the said Act will be evaluated. and then cooperation ways of South-North Korea on Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration will be suggested. In 2007, the Ministry of Unification has designated the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board as Inter-Korean Arbitration Committee and has made efforts to prepare follow-up measures on the two Agreements of Inter-Korean Commercial Arbitration . In 2008 however, the follow-up measures has in fact been suspended. In order to revitalize the Inter-Korean commercial arbitration, some prerequisites must be satisfied. First, Inter-Korean Arbitration Committee for Inter-Korean commercial arbitration should re-open as soon as possible. Second, as North Korea recently shows interest in joining the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards(now so called New York Convention), Governmental Authority of Rep. of Korea should also actively assist and support their joining in New York Convention. Third, both Korean governments should carry out joint study on raising the efficiency of the arbitration system which they will use. Fourth, comparative study on arbitration systems used in both countries should be conducted. Also, it may is very timely to discuss the issue in international arbitration community such as "North-East Asia International Arbitration Conference" or other similar events.In conclusion, continuous study on prevention of commercial disputes between South-North Korea and ways to resolve disputes when they arise should be conducted.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김광수, "남북상사중재 제도의 정착방안에 관한 연구", 박사, 무역학과, pp.2007
  2. "남북상사중재 제도 정착화를 위한 과제", 2007 동북아 교역활성화 국제포럼 (2007), 한국중재학회
  3. 개성공단 상사분쟁해결에 관한 연구, "김광수", 통일부, ~ (2010)
  4. 북한의 대외경제교류법령의 주요 논점, "박정원", 법원행정처, ~ (2001)
  5. "북한의 대외경제 중재제도에 관한 고찰-대외경제중재법을 중심으로", 북한법연구, (4) (2002)
  6. "북한대외경제중재법", ~ (2008)
  7. 석광현, "국제상사중재법연구(제1권)" (2007), 박영사
  8. 사회과학원 법학연구소, "민사법사전" (1997), 평양 사회안전출판사
  9. 이주원, "개성공단 법제 인프라 구축 방안 중 개성공단에서의 남북 상사분쟁 해결방안", 2006 북한법 및 남북관계법 학술회의 발표논문집 (2006)
  10. 이주원, "개성공단에서의 분쟁해결을 위한 중재규칙의 제정방향", 국제상학, 22(3), pp.113~134 (2007), 한국국제상학회
  11. 장명봉, "북한의 새로운 대외경제중재법(2008)개관", 중재, (333) (2010), 대한상사중재원
  12. "조선국제무역중재위원회 심의규정", ~ (1989)
  13. "조선국제무역중재위원회 중재규정", ~ (1999)
  14. 북.중경제관계의 남북경협의 대북 파급효과와 비교분석, "최수영", 통일연구원, ~ (2011)
  15. "통일신문(제516호)", ~ (2011)
  16. "한국중재법", ~ (2002)
  17. Bruce E. Bechtol Jr., "The Implications of the Cheonan Sinking: A Security Studies Perspective", International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 19(2), pp.1~40 (2010), 통일연구원
  18. Dennis Deng, "China", Dispute Resolution,, Review (2010)
  19. Felix, Hess, "China", International Arbitration Review (2010)
  20. ICC, "Guide to Export-Import Basics", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)