중재판정 승인의 개념, 효력 및 절차에 관한 연구
A Study on the Meaning, Effects, and Procedure of Recognizing Arbitral Awards
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When a court recognizes an arbitral award, it acknowledges that the award is valid and binding, and thereby gives it a set of effects similar to those of a court’s judgment, among which res judicata is the most important. The res judicata effect of an arbitral award generally forbids parties to an action from subsequently litigating claims that were raised in a prior arbitration. In common law countries, res judicata may also preclude re-adjudication of issues raised and decided in a prior arbitration. The Korean Arbitration Act acknowledges the rights of parties to an arbitral award to seek not only an enforcement judgment but also a recognition judgment on an arbitral award. Therefore, the question arises whether or not the winning party in an arbitration must acquire a recognition judgment on the arbitral award in order to enjoy the effects of a recognized award. However,according to the case law and generally accepted views, an arbitral award is automatically recognized without any additional procedure, as long as it satisfies the requirements for recognition. Therefore, in order to resolve this question, it is desirable to eliminate the statutory clause that stipulates the right to seek recognition judgment.
Abstract
When a court recognizes an arbitral award, it acknowledges that the award is valid and binding, and thereby gives it a set of effects similar to those of a court’s judgment, among which res judicata is the most important. The res judicata effect of an arbitral award generally forbids parties to an action from subsequently litigating claims that were raised in a prior arbitration. In common law countries, res judicata may also preclude re-adjudication of issues raised and decided in a prior arbitration. The Korean Arbitration Act acknowledges the rights of parties to an arbitral award to seek not only an enforcement judgment but also a recognition judgment on an arbitral award. Therefore, the question arises whether or not the winning party in an arbitration must acquire a recognition judgment on the arbitral award in order to enjoy the effects of a recognized award. However,according to the case law and generally accepted views, an arbitral award is automatically recognized without any additional procedure, as long as it satisfies the requirements for recognition. Therefore, in order to resolve this question, it is desirable to eliminate the statutory clause that stipulates the right to seek recognition judgment.
참고문헌 (31)
- 金能煥, "註釋民事訴訟法(Ⅲ)" (2012), 한국사법행정학회
- 金洪奎, "外國仲裁判定의 國內에서의 承認 및 執行, In 商事仲裁硏究叢書 Ⅶ" (1975), 대한상사중재원
- 목영준, "상사중재법" (2011), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제사법과 국제소송 제4권" (2007), 박영사
- 석광현, "국제민사소송법" (2012), 박영사
- 양병회, "註釋仲裁法" (2005), 대한상사중재원·한국중재학회
- 이시윤, "新民事訴訟法" (2012), 박영사
- 강병근, "국제 중재 판정의 취소 및 승인, 집행과 우리 중재법의 개정", 계간 국제법률경영, (여름) (1996), 재단법인 국제법률경영연구원
- 강병근, "우리 중재법의 개정방향과 1996년 잉글랜드 중재법", 중재학회지, 6 (1996)
- 김상호, "한국에서의 외국중재판정의 승인과 집행", 중재연구, 17(3), pp.3~30 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 김언숙, "일본법상 외국중재판정의 승인집행 -적용법규와 승인집행거부를 중심으로-", 중재연구, 20(3), pp.25~46 (2010), 한국중재학회
- 김용진, "반소 및 상계의 국제관할", 民事訴訟, 3 (2000), 한국민사소송법학회지
- 서세원, "중재판정의 기판력에 관한 고찰A Study on the Res Judicata of Arbitral Awards", 중재연구, 17(2), pp.3~21 (2007), 한국중재학회
- 석광현, "한국의 국제재판관할규칙의 입법에 관하여", 국제거래법연구, 21(2), pp.143~179 (2012), 국제거래법학회
- 石光現, "외국중재판정의 승인·집행제도의 개선방안, In 國際私法과 國際訴訟 제5권" (2012), 박영사
- 안건형, "2011 프랑스 개정 민사소송법의 주요 내용과 시사점 – 국제중재법을 중심으로 –", 민사소송, 15(2), pp.93~121 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회
- 李鎬元, "外國仲裁判定의 承認과 執行 : 뉴욕協約을 中心으로", 재판자료, 34 (1986), 법원행정처
- 李鎬元, "仲裁判定의 執行判決節次", 民事訴訟, 9(1) (2005), 한국민사소송법학회지
- 崔公雄, "外國判決의 效力", 司法論集, 18 (1987), 법원행정처
- 小島武司, "注解仲裁法" (1988), 靑林書院
- 小島武司, "注釋と論点仲裁法" (2007), 靑林書院
- 渡部美由紀, "國際仲裁における仲裁判斷の效力について", 民事訴訟雜誌, (58) (2012), 日本民事訴訟法學會
- Albert Jan van den Berg, "The Arbitration Convention of 1958" (1981), Kluwer Law and Taxation
- Emmanuel Gaillard, "Fouchard, Gillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration" (1999), Kluwer Law International
- Gary B. Born, "International Commercial Arbitration Volume Ⅰ,Ⅱ" (2009), Wolters Kluwer
- "International Commercial Arbitration : Analytic commentary on draft text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration(A", CN.9, pp.1985, ~
- Jack J. Coe Jr., "International Commercial Arbitration : American Principles and Practice in a Global Context" (1997), Transntional Publishers
- Margaret L. Moses, "The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Nigal Blackaby, "Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Saenger, "Zivilprozessordnung Handkommentar(4. Auflage)" (2011), Nomos Verlaggesellschaft
- South Korea: Receptive to Foreign Arbitration Awards?, "Beomsu Kim", Asian-Counsel Special Report on Dispute Resolution, ~ (2010)